不同植物边坡的糙率系数和水力学特征参数
作者:
基金项目:

国家林业公益性行业科研专项"建设工程损毁林地植被修复关键技术研究与示范"(200904030)


Roughness Coefficient and Hydraulics Characteristics Parameters of Slopes with Different Plants
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 研究北方土石山区植物边坡糙度,为坡面生态防护的最佳植物配置选择提供依据。[方法] 在北京市昌平区试验基地设置多组不同地表类型的径流小区,设计了控制流速、流量的野外放水冲刷试验。[结果] (1) 与乔灌植被相比较,草本植被对地表径流流速具有良好的阻滞作用,毛白杨对地表流速有加速作用。(2) 草地的平均糙率系数最大,裸地最小。对裸地进行处理后发现,铺设枯枝物,可以有效提高地表糙率系数值,通过砾石压盖处理的地表糙率系数并未有明显改变。(3) 各类地表下垫面的雷诺系数Re均介于21.34~23.49之间,枯落物小区Re最大,毛白杨小区Re最小,水流均为层流,紊动性弱;弗劳德数Fr介于0.35~2.55之间;阻力系数f介于1.03~54.43之间。[结论] 枯落物和草地可以有效减缓地表径流流速;毛白杨下垫面防蚀功能最弱。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] In order to determine the optimal plant configuration of slope ecological protection, we designed a washout test by control the velocity and flow of water in runoff plots of different surface type. [Methods] Based on experimental data, we studied the effect of different surface types on both surface roughness coefficient and hydraulics characteristic parameters. [Results] (1) The effect of herbaceous vegetation on the velocity of the block is better than shrub tree species. Populus tomentosa promote the surface velocity. (2) The largest average roughness coefficient is in the lawn plot, the smallest is bare plot. Laying litter in bare ground can effectively increase the surface roughness coefficient value and there is no significantly change by laying gravel. (3) Reynolds coefficient(Re) is 21.34~23.49 and the largest is the litter surface, the smallest is Populus tomentosa surface. Water flow is laminar flow, the turbulence is weak, Froude coefficient(Fr) is 0.35~2.55, Darcy-Weisbach resistance coefficient(f) is 1.03~54.43. [Conclusion] The bare land with litters and grassland surface can effectively resist runoff scour and the Populus tomentosa underlying surface has the potential to cause the most amount of soil erosion.

    参考文献
    [1] Nearing M, Simanton R, Norton D, et al. Soil erosion by surface water flow on a stony, semiarid hill slope[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1999,24(2):677-686.
    [2] Foster G R, Hugins L F, Meyer L D. A laboratory study of rill hydraulics (I):Velocity relationships[J]. Transactions of ASAE, 1984,27(3):790-796.
    [3] 蔡强国,刘纪根,郑明国.黄土丘陵沟壑区中大流域侵蚀产沙模型与尺度转换研究[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(4):132-135.
    [4] 杨海龙,朱金兆,齐实,等.三峡库区森林流域林地的地表糙率系数[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27(01):38-41.
    [5] Morgan R P C. Soil erosion[M]. New York:Longman Inc, 1997.
    [6] 吴持恭.水力学[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,1982:94-97.
    [7] Li Gang, Abrahams A D, Atkinson J F. Correction factors in the determination of mean velocity of overland flow[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1996,21(6):509-515.
    [8] 刘青泉,李家春,陈力,等.坡面流及土壤侵蚀动力学(Ⅰ):坡面流[J].力学进展,2004(3):360-365.
    [9] 张洪江,北原曜,远藤泰造.几种林木枯落物对糙率系数n值的影响[J].水土保持学报,1994,8(4):4-10.
    [10] 吴淑芳,吴普特,冯浩,等.标准坡面人工草地减流减沙效应及其坡面流水力学机理研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2007,29(3):99-104.
    [11] 郑子成,吴发启,何淑勤.降雨条件下土壤物理性质对地表糙度变化的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2006,34(11):185-189.
    [12] 翟艳宾,吴发启,王健,等.不同人工糙率床面水力学特性的试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):39-43.
    [13] Govers G. Relationships between discharge, velocity, and flow area for rills eroding loose, non-layered material s[J]. Earth Surface Processes Land forms, 1992,17(5):515-528.
    [14] 张光辉.坡面薄层流水动力学特性的实验研究[J].水科学进展,2002,3(3):159-165.
    [15] 王宏,蔡强国,朱远达.应用EUROSEM模型对三峡库区陡坡地水力侵蚀的模拟研究[J].地理研究,2003,22(5):580-585.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘慧博,高二鹏,王冰洁,杨海龙,张嫱,王志刚,张成梁.不同植物边坡的糙率系数和水力学特征参数[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):64-68

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1177
  • 下载次数: 2240
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-06
  • 最后修改日期:2014-06-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-04-05