长江三峡工程快上缓上之争
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


CONTROVERSY OVER QUICK OR SLOW BUILDING ABOUT THREE GORGES PROJECT
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    长江三峡工程,是快上还是缓上,30多年来一直争论不休。少数人力主快上的理由,着眼于发电、拦洪、航运等局部的暂时利益,而对淹没损失、大量移民、泥沙淤积、诱发地震、地质灾难、生态恶化和毁灭文物古迹等重视不够;坚持缓上的大多数科学工作者和专家,引证了大量考察资料,分析了三峡地区和全长江流域的环境条件,吸取了国内外建坝的经验教训,研究了我国的国情和经济能力,并充分考虑了国际上的斗争形势,提出意义深远的忠告。

    Abstract:

    Controversy over quick or slow building of "Three Gorges Project" in Yangtze River have lasted over 30 years. The reasons of a few people who vigorously hold building the project are these to emphasize benefits right before eyes and of a few aspects, such as generating electricity, retaining flood and openning navigation, but that neglects the submergence loss, emigrant in a large amount, sedimentation, bringing out earthquake, geology calamity, ecological disaster and cultural relics destroy, etc.. However, most of scientists advocating to put off the "Three Gorges Project" analysed the environment of the Three Gorges Area and all of the Yangtze River Valley, drawn the lessons at all time and in all countries, and considered the special condition and ability in economy of our country. Meanwhile, they take the international struggling situation into full account after having quoted a vast amount of investigation data.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

.长江三峡工程快上缓上之争[J].水土保持通报,1986,(5):21-25

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-12-01
  • 出版日期: