ANUDEM和TIN两种建立DEM方法的对比研究
作者:
基金项目:

“十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目“水土流失动态监测与评价关键技术”(2006BAD09B05);黄委会治黄专项二级课题“区域水土流失模型试验研究”(2004SZ01-04)


Comparison of Hydro-geomorphology Representing Between DEMs by TINand ANUDEM Approaches
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • | |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对流域水文和土壤侵蚀定量模拟分析需要,对基于TIN和Hutchinson方法建立的DEM表现地形形态和起伏的能力进行了对比研究。结果表明,基于TIN建立的DEM始终存在一些平顶现象,一些较小的侵蚀沟被忽略,其上提取的河流不完全连续,多处出现多重线条河流,因而不能如实地反映地形起伏的细部特征。而基于ANUDEM建立的DEM,其派生等高线的形状与输入等高线吻合较好,较好地表现了地形的形态和起伏,对地形和坡度的反映更加连续和光滑,其上提取的河流信息基本与地形图上的河流一致。

    Abstract:

    Mainly considering the demand of regional soil erosion and hydrological modeling , the DEMs generated from TIN and Hutchinson’s method (ANUDEM) , and their representation of the hydro2geomorphology charac-teristics have been compared. The results show that , in the TIN DEM , there are inevitably flat hilltops , some eroded gullies have been ignored during TIN const ructing , the stream networks based on the DEM is not continu-ous , and multiplelines rivers exist . In Hutchinson method based DEM , the DEM derived contours match to the o-riginal input contours , and the relief and slope can be represented smoothly and continuously. Therefore , the hy-dro-geomorphological features can be represented correctly even no rivers input to drive ANUDEM.

    参考文献
    引证文献
    引证文献 [7]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

杨勤科,TimR. McVicar, Tom G. VanNiel,李领涛. ANUDEM和TIN两种建立DEM方法的对比研究[J].水土保持通报,2006,(6):84-88

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1381
  • 下载次数: 2211
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2006-07-25
  • 最后修改日期:2006-08-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-11-26