基于清洁发展机制的县南沟流域商品型生态农业系统优化
作者:
基金项目:

中国清洁发展机制基金项目"黄土高原退耕区农户低碳生产模式与政策研究"(2012027);科技部"十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD31B05)


Optimization of Ecological Agricultural System with Commodity Based on Clean Development Mechanism
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [18]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对县南沟流域因资源利用率低导致的农业产业与农业资源系统运行相悖,商品型生态农业系统链网结构不完整等问题,在清洁发展机制(CDM)理念下,根据可能发展路径,设置了商品型生态农业发展的3个阶段5种情景并进行了系统优化。结果表明,商品型生态农业系统优化后,经济效益得到了不同程度提高,土地利用结构发生了重要变化。阶段Ⅰ(情景A)、阶段Ⅱ(情景B1,B2)、阶段Ⅲ(情景C1,C2)的经济效益比现实状况分别提高了34.4%,53.0%~55.2%,72.8%~73.7%;基于CDM下的农业经济系统与农业生态系统优化耦合阶段的农林牧土地利用结构为1:12.6:4.4,林地比重较阶段Ⅰ、阶段Ⅱ提高了;商品型生态农业系统发展过程表现出"现状发展态势→农业生态经济系统链网构建阶段→农业经济系统与农业生态系统优化耦合阶段"的发展趋势。

    Abstract:

    The agricultural resources of Xiannangou watershed were not used efficiently, the system of agricultural practices grow inconsistently with agricultural resources, and the chain network structure of ecological agricultural system with commodity(EASC) was incomplete. In order to solve these problems, Three phases and five scenarios of the possible development path of ecological agriculture with commodity(EAC) was set on the principle of clean development mechanism(CDM), and further efforts were made to optimize the EASC. The results showed that the economic benefits of each phase had been improved and the land use structure had also been significantly changed after the optimized of EASC. The economic benefits of phase Ⅰ to Ⅲ had been improved by 34.4%, 53.0~55.2%, and 72.8~73.7%, respectively comparing with the actual state. On the principle of CDM, the coupling of agricultural economic system and agricultural ecosystem, a better land use structure(agriculture:forestry:animal husbandry=1:12.6:4.4) was produced, implying that the proportion of forestry increased compared to phase Ⅰ and phase Ⅱ.The development progress of EASC with the development trend of the actual state→the modified chain network construction of EASC→the optimization of agricultural economic system and agricultural ecosystem coupling has its historical inevitability.

    参考文献
    [1] 王继军,权松安,谢永生,等.流域生态经济系统建设模式研究[J].生态经济,2005(10):136-140.
    [2] 李奇睿,王继军,郭满才.基于结构方程模型的安塞县商品型生态农业系统耦合关系[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(16):240-247.
    [3] 李奇睿,王继军.基于退耕背景下安塞县商品型生态农业系统演变过程分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):97-101.
    [4] 崔绍芳.退耕还林工程驱动下的安塞县商品型生态农业实施效果评价[D].陕西杨凌:中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心,2013.
    [5] 李惠茹.陕北县南沟流域景观格局及动态研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2011.
    [6] 王继军,权松安,郭满才.退耕还林还草中建立生态系统与经济系统"弹性资源"初论[J].水土保持通报,2004,24(5):95-98.
    [7] 唐华俊,李哲敏.基于中国居民平衡膳食模式的人均粮食需求量研究[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(11):2315-2327.
    [8] 赵丹,李锋,王如松.基于生态绿当量的城市土地利用结构优化:以宁国市为例[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):6242-6250.
    [9] 毛文永.生态环境影响评价概论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2003.
    [10] Perry J H, Ryan R J. The effect of urban leaf area on summertime urban surface kinetic temperatures:A Terre Haute case study[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2007,6(2):63-72.
    [11] 吴钦孝.黄土高原的林草资源和适宜覆盖率[J].林业科学,2000,36(6):6-7.
    [12] 黄怀雄,赵红艳.长株潭地区森林固碳释氧功能价值评价[J].林业调查规划,2010,35(2):136-138.
    [13] 马长欣,刘建军,康博文,等.1999-2003年陕西省森林生态系统固碳释氧服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报,2010,30(6):1412-1422.
    [14] 刘忠琛,刘正梅.肉羊舍饲高效养殖技术要点[J].养殖与饲料,2003(5):15-17.
    [15] 圈养舍饲绒山羊调查研究课题组.绒山羊舍饲圈养技术研究:基于陕西省榆林市推行绒山羊舍饲圈养的实证分析[J].中国畜牧杂志,2008(S):184-191.
    [16] 刘吉利,程序,谢光辉,等.收获时间对玉米秸秆产量与燃料品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(6):2229-2236.
    [17] 折凤霞,郝明德,臧逸飞.黄土高原沟壑区苜蓿生产力及养分特性的研究[J].草业学报,2013,22(2):313-317.
    [18] 高阳,程积民,刘伟.黄土高原地区不同类型天然草地群落学特征[J].草业科学,2011,28(6):1066-1069.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

顾文,王继军,张雯佳.基于清洁发展机制的县南沟流域商品型生态农业系统优化[J].水土保持通报,2014,(6):146-152,161

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1599
  • 下载次数: 1177
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-20
  • 最后修改日期:2014-02-27
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-04-05