吉林省低山丘陵区侵蚀沟治理的碳汇作用
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157.2

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目“黑土地沟蚀发展演变及防控体系构建与示范”(2024YFD1501204-5);吉林省财政厅项目“吉林省侵蚀沟治理效益监测与评价”


Carbon sink function of erosion gully control in low mountain and hilly areas of Jilin Province
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的] 科学评估黑土区侵蚀沟治理工程的碳汇作用,为深入了解黑土区土壤侵蚀对碳汇作用的影响机制提供科学支撑。[方法] 于2024年秋季选取吉林省东部低山丘陵区两条不同治理年份(2017和2022年)、不同立地条件(林地和耕地)的侵蚀沟为研究对象,从保土保碳、减蚀减排、增绿增汇3方面定量评估其碳汇效应,对侵蚀沟内淤积泥沙进行体积测量及有机碳、容重测试,对乔灌木进行每木检尺。[结果] ①林地侵蚀沟(Ⅰ)的保土减排增汇量为1.602 0 t。其中,保土保碳量为0.564 1 t,减蚀减排量为0.112 8 t,增绿增汇量为0.925 1 t。耕地侵蚀沟(Ⅱ)的保土减排增汇量为1.474 8 t。其中,保土保碳量为1.162 0 t,减蚀减排量为0.232 4 t,增绿增汇量为0.080 4 t;②侵蚀沟Ⅰ的表层土壤(0—20 cm)有机碳含量和保土保碳量均显著高于其他土层(p<0.05),呈现明显表聚性,表层土壤保碳量比例最低达42.29%;③两条侵蚀沟的年均保土保碳量、减蚀减排量及增绿增汇量差异较大,治理年限、土地利用类型及人为因素等是造成两条侵蚀沟各方面碳汇作用差异的主要原因;林地侵蚀沟通过长期植被恢复实现高效增绿增汇,而耕地侵蚀沟因耕作扰动增强了保土保碳效应。[结论] 黑土区侵蚀沟具有明显的保土保碳、减蚀减排、增绿增汇等碳汇作用,通过合理配置工程及植物措施,充分发挥各项措施功能,能够显著提升黑土区侵蚀沟的碳汇作用与碳汇能力。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The carbon sink function of erosion gully control projects in black soil regions were analyzed in order to provide scientific support for understanding the mechanisms by which soil erosion affects carbon sink processes. [Methods] In autumn 2024, two erosion gullies in the low mountain and hilly area of eastern Jilin Province, with different treatment years (2017 and 2022) and site conditions (forest land and cultivated land), were selected as research objects. Their carbon sink effects were quantitatively evaluated from three aspects: soil conservation and carbon conservation, erosion reduction and emission reduction, and greening and carbon sink enhancement. Volume measurement, organic carbon content, and bulk density tests were conducted on the sediment accumulated in the gullies, and a tree-by-tree survey method was performed for trees and shrubs. [Results] ① The total amount of soil conservation, erosion and emission reduction, and greening and sink enhancement for gully I (forest land) was 1.602 0 t, including 0.564 1 t of soil and carbon conservation, 0.112 8 t of erosion and emission reduction, and 0.925 1 t of greening and carbon sink enhancement. For gully Ⅱ (cultivated land), the total amount was 1.474 8 t, with soil conservation and carbon conservation of 1.162 0 t, erosion and emission reduction of 0.232 4 t, and greening and carbon sink enhancement of 0.080 4 t. ② In gully I, the surface soil (0—20 cm) had significantly higher organic carbon content and soil carbon conservation than the other layers (p<0.05), indicating obvious surface accumulation, with the proportion of carbon conservation in the surface soil reaching a minimum of 42.29%. ③ The two gullies exhibited large differences in their annual average amounts of soil and carbon conservation, erosion and emission reduction, and greening and carbon sink enhancement. Treatment duration, land use type, and human activities were the main factors causing the differences in carbon sink effects. The forest erosion gully achieved efficient greening and carbon sequestration through long-term vegetation restoration, whereas the farmland erosion gully enhanced soil and carbon conservation due to cultivation disturbance. [Conclusion] Gullies in the black soil area have obvious carbon sink functions, including soil conservation and carbon conservation, erosion reduction and emission reduction, and greening and carbon sink enhancement. Through rational allocation of engineering and plant measures, the carbon sink function and the carbon sink capacity of these gullies can be significantly enhanced.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈月,张瑜,崔斌,岳航宇.吉林省低山丘陵区侵蚀沟治理的碳汇作用[J].水土保持通报,2026,46(1):29-36

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-15
  • 最后修改日期:2025-09-17
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-01
  • 出版日期: 2026-02-15