西北地区生态产品价值实现成效评价——基于29个典型案例
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.西安建筑科技大学公共管理学院;2.陕西省林业科学院黄土高原水土保持与生态修复国家林草局重点实验室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金西部项目


Evaluation of the effectiveness of realizing the value of ecological products in Northwest China:Based on 27 typical case studies in the field of natural resources
Author:
Affiliation:

1.National Forestry Bureau Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration on Loess Plateau,Shaanxi Academy of Forestry,Xi'2.'3.an

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的]生态产品价值实现是通过政策、市场与技术的创新,将生态优势转变为经济发展优势,其成效评价结果是价值转化程度的一种衡量。[方法]文中以西北地区29个典型案例为研究对象,构建了“资源-机制-效益”三维评价体系,并基于熵值法和综合指数法,测算生态产品价值实现的总体成效、各阶段成效以及不同模式的成效。[结果](1)生态产品价值实现案例的总体成效呈现显著差异,16个案例未达到36.47的平均水平,价值实现仍有提升空间。多元机制协同是生态产品价值实现过程的核心阶段,综合效益产出受政策时滞等影响,成效显现相对缓慢且得分偏低。(2)现有的生态产品价值实现模式均包含产业化的价值实现路径。“交易+产业化”“修复+交易+产业化”和“补偿+产业化”的成效得分分别为46.27、41.72、38.62,成效评价结果较好。(3)“产业化”与“修复+产业化”两种模式均以多元机制协同为首要成效,“补偿+产业化”模式在综合效益产出方面的成效得分最高,达到48.86。[结论]西北地区生态产品价值实现已取得阶段性成效,但仍面临综合效益产出较低的问题。在后续推动生态产品价值实现的过程中,需以综合效益最大化为导向,建立健全多元协同机制,持续优化市场交易环境。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The realization of ecological product value involves transforming ecological advantages into economic development advantages through policy, market, and technological innovations. The evaluation of its effectiveness serves as a measure of the degree of value conversion. [Methods] This study examines 29 typical cases in Northwest China, establishing a three-dimensional evaluation system encompassing “resources-mechanisms -benefits.” Using entropy value methods and composite index methods, it calculates the overall effectiveness, stage-specific effectiveness, and effectiveness of different models in realizing ecological product value. [Results](1)Overall effectiveness varies significantly across cases, with 16 falling below the average of 36.47, suggesting room for improvement.(2)All existing models incorporate industrialization pathways. Specifically, the effectiveness scores for “transaction + industrialization,” “restoration + transaction + industrialization,” and “compensation + industrialization” are 46.27, 41.72, and 38.62, respectively, indicating relatively favorable outcomes.The synergistic operation of multiple mechanisms constitutes the core stage in realizing the value of ecological products. The output of comprehensive benefits is influenced by factors such as policy lags, resulting in relatively slow manifestation of outcomes and lower scores.(3)Both the “industrialization” and “restoration + industrialization” models prioritized multi-mechanism coordination as their primary outcome, while the “compensation + industrialization” model achieved the highest score (48.86) in comprehensive benefit generation. [Conclusion] The realization of ecological product value in the Northwest region has achieved phased results, yet it still faces the challenge of relatively low comprehensive benefit output. In the subsequent process of promoting the realization of ecological product value, efforts should be guided by maximizing comprehensive benefits, establishing and improving multi-stakeholder coordination mechanisms, and continuously optimizing the market transaction environment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-08
  • 最后修改日期:2026-01-06
  • 录用日期:2026-01-07
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: