基于DFA-灰色聚类模型的亚高山草甸风电场土地损毁评价
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.云南农业大学资源与环境学院;2.中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司;3.云南农业大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X82

基金项目:

亚高山草甸植被及工程扰动影响研究项目(2023BG204001-01);国家重点研发计划(2024YFD1700104);“云南省兴滇英才支持计划”青年人才(YNWR-QNBJ-2018-338);云南省教育厅项目(2022J0300)


Evaluation of land damage in subalpine meadow wind farms based on DFA-Gray clustering model
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Research Project on Subalpine Meadow Vegetation and the Impact of Engineering Disturbance (2023BG204001-01); National Key Research and Development Programme (2024YFD1700104); Young Talents of Yunnan Province Xing Dian Ying Talent Support Programme (YNWR-QNBJ-2018-338); Yunnan Provincial Department of Education Project (2022J0300).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【目的】以位于云南省寻甸县高本山的亚高山草甸风电场为例,构建土地损毁评价模型,旨在有效判别该区域因建设导致的土地损毁程度。【方法】选取17个评价指标(土壤要素10个、损毁要素7个),基于Delphi-Fuzzy-AHP(以下简称为DFA)方法确定指标权重,并结合灰色聚类法建立可能度函数,通过观测值计算7个评价单元(一期风机区2个、二期风机区2个、弃渣场、采石场、原地貌)的可能度函数值,最终通过比较系数大小,确定各评价单元的土地损毁程度分级。【结果】(1)损毁要素权重(0.642)显著高于土壤要素(0.358);损毁要素核心因子为损毁面坡长(0.183)与植被覆盖度(0.168),反映其对工程安全与水土流失的直接影响;土壤要素中土壤容重(0.0695)与有机质含量(0.0504)权重最高,主因施工导致土壤结构变化与肥力下降。(2)灰色聚类评价显示,一期工程损毁程度为中度(Ⅲ级),二期风机区为极强度(Ⅴ级),弃渣场为强度(Ⅳ级),采石场为剧烈(Ⅵ级),原地貌为轻度(Ⅱ级)。(3)损毁程度差异源于施工扰动强度与修复周期:一期工程因表层土壤保存与自然恢复时间长,生态修复效果较好;二期工程扰动面积大且竣工时间短,植被恢复滞后。【结论】目前,该风电场建设土地损毁较为严重,其土地损毁以施工扰动为主导,损毁要素的高权重凸显其对工程安全与生态风险的优先性。研究验证了DFA-灰色聚类模型的适用性,能够为其他风电场生态修复与管理提供科学依据。

    Abstract:

    Taking the subalpine grassland wind farm located on Gaoben Mountain in Xundian County, Yunnan Province as an example, a land damage evaluation model was constructed to effectively determine the extent of land damage caused by construction in the area. Seventeen evaluation indicators (10 soil-related and 7 damage-related) were selected. Indicator weights were determined using the Delphi-Fuzzy-AHP (hereafter referred to as DFA) method. A possibility function was established by integrating the grey clustering method. Observed values were used to calculate possibility function values for seven evaluation units (two in Phase I wind turbine zones, two in Phase II wind turbine zones, tailings pond, quarry, and original topography) using observed values. Finally, by comparing the magnitude of the coefficients, the land damage severity grades for each evaluation unit were determined. The results are as follows :(1) The weight of damage element (0.642) is significantly higher than that of soil element (0.358); the core factor of damage element is the slope length of damaged surface (0.183) and vegetation cover (0.168), reflecting its direct impact on engineering safety and soil erosion; the weight of soil capacity (0.0695) and organic matter content (0.0504) in the soil element is the highest, which is mainly due to the construction of the wind turbine. (2) Grey clustering evaluation shows that the soil structure changes and fertility decline. (2) Grey clustering evaluation shows that the damage degree of the first phase of the project is moderate (grade III), the second phase of the wind turbine area is very strong (grade V), the slag dump is strong (grade IV), the quarry is severe (grade Ⅵ), and the original landscape is light (grade II). (3) The difference in the degree of damage originates from the intensity of construction disturbance and the restoration cycle: the first phase of the project due to the preservation of surface soil and natural recovery for a long time, the ecological restoration effect is better; the second phase of the project is a large area of disturbance and the completion of a short period of time, the recovery of vegetation is lagging behind. At present, the land damage of Gaoben Mountain wind farm is relatively serious, and its land damage is dominated by construction disturbance, and the high weight of the damage elements highlights its priority for engineering safety and ecological risk. The study verified the applicability of the DFA-Gray clustering model, which can provide a scientific basis for ecological restoration and management of other wind farms.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-17
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-08
  • 录用日期:2025-12-12
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: