流域底泥重金属分布特征及其生态风险评价
作者:
基金项目:

山西省晋中市潇河管理局科技创新项目(01)


Distribution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Watershed Sediment
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [17]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了研究流域底泥重金属分布特征及成因,以潇河流域为研究区,利用原子吸收分光光度法测定底泥中6种重金属(Cu,Zn,Cd,Cr,Pb,Ni)的含量,分析了重金属污染特征及其成因,并采用潜在生态风险指数法评价了潇河流域底泥中重金属的潜在生态危害系数和危害指数。结果表明,正常淤积下,流域底泥重金属含量呈中上游流域高,下游流域低的趋势;非正常淤积下,如河道起伏不定,河流有新的污染物注入等,便会表现出下游高于上游的分布特征。就其成因来讲,流域底泥重金属含量受河流水质的影响较大,运用主成分分析(PCA)得出水质参数与重金属分布的关系。对潇河流域表层底泥中重金属的复合污染状况评价结果为:Cd> Pb> Ni> Cu> Cr> Zn。

    Abstract:

    In order to study the distribution characteristics and causes of heavy metals(HMs) in river sediment, six kinds of HMs(Cu, Zn, Cd, Cr, Pb and Ni) in sediment of the Xiaohe River were measured with atomic absorption spectrophotometer(AAS). The characteristics and causes of HMs pollution were analyzed and the potential ecological risk index method was used to assess the potential ecological risk coefficient and harm index of HMs in the river sediment. Results indicated that the content of HMs in sediment of the Xiaohe River was higher in the upper and middle basin, and lower in the lower basin under normal accumulation conditions. Under the non-normal accumulation conditions, such as channel fluctuation and new pollution sources, the content of HMs was higher in the lower basin than in the upper basin. The content of HMs in the river sediment was easily affected by water quality, and their relationship was analyzed by principal component analysis(PCA). Besides, the content of HMs in the river sediment was also affected by sediment size composition. Result from composite pollution evaluation for heavy metals in surface sediment of the Xiaohe River showed the order of Cd> Pb> Ni> Cu> Cr> Zn.

    参考文献
    [1] 严登华,邓伟,王金达,等.四平市条子河底泥中重金属特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2000,20(5):29-31.
    [2] 蒋庆丰,游珍,倪黎明,等.南通市河流底泥重金属污染及潜在生态风险评价[J].水资源保护,2010,26(5):11-15,19.
    [3] 李玉,俞志明,宋秀贤.运用主成分分析(PCA)评价海洋沉积物中重金属污染来源[J].环境科学,2006,27(1):137-141.
    [4] Kadokami K, Li Xueha, Pan Shuangye, et al. Screening analysis of hundreds of sediment pollutants and evaluation of their effects on benthic organisms in Dokai Bay, Japan[J].Chemosphere, 2013,90(2):721-728.
    [5] 张建华.太湖底泥污染物分布特征分析[J].环境化学,2011,30(5):1047-1048.
    [6] Schmid P, Bogdal C, Blüthgen N, et al. The missing piece:Sediment records in remote mountain lakes confirm glaciers being secondary sources of persistent organic pollutants[J]. Environmental Science and Technology,2011,45(1):203-208.
    [7] 戴树桂.环境化学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007:164-167.
    [8] 高甲荣,冯泽深,高阳,等.河溪近自然评价:方法与应用[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2010.
    [9] 尚英勇,倪师军,张成江,等.应用地质累积指数评价成都市河流表层沉积物重金属污染[J].广东微量元素科学,2005,12(10):12-16.
    [10] 徐争启,倪师军,张成江,等.应用污染负荷指数法评价攀枝花地区金沙江水系沉积物中的重金属[J].四川环境,2004,23(3):64-67.
    [11] Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control:A sediment ecological approach[J]. Water Research, 1980, 14(8):975-1000.
    [12] 唐银健.Hakanson指数y法评价水体沉积物重金属生态风险的应用进展[J].环境科学导则,2008,27(3):66-68.
    [13] 程杰,李学德,花日茂,等.巢湖水体沉积物重金属的分布及生态风险评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2008,27(4):1403-1408.
    [14] 弓晓峰,陈春丽,周文斌,等.鄱阳湖底泥中重金属污染现状评价[J].环境科学,2006,27(4):732-736.
    [15] 苏伟,刘景双,李方. 第二松花江干流重金属污染物健康风险评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2006,25(6):1611-1615.
    [16] 姜喜民,丁晓黎,熊伟. 应用模糊数学法评价嫩江上游水质状况[J]. 黑龙江水利科技,2009,37(1):9-10.
    [17] 陈翠华,倪师军,何彬彬,等. 基于GIS技术的江西德兴地区水系沉积物重金属污染的潜在生态危害研究[J]. 地球科学进展,2008,23(3):312-322.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

阳辉,樊贵盛,刘婷.流域底泥重金属分布特征及其生态风险评价[J].水土保持通报,2014,(2):208-212

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:954
  • 下载次数: 1579
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-04
  • 最后修改日期:2013-06-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-03-29