放牧干扰对岷江上游山地森林-干旱河谷交错带土壤微生物量及呼吸熵的影响
作者:
基金项目:

国家"十一五"科技支撑计划重大项目"长江中上游西南山区退化生态系统综合整治技术与模式"(2006BAC01A11-4);"十二五"科技支撑计划重大项目2011BAC09B05);四川农业大学创新团队项目(林业生态工程)


Effect of Grazing Disturbance on Soil Microbial Biomass and Respiratory Quotient in Mountain Forest of Arid Valley Ecotone in Upper Reaches of Minjiang River
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [16]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    选择岷江上游理县山地森林/干旱河谷交错带地区人工刺槐林、人工杨柳林、草地和锥花小檗灌丛这4种植被类型为研究对象,对4种植被下的土壤微生物量及呼吸熵对放牧干扰的响应进行了研究。以距牧道距离远近的不同设置了3种放牧干扰强度处理,分别对各植被类型3种放牧干扰强度的土壤进行了分析。结果表明,在各植被类型下,土壤有机碳(SOC)和土壤微生物量碳(MBC)含量随放牧干扰强度的增加而降低。各植被类型下表层土壤呼吸熵值(qCO2)值随放牧压力的增加而增大(除灌丛中度干扰外),增加幅度为15.14%~100.54%,说明放牧干扰使微生物体的周转率加快,对SOC的利用率降低,释放的CO2增多,土壤碳保存率降低。

    Abstract:

    This study focused on the responses of microbial biomass and respiratory quotient of 4 vegetation types to grazing disturbance at the upper reaches of Minjiang River. These vegetations were Robinia pseudoacacia, Artificial Poplar, Grassland and Berberis shrub. Three grazing disturbance intensity were set with different distances from sample plots to grazing-path. Then analyzed soils under different treatments. The results showed that at different vegetation types, the values of soil organic carbon(SOC) and microbial biomass corbon(MBC) decreased with the increasing grazing intensity; the values of qCO2 of surface soil increased by 15.14%~100.54% with the increase of grazing pressure(except moderate disturbance in shrubs). These data illustrated that grazing disturbance accelerated the turnover rate of microorganisms, decreased the utilization rate of SOC, increased emission content of CO2 and decreased preserving rate of soil carbon.

    参考文献
    [1] 阎建忠,张镱锂,摆万奇,等.大渡河上游生计方式的时空格局与土地利用/覆被变化[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(3):83-89.
    [2] 刘金鑫,宫渊波,左琴,等.山地牧道与植被空间异质性研究评述[J],草业学报,2012,21(1):254-261.
    [3] Liddle M J, Grieg S P. A survey of tracks and paths in a sand dune ecosystem(Ⅱ)[J].Journal of Applied Ecology, 1975,12(3):909-930.
    [4] 张建平,叶延琼,樊宏.岷江上游草地资源及合理利用[J].山地学报,2002,20(3):343-348.
    [5] 刘庆,尹华军,吴宁,等.岷江上游山地退化生态系统恢复与重建试验示范研究[C].湖北武汉:2007年中国科学技术协会年会.
    [6] 从怀军,成毅,安韶山,等.黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复措施对土壤养分和微生物量C、N、P的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(4):217-221.
    [7] Ocio J A, Brookes P C. An evaluation of methods for measuring the microbial biomass in soils following recent additions of wheat straw and the characterization of the biomass that develops[J].Soil Biol. Biochem., 1990,22(5):685-694.
    [8] 文启效.土壤有机质研究法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1984:273-284.
    [9] Biederbeck V O, Janzen H H, Campbell C A, et al. Labile soil organic matter as influenced by cropping practices in an arid environment[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1994,26(2):1647-1656.
    [10] 赵钦.岷江上游山地森林-干旱河谷交错带土壤理化性质研究[D].四川雅安:四川农业大学,2009.
    [11] 江源,章异平,杨艳刚,等.放牧对五台山高山、亚高山草甸植被-土壤系统耦合的影响[J],2010,30(4):0837-0846.
    [12] 马秀枝,王艳芬,汪诗平,等.放牧对内蒙古锡林河流域草原土壤碳组分的影响[J],植物生态学报,2005,29(4):569-576.
    [13] 李香真,陈佐忠.不同放牧率对草原植物与土壤C、N、P含量的影响[J].草地学报,1998,6(2):90-98.
    [14] Murnoz C, Monreal C M, Schnitzer M, et al. Influence of Acaciacaven(Mol)coverage on carbon distribution and its chemical composition in soil organic carbon fractions in a Mediterranean-type climate region[J].Geoderma, 2008,14(4):352-360.
    [15] Brookes P C. The use of microbial parameters in monitoring soil pollution by heavy metals[J]. Biol. Fert. Soils, 1995,19(4):269-279.
    [16] Christensen B T. Physical fraction of soil and organic matter in primary particle size and density separates[M]//Advances in Soil Science. New York:Springer Verlag, 1992.
    引证文献
    引证文献 [1]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘珊珊,王芬,张兴华,宫渊波,王燕,尹艳杰,李渊,马金松,郭挺.放牧干扰对岷江上游山地森林-干旱河谷交错带土壤微生物量及呼吸熵的影响[J].水土保持通报,2014,(2):63-68

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:945
  • 下载次数: 1480
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-16
  • 最后修改日期:2013-05-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-03-29