2019—2024年度珠江流域人为扰动用地分布及其水土流失特征分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

珠江水利委员会珠江流域水土保持监测中心站\珠江水利委员会珠江水利科学研究院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划“西南高山峡谷区土壤侵蚀预报优化与智慧监测体系”(2022YFF1302902);长江水利委员会长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(CKWV2016389/KY)。


Analysis on the distribution of artificial disturbance land and its characteristics of soil and water loss in the Pearl River Basin from 2019 to 2024
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

The national key research and development plan "soil erosion prediction optimization and intelligent monitoring system in southwest mountain and gorge area" (2022yff1302902); Project supported by the open research fund of the Yangtze River academy of Sciences of the Yangtze River Water Resources Commission (ckwv2016389/ky)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的]珠江流域作为我国南方重要的生态屏障与经济核心区,近年来在快速城市化与工业化进程中,人为扰动活动显著加剧,导致水土流失问题日益突出。本研究旨在系统分析2019—2024年珠江流域人为扰动用地的空间分布格局、动态变化及其引发的水土流失特征,评估水土保持监管成效,为流域生态治理与高质量发展提供科学依据。[方法]基于2019—2024年2米分辨率国产高分卫星影像、野外调查,结合GIS空间分析、坡度提取、景观格局指数计算和半定量化规则,系统解译人为扰动地块的活动迹象、覆盖状态、水保措施及项目类型,定量评估侵蚀强度与空间格局。[结果]①2024年珠江流域人为扰动用地面积5554.16km2,其中流失面积为3388.75km2,占其人为扰动用地面积的61.01%;②空间分布呈“上游-下游双核集聚”,粤桂两省占比75.03%;③破碎化程度持续加剧,下游地块密度(PD)达82.75个/km2,地块平均(MPS)为0.0121km2;④监管成效显著,人为扰动面积六年递增,但流失占比从2019年91.05%降至61.01%,强烈以上侵蚀占比下降9.45%。[结论]珠江流域人为扰动监管在控制土壤侵蚀方面取得明显成效,但扰动地块数量持续增长、破碎化程度加剧,加大了治理与监管的难度。为此,本文提出实施分类精准管控、强化高频次遥感监测与技术手段、推动多部门协同共治等对策,以提升流域水土流失防控能力,支撑区域生态安全与高质量发展目标的实现。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The Pearl River Basin is an important ecological barrier and economic core area in southern China. In recent years, in the process of rapid urbanization and industrialization, human disturbance activities have increased significantly, leading to the increasingly prominent problem of soil and water loss. The purpose of this study is to systematically analyze the spatial distribution pattern, dynamic changes and the characteristics of soil and water loss caused by man-made disturbance in the Pearl River Basin from 2019 to 2024, evaluate the effectiveness of soil and water conservation regulation, and provide a scientific basis for the ecological management and high-quality development of the basin. [method] Based on the domestic high-resolution satellite images with 2-meter resolution from 2019 to 2024 and the field survey, combined with GIS spatial analysis, slope extraction, landscape pattern index calculation and semi quantitative rules, the activity signs, coverage status, soil and water conservation measures and project types of artificially disturbed plots were systematically interpreted, and the erosion intensity and spatial pattern were quantitatively evaluated. [results] ① in 2024, the area of human disturbance in the Pearl River Basin was 5554.16km 2, of which the loss area was 3388.75km 2, accounting for 61.01% of the area of human disturbance; ② The spatial distribution is "upstream downstream dual core agglomeration", with Guangdong and Guangxi provinces accounting for 75.03%; ③ The degree of fragmentation continues to increase, and the density (PD) of the downstream plots reaches 82.75/km 2, and the average (MPS) of the plots is 0.0121 km 2; ④ The regulatory effect is remarkable. The area of human disturbance has increased in six years, but the proportion of loss has decreased from 91.05% in 2019 to 61.01%, and the proportion of strong erosion has decreased by 9.45%. [Conclusion] The regulation of human disturbance in the Pearl River Basin has achieved remarkable results in controlling soil erosion, but the number of disturbed plots continues to grow and the degree of fragmentation is increasing, which increases the difficulty of governance and regulation. Therefore, this paper puts forward some countermeasures, such as implementing classified and accurate management and control, strengthening high-frequency remote sensing monitoring and technical means, and promoting multi sectoral collaborative governance, in order to improve the prevention and control ability of soil and water loss in the basin, and support the realization of regional ecological security and high-quality development goals.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-21
  • 最后修改日期:2025-10-20
  • 录用日期:2025-10-20
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: