浑河上游河岸带土壤微生物数量及酶活性特征
作者:
基金项目:

"十二五"国家科技支撑计划课题"高效可持续农林复合系统构建及调控技术研究"(2011BAD38B0603)


Soil Microbial Quantity and Soil Enzyme Activity Characteristics of Riparian Zone in Upper Reaches of Hunhe River
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [27]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了研究浑河上游河岸带土壤质量现状,采用实地调查与实验室分析相结合的方式,测定了其天然灌木草地、次生林、人工松林和玉米地的土壤微生物数量和酶活性特征。结果表明,土壤微生物数量呈现出在天然灌木草地和次生林中最多,人工松林次之,玉米地最少的趋势;细菌在土壤微生物类群中占绝对优势,比例为99.87%~99.94%;土壤蔗糖酶、脲酶、磷酸酶、多酚氧化酶、过氧化氢酶活性变化范围分别为12.95~76.43,0.35~1.80,1.32~6.39,0.35~1.61 mg/(g·d)及0.93~3.27 ml/(g·20 min);5种土壤酶活性呈现出在天然灌木草地和次生林中最多,人工松林次之,玉米地最少的趋势;相关性分析中,细菌数量与5种酶活性显著正相关,放线菌数量与除了过氧化氢酶之外的其他4种酶活性显著正相关,真菌和蔗糖酶、磷酸酶和多酚氧化酶活性显著正相关。4种植被河岸带中,天然灌木草地和次生林具有最高的微生物数量和土壤酶活性,土壤质量高,是很好的河岸带形式。

    Abstract:

    In order to study soil quality of riparian zone in the upper reaches of the Hunhe River, a field investigation combined with laboratory analysis was employed to determine soil microbial quantity and enzyme activity characteristics of natural shrub grassland, secondary forest, artificial pine forest and corn field. The four vegetation riparian zones, in order of decreasing soil microbial quantity, were natural shrub grassland and secondary forest, artificial pine forest, and corn field. Bacteria occupied the most in the soil microbial groups, with proportions of 99.87%~99.94%. The activities of soil invertase, urease, phosphatase, polyphenol oxidase and catalase were 12.95~76.43 mg/(g·d), 0.35~1.80, 1.32~6.39, 0.35~1.61 mg/(g·d) and 0.93~3.27 ml/(g·20 min), respectively. The four riparian zones, in order of decreasing activities of the five soil enzymes, were natural shrub grassland and secondary forest, artificial pine forest, and corn field. By correlation analysis, the quantity of bacteria had a significantly positive correlation with the activities of the five enzymes, the quantity of actinomyces had a significantly positive correlation with the activities of the soil enzymes except hydrogen peroxide enzyme, and the quantity of fungi had significantly positive correlation with the activity of sucrase, phosphatase and polyphenol oxidase. In the four vegetation riparian zones, natural shrub grassland and secondary forest had the greatest microbial quantity, highest soil enzyme activity, and best soil quality and therefore, they are very good forms of riparian zone.

    参考文献
    [1] Campbell A G, Franklin J F. Riparian vegetation in Oregon's Western Cascade Mountains:Composition, biomass, and autumn phenology[M]. Seattle:University of Washington Press, 1979:4-5.
    [2] Gregory S V, Swanson F J, Mckee W A, et al. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones[J]. Bioscience, 1991,41(8):540-551.
    [3] 陈吉泉.河岸植被特征及其在生态系统和景观中的作用[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(4):439-448.
    [4] Naiman R J, Decamps H, Pollock M. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity[J]. Ecological Applications, 1993,3(2):209-212.
    [5] 夏继红,严忠民.生态河岸带研究进展与发展趋势[J].河海大学学报:自然科学版,2004,32(3):252-255.
    [6] 刘占锋,傅伯杰,刘国华,等.土壤质量与土壤质量指标及评价[J].生态学报,2006,26(3):901-913.
    [7] 薛立,陈红跃,邝立刚.湿地松混交林地土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的研究[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(1):157-159.
    [8] 万忠梅,宋长春.土壤酶活性对生态环境的响应研究进展[J].土壤通报,2009,40(4):951-956.
    [9] 梁雷,刘峰,何丽,等.浑河上游不同类型农户氮负荷特征[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(10):2315-2322.
    [10] 张鸿龄,孙丽娜,罗庆,等.浑河流域水体污染的季节性变化及来源[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(1):119-125.
    [11] 张艳强,安立会,郑丙辉,等.浑河野生鲫鱼体内重金属污染水平与金属硫蛋白基因表达[J].生态毒理学报,2012,7(1):57-64.
    [12] 阎丽凤,石险峰,于立忠,等.沈阳地区河岸植被缓冲带对氮、磷的削减效果研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 2011,19(2):403-408.
    [13] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析手册[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978:62-93.
    [14] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤微生物研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1985:34-58.
    [15] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1986:157-241.
    [16] Stenberg B. Monitoring soil quality of arable land:Microbiological indicators[J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica(Section B):Soil and Plant Science, 1999,49(1):1-24.
    [17] Winding A, Hund-Rinke K, Rutgers M. The use of microorganisms in ecological soil classication and assessment concepts[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2005,62(2):230-248.
    [18] 陆梅,卫捷,韩智亮.滇池西岸4种针叶林的土壤微生物与酶活性[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(6):56-59.
    [19] 吕可,潘开文,王进闯,等.花椒叶浸提液对土壤微生物数量和土壤酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(9):1649-1654.
    [20] 郑诗樟,肖青亮,吴蔚东,等.丘陵红壤不同人工林型土壤微生物类群、酶活性与土壤理化性状关系的研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(1):57-61.
    [21] 赵聪,李勇,杨红军. 缙云山森林次生演替群落土壤微生物、酶活性和养分的研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(4):46-50.
    [22] 漆良华,张旭东,周金星,等.湘西北小流域不同植被恢复区土壤微生物数量、生物量碳氮及其分形特征[J].林业科学,2009,45(8):14-20.
    [23] Maxm C, Wood M, Jarvis S C. A microplate flurimetric assay for the study of enzyme diversity in soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2001,33(12):1633-1640.
    [24] Zornoza R, Guerrero C, Mataix-Solera J, et al. Assessing air-drying and rewetting pretreatment effect on some soil enzyme activities under Mediterranean conditions[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006,38(8):2125-2134.
    [25] 王芸,韩宾,史忠强,等.保护性耕作对土壤微生物特性及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(4):120-122.
    [26] 杨招弟,蔡立群,张仁陟,等.不同耕作方式对旱地土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2008,39(3):514-517.
    [27] 丁克强,骆永明,刘世亮,等.黑麦草对菲污染土壤修复的初步研究[J].土壤,2002,4(4):233-236.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

孔涛,吴祥云,赵雪淞,刘民,黄静,张丹.浑河上游河岸带土壤微生物数量及酶活性特征[J].水土保持通报,2014,(1):123-128

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1200
  • 下载次数: 1399
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-28
  • 最后修改日期:2013-05-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-03-29