退化演替对高山草地植被和土壤理化特性影响
作者:
基金项目:

黑龙江省科技攻关项目"低山丘陵区水土流失综合治理示范与效益研究"(CB08C204-02)


Effect of Degradation Succession on Vegetation and Soil Physical and Chemical Characteristics in Alpine Grassland
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [11]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 分析3种不同草地退化阶段(轻度退化,中度退化和重度退化)草地植被和土壤理化特性的变化规律,为类似区域退化草地植被恢复提供有效途径。[方法] 野外植被调查、土壤取样和室内分析。[结果] 草地退化不同阶段草地植物群落组成和物种多样性均有差异,退化对草地土壤理化特性有明显影响。重度退化草地土壤容重显著高于轻度退化草地(p<0.05)。轻度和中度退化样地0-10 cm土壤空隙度显著高于重度退化草地。重度退化草地的土壤有机质、全碳、全钾、全磷和有效钾均明显小于轻度退化草地(p<0.05),但土壤pH值和有效氮含量没有显著变化。[结论] 高山草地退化演替对该区土壤物理特性具有显著影响。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The changes of soil physical and chemical properties in three levels of degraded grasslands(light degradation grasslands, middle degradation grasslands and heavy degradation grasslands) in alpine grassland in the Qilian Mountain were studied to provide references for the restoration of grasslands in analogous area. [Methods] Vegetation investigation and soil sampling were conducted and the samples were assayed. [Results] Obvious differences were observed in community composition and species diversity. The soil physical and chemical properties under different degraded grasslands were affected by degradation level. The soil bulk density in the heavy degraded grassland was significantly higher(p<0.05) than that of light degraded grassland. The content of soil total porosity of 0-10 cm layer in light degradation grassland was significantly higher than that of heavy degraded grassland. The contents of organic matter, total K, total P and available K in heavy degraded grassland were obviously lower(p<0.05) than those of lighter degraded grassland, but there were no significant differences in the content of pH value and available N. [Conclusion] Soil physical and chemical characteristics were significantly affected by vegetation degraded succession in alpine grassland.

    参考文献
    [1] 柳小妮,孙九林,张德罡,等.东祁连山不同退化阶段高寒草甸群落结构与植物多样性特征研究[J].草业学报,2008,17(4):1-11.
    [2] 赵成章,樊胜岳,殷翠琴.祁连山区天然草原退化原因分析与可持续利用对策[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(2):207-210.
    [3] 马兴祥,尹东.祁连山草原气候和草地资源开发利用[J]. 草原与草坪,2000,90(3):37-40.
    [4] 孙涛,赵景学,田莉华,等.草地蝗虫发生原因及可持续管理对策[J].草业学报,2010,19(3):220-227.
    [5] 高英志,韩兴国,汪诗平.放牧对草原土壤的影响[J].生态学报,2004,24(4):790-797.
    [6] 曹静娟,尚占环,郭瑞英,等.甘肃臭草入侵对亚高山草地土壤碳氮库的影响[J].草原与草坪,2010,30(5):11-15.
    [7] 赵锦梅,高超,张德罡.祁连山东段不同退化高寒草甸土壤有机碳密度研究[J].草地学报,2010,18(1):21-25.
    [8] 丁玲玲,祁彪,尚占环,等.东祁连山不同高寒草地型土壤微生物数量分布特征研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(6):2104-2111.
    [9] 黄德青,于兰,张耀生,等.祁连山北坡天然草地地上生物量及其与土壤水分关系的比较研究[J].草业学报,2011,20(3):20.
    [10] Wu Gaolin, Liu Zhenheng, Zhang Lei, et al. Effects of artificial grassland establishment on soil nutrients and carbon properties in a black-soil-type degraded grassland[J]. Plant and Soil, 2010, 333(1/2):469-479.
    [11] Dong Shikui, Liu Wen, Li Yuanyuan, et al. Soil-quality effects of grassland degradation and restoration on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2012, 76(6):2256-2264.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李立新,陈英智.退化演替对高山草地植被和土壤理化特性影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):40-42,48

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:977
  • 下载次数: 1244
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-30
  • 最后修改日期:2015-01-31
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-04-05