成都平原不同秸秆还田模式下稻麦轮作农田系统能值分析
作者:
基金项目:

四川省科技支撑计划项目"农田有机质提升关键技术应用与推广"(2013NZ0027)


Emergy Analysis of Farmland Eco-system with Different Straw Returning Modes of Rice-Wheat Rotation in Chengdu Plain
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [27]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探索成都平原高产条件下稻麦轮作农田系统适宜的秸秆还田模式,为区域秸秆资源的农业循环再利用和农田系统的可持续发展提供一定的实践指导与科学依据。[方法] 在田间定位试验中,设置了常规施肥(CF)、秸秆半量还田(CFS1)、秸秆全量还田(CFS2)和秸秆1.5倍量还田(CFS3)4种施肥模式,应用能值分析方法探讨了不同农田系统的能值投入产出总量、结构及综合指标的变化。[结果] (1)从能值结构看,较CF模式,秸秆还田模式降低了农田系统能值投入中工业辅助能的比重,增强了系统的自给能力,并提高了系统总能值产出;(2)从能值指标看,较CF模式,秸秆还田模式提高了农田系统的净能值产出率、能值投入率、能值反馈率、能值生产力和能值-劳动生产率,降低了环境负载率,有效提升了农田系统的可持续发展性能,增强了系统的发展潜力,其中CFS2和CFS3模式的养分物质内部循环利用率较高,环境负载率较小,有利于农田系统的持续、高效运行。[结论] CFS2和CFS3模式是成都平原稻麦轮作农田较优的秸秆还田生产模式。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To find out a suitable straw returning mode for the rice-wheat rotation ecosystem with high yield in Chengdu Plain, and to offer a scientific basis for the efficient operation of regional farmland system.[Methods] Four treatments in field experiment was designed according to applied straw quantities, i.e., chemical fertilizer only(CF), chemical fertilizer plus a half of straw returning(CFS1), chemical fertilizer plus total straw returning(CFS2), chemical fertilizer plus 1.5 times of straw returning(CFS3). Based on emergy analysis method, we studied the changes of total amount of emergy input and output, the structure of emergy input and output and the emergy indexes among different fertilization treatments.[Results] (1) The results showed that, as compared to CF mode, other straw returning modes lowered the proportion of the non-renewable industrial assistant emergy to the total emergy input and increased the level of self-supply ability and the total emergy output. (2) From the perspective of the emergy indexes, as compared to the CF mode, straw returning modes had higher levels of net emergy yield ratio, emergy input ratio, emergy feedback ratio, emergy productivity and emergy-labor productivity, and had lower levels of environmental load ratio. Straw returning modes effectively improve the sustainable development ability of farmland system, especially CFS2 and CFS3 modes had the lower environmental load ratio and the higher emergy sustainable index.[Conclusion] Modes of CFS2 and CFS3 are the suitable straw returning modes under a rice-wheat rotation in Chengdu Plain.

    参考文献
    [1] Liu Hui, Jiang Gaoming, Zhuang Huiyong, et al. Distribution, utilization structure and potential of biomass resources in rural China:With special references of crop residues[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12(5):1402-1418.
    [2] 高利伟,马林,张卫峰,等.中国作物秸秆养分资源数量估算及其利用状况[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(7):173-179.
    [3] 谢光辉,王晓玉,任兰天.中国作物秸秆资源评估研究现状[J].生物工程学报,2010,26(7):855-863.
    [4] 曹国良,张小曳,王亚强,等.中国区域农田秸秆露天焚烧排放量的估算[J].科学通报,2007,52(15):1826-1831.
    [5] 高雪松.秸秆循环利用模式,物流能流分析及功能评价[D].四川 雅安:四川农业大学,2011.
    [6] 曹国良,张小曳,王丹,等.中国大陆生物质燃烧排放的污染物清单[J].中国环境科学,2005,25(4):389-393.
    [7] 黄成毅.成都平原耕地资源系统协同性分析与调控研究[D].四川 雅安:四川农业大学,2011.
    [8] 肖瑶.四川省秸秆焚烧与利用分析[J].绿色科技,2013(11):72-74.
    [9] Odum H T, Nilsson P O. Environmental accounting-EMERGY and environmental decision making[J]. Forest Science, 1997, 43(2):305-305.
    [10] Castellini C, Bastianoni S, Granai C, et al. Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach:Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 114(2):343-350.
    [11] 蓝盛芳.钦佩,陆宏芳.生态经济系统能值分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002:76,383-384.
    [12] 刘玉振.农业生态系统能值分析与模式构建:以开封市为例[D].河南 开封:河南大学,2007.
    [13] 骆世明.农业生态学(面向2l世纪课程教材)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001:449-451.
    [14] 王闰平.基于能值的山西省农业生态系统动态分析[D].湖南 长沙:湖南农业大学,2009.
    [15] 王金照.基于能值分析的陕西小麦,玉米,苹果,大枣比较优势研究[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2011.
    [16] 蒋碧,李明,吴喜慧,等.关中平原农田生态系统不同秸秆还田模式的能值分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2013,30(6):178-185.
    [17] 易定宏.基于能值理论的农业生态系统分析[D].湖南 长沙:湖南农业大学,2010.
    [18] 朱玉林.基于能值的湖南农业生态系统可持续发展研究[D].湖南 长沙:中南林业科技大学,2010.
    [19] 董孝斌,高旺盛.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区典型县域的能值分析[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(1):89-92.
    [20] 邢开成,龚宇,王璞.华北平原集约农区种植业生态经济系统的能值分析:以河北沧州为例[J].生态环境,2007,16(2):592-597.
    [21] 熊凯,杨钢桥,蔡银莺.基于能值理论的武汉市农田生态系统能值分析[J].农业现代化研究,2010,31(6):738-741.
    [22] 赵桂慎,姜浩如,吴文良.高产粮区农田生态系统可持续性的能值分析[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(8):318-323.
    [23] 付晓,吴钢,尚文艳,等.辽宁省朝阳市农业生态经济系统能值分析[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(8):902-906.
    [24] 孙奇,孙鹏媛,高永生,等.基于能值分析的河南省耕地生态经济系统可持续利用研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2010(3):37-42.
    [25] Pan Genxing, Zhou Ping, Li Zhipeng, et al. Combined inorganic/organic fertilization enhances N efficiency and increases rice productivity through organic carbon accumulation in a rice paddy from the Tai Lake region, China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2009, 131(3):274-280.
    [26] Zhao Yunchen, Wang Ping, Li Jianlong, et al. The effects of two organic manures on soil properties and crop yields on a temperate calcareous soil under a wheat-maize cropping system[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2009, 31(1):36-42.
    [27] 戴志刚,鲁剑巍,李小坤,等.不同作物还田秸秆的养分释放特征试验[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(6):272-276.
    引证文献
    引证文献 [1]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

黄春,邓良基,杨娟,周伟.成都平原不同秸秆还田模式下稻麦轮作农田系统能值分析[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):336-343

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:993
  • 下载次数: 1430
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-06
  • 最后修改日期:2014-03-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-04-05