不同空间尺度耕地埂坎提取方法及其分布特征研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院;2.西南大学地理科学学院;3.中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

重庆师范大学博望学者领军人才项目(BWLJ2023012)资助


Extraction Methods and Distribution Characteristics of Farmland Bunds at Different Spatial Scales
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Geography and Tourism,Chongqing Normal University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的] 针对埂坎人工调查效率低、现有遥感影像提取尺度适配性不足等问题,构建多源数据协同的“宏观识别-微观提取”多尺度提取方法体系,提升埂坎识别与参数估算的精度与效率。[方法] 在县域尺度,基于卫星遥感影像与数字高程模型(DEM)建立埂坎(石坎/土坎)的特征解译方法,分析埂坎类型与地形的分布响应关系;在小流域尺度,融合无人机获取的数字正射影像图(DOM)与数字地表模型(DSM)数据,提取埂坎的埂长、埂宽、坎高及埂坎系数等几何参数,并通过偏离度(DE)、决定系数(R2)与均方根误差(RMSE)评估精度,构建几何参数的实测与反演值的线性回归模型。[结果] (1)卫星遥感影像适用于县域尺度耕地埂坎的识别与特征分析,虾子岭小流域验证埂坎条数与面积识别精度均超过91%。忠县耕地埂坎总数超过30万条,总面积约8 km2,埂坎系数约3%。(2)无人机影像可高精度提取小流域尺度的埂坎参数,埂长、埂宽、坎高及埂坎系数的绝对偏差分别小于2 m、0.1 m、0.3 m和2%,提取精度依次为埂长>埂宽>坎高>埂坎系数,土坎各项参数提取精度均优于石坎。参数回归模型拟合度良好(R2多在0.78以上),RMSE控制在1.6以内。(3)忠县埂坎集中分布于300~600 m高程和6°~15°坡度之间,数量随高程和坡度增加呈“先增后减”趋势,土坎多于石坎,槽谷区埂坎斑块面积大、数量多,山岭区埂坎密度较高且分布破碎。[结论] 构建的多源遥感协同方法适用于县域尺度埂坎分布格局识别与小流域尺度参数精细提取,回归模型可有效估算关键埂坎参数。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:[Objective] To address the low efficiency of manual surveys and the limited scale ability of existing remote sensing techniques in bund extraction, this study proposes a multi-source, multi-scale extraction framework of “macro-scale identification–micro-scale extraction” aimed at improving the accuracy and efficiency of farmland bund identification and parameter estimation.[Methods] At the county scale, satellite remote sensing imagery and digital elevation models (DEM) were integrated to establish an interpretation system for bund types (stone bunds vs. soil bunds) and to analyze their distributional responses to topographic factors. At the small watershed scale, high-resolution UAV-derived digital orthophoto maps (DOM) and digital surface models (DSM) were fused to extract geometric parameters of bunds, including length, width, height, and distribution coefficient. The extraction accuracy was evaluated using deviation error (DE), coefficient of determination (R2), and root mean square error (RMSE), and linear regression models were developed for parameter inversion.[Results] 1) Satellite remote sensing imagery demonstrated strong applicability for county-scale identification and characterization of farmland bunds. Validation in the Xiaziling watershed indicated that recognition accuracies for bund count and area both exceeded 91%. At the county level, more than 300,000 bunds were identified in Zhong County, with a total area of approximately 8 km2 and a bund coefficient of about 3%. 2) UAV imagery allows high-precision extraction of bund parameters at the watershed scale with absolute deviations of less than 2 m (length), 0.1 m (width), 0.3 m (height), and 2% (coefficient). The extraction accuracy ranked as: bund length > bund width > bund height > bund coefficient. Soil bunds consistently showed higher extraction accuracy than stone bunds. The regression models demonstrated a strong fit (R2 > 0.78; RMSE < 1.6). 3) In Zhongxian County, bunds are primarily distributed within elevation ranges of 300~600 m and slope ranges of 6°~15°, showing a‘first increasing then decreasing’trend with respect to both elevation and slope. Soil bunds have a wider distribution compared to stone bunds. Bund patches in valley areas are large and dense, whereas those in mountainous areas are closely spaced but fragmented, exhibiting linear or point-like patterns. [Conclusion] The proposed multi-source remote sensing method is suitable for both large-scale mapping of bund distribution and fine-scale parameter extraction. The regression models provide reliable estimates of bund metrics, offering technical support for ecological restoration and agricultural engineering planning in mountainous regions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-23
  • 最后修改日期:2025-10-30
  • 录用日期:2025-11-03
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: