激光衍射法与吸管法对东北黑土区土壤粒径分布测定的差异性研究
作者:
基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目“不同类型区土壤侵蚀过程及其机理”(2007CB407201);中国科学院西部行动计划(二期)项目“水文过程响应及其模拟”(KZCX2-XB2-05-03);西北农林科技大学创新团队计划项目“土壤侵蚀及其治理环境效应评价”(01140202)


Comparative Study of Particle Size Distribution by Laser Diffraction Method and Pipette Method in Black Soil Region of Northeast China
Author:
  • WANG Bin

    WANG Bin

    College of Resources and Environmental Sciences,Northwest A & F University,Yangling, Shaanxi 712100,China;State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau,Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China;
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • ZHENG Fen-li

    ZHENG Fen-li

    College of Resources and Environmental Sciences,Northwest A & F University,Yangling, Shaanxi 712100,China;State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau,Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China;
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • AN Juan

    AN Juan

    State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau,Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China;Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • LV Chun-hua

    LV Chun-hua

    College of Resources and Environmental Sciences,Northwest A & F University,Yangling, Shaanxi 712100,China;State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau,Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China;
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目前激光衍射法(laser diffraction method,LD)逐步被用于土壤颗粒粒径分布(particle size distribution, PSD)的分析,为了对比LD法和吸管法测定东北黑土区土壤PSD的差异性,采用LD法和吸管法分别对东北黑土区宾州河流域36个土壤剖面不同层次178个土壤样品的PSD值进行了测定与分析。结果表明,同吸管法相比,LD法低估了土壤的黏粒含量,平均低估幅度19.69%,而高估了土壤的粉粒和砂粒含量,平均高估幅度分别为14.66%和5.13%。LD法所得PSD结果依据美国土壤质地分类制判定的土壤质地,相对于吸管法总体由粉黏质偏向粉砂质方向。建立了LD法与吸管法测定PSD结果的转换模型,将LD法测定的PSD结果利用转换模型校正后,其测定的各土壤粒级同吸管法相比,准确度达96.97%~98.71%,判定土壤质地的准确率也达83.15%。

    Abstract:

    Laser diffraction method(LD method) has been regarded as an effective method of measuring soil particle size distribution( PSD) in recent years. In order to compare PSD difference in measurements by LD method and pipette method in black soil region, 178 soil samples collected from various layers of 36 soil profiles were analyzed by LD method and traditional pipette method. Results showed that,compared with pipette method,clay content by LD method was under-estimated by 19. 69 0 o,and silt and sand contents were overestimated by 14. 66%and 5. 13%,respectively. According to US soil texture classification, soil texture varied from silt and clay texture to sand and silt texture, compared with pipette method. For clay,silt and sand particles, three PSD transform models between LD method and pipette method were built. When the transform models were used to revise PSD by LD method, the accuracy of measured PSD was 96. 97%~98. 71%and the accuracy of determined soil texture classification reached 83. 15%by LD.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王彬,郑粉莉,安娟,吕春花.激光衍射法与吸管法对东北黑土区土壤粒径分布测定的差异性研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,(2):134-139,143

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2008-08-30
  • 最后修改日期:2008-12-30
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-11-26