保护性耕作对地表径流及土壤侵蚀的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中澳合作项目ACIAR“提高甘肃黄土高原西部雨养农业系统生产力及其可持续性的研究”(LWR2/1999/094);国家科技支撑计划“黄土高原丘陵沟壑区保护性耕作技术集成研究与示范”(2006BAD15B06)


Runoff and Quantity of Soil Erosion Uunder Conservation Tillage System by Simulated Rainfall
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用人工模拟降雨方法对陇中黄土高原连续实施5 a的4种耕作措施:传统耕作(T),传统耕作结合秸秆还田(TS),免耕(NT),免耕加秸秆覆盖(NTS)下豌豆地收获后的径流起始时间、径流量、土壤侵蚀量进行了研究。结果表明,在降雨强度为85 mm/h的条件下,NTS可以延缓径流,减小径流强度。与NT,TS,T这3种处理比较,NTS的径流量分别降低了2.4%,12.1%,34.7%。入渗量分别增加了2.7%,13.6%,38.6%。径流出现时间分别延迟1.17,0.83,3.83 min。土壤侵蚀量减少了0.3%,17.7%,62.4%。可见,免耕秸秆覆盖的水土保持效应最为明显,传统耕作的方式极易发生土壤侵蚀。

    Abstract:

    Four tillage treatments were carried out for five years by simulated rainfall in the middle area of the Loess Plateau: traditional tillage(T), traditional tillage with straw incorporated(TS), no-tillage(NT), and no tillage with straw cover(NTS).Runoff starting time, amount of runoff, and amount of soil erosion were measured af ter harvest of pea.Under rainfall intensity of 85 mm/h, ru noff process was alleviated and the amou nt of ru noff was red uced using NTS.Compared to NT, TS, and T, the amounts of runoff under NTS were red uced by 2.4%, 12.1%, and 34.7%, respectively; infiltration rates were increased by 2.7%,13.6%, and 38.6%; runoff starting times were slowed down 1.17, 0.83, and 3.83 min; the amounts of soil erosion were red uced by 0.3%, 17.7%, and 62.4%.Therefore, the effects of soil and water conservation under NTS are most obvious and soil erosion is easily to take place u nder traditional tillage.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵君范,黄高宝,辛平,谢奎忠,许爱霞.保护性耕作对地表径流及土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持通报,2007,(6):16-19

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-20
  • 最后修改日期:2007-06-07
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-12-16
  • 出版日期: