沙化封禁区农田生态系统服务价值变化及其影响因素——以河西走廊8县市为例
作者:
基金项目:

甘肃省林业厅委托项目“甘肃省沙化土地封禁保护补助试点区经济效益检测和评估”(14GSLY01)


Service Value and Influence Factors Analysis of Farmland Meta-ecosystem in Land Desertification Control Areas -A Case Study of Eight County in Hexi Corridor
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [22]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]对沙化封禁区农田生态系统服务进行研究,为干旱区生态安全和农户生计可持续发展提供支持。[方法]运用生态经济学方法和多元逐步回归模型,据此揭示河西走廊沙化封禁区所在8县市农田生态系统服务价值变化以及影响因素。[结果]①沙化封禁区农田生态系统单位面积服务价值由19 966元/hm2增长到21 511元/hm2,增加了1 545元/hm2,年均增幅0.58%,原材料生产、废物处理、土壤形成和保护服务、食物生产是主要贡献类型;②农田生态系统总服务价值由29.40亿元增长到42.49亿元,增长了13.09亿元,年均增幅为2.88%,基本服务价值、社会保障服务价值大于水资源消耗服务价值和环境污染服务价值,但是水资源消耗和环境污染服务价值的增长速度明显加快;③ 8县市农田生态系统单位面积服务价值变化存在空间和类型差异,主要受农业生产总值、农民人均收入、化肥使用量、经济作物面积、粮食单产的影响。[结论]生态退化逆转对大部分县市的农田生态服务价值产生积极影响,但农田水资源消耗和环境污染效应不断增大,导致沙化土地逆转的脆弱性仍然较高。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] It is necessary to study farmland meta-ecosystem service value to reflect the region ecosystem safe and farmer livelihood sustainable in arid area.[Methods]This paper calculated farmland meta-ecosystem value and analyzed the influence factors of eight county protection of desertification land perimeter of Hexi Corridor in the arid region by ecological economic method and multiple regression.[Results] The result showed that farmland meta-ecosystem unit area service value increased from 19 966 yuan/hm2 to 21 511 yuan/hm2, the increment was 1 545 yuan/hm2, the annual average growth was 0.58%. Raw material production, waste treatment, soil formation, erosion control and food production were the main increased items. Farmland meta-ecosystem total value increased from 2.94×109 yuan to 4.25×109 yuan,the increment was 1.31×109 yuan, the annual average growth rate was 2.88%. The quantity of basic service value and social security function value had greater increases than environment pollution service value and water consumption function value had, but the increase rates of environment pollution service value and water consumption function value were faster than those of basic service value and social security function value. The changes of farmland meta-ecosystem unit area service value of the eight countries had spatial and type differences, Except of Dunhuang City, farmland meta-ecosystem total service values of seven countries increased. The variation of farmland meta-ecosystem service value in the study area was mainly affected by grass agriculture production, rural per capital income, chemical fertilizer consumption, scale economic crops and grain yield per hectare.[Conclusion] The Reversion of ecological degradation has positive influence on farmland meta-ecosystem value of most country, but environment pollution and water consumption were increasing constantly, for that reason, the vulnerability of land desertification reverse trend is still high.

    参考文献
    [1] 谢高地,肖玉.农田生态系统服务及价值的研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(6):645-651.
    [2] Costanza R, Ralph D A, de Groot Rudolf D G, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
    [3] Wood S, Sebastian K, Scherr S J. Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems:Agroecosystems[M]. Washington:International Food Policy Research Institute and World Resources Institute, 2000.
    [4] Pretty J, Ball A. Agricultural influences on carbon emissions and sequestration:A review of evidence and the emerging trading options[R]. Essex:Centre for Environment and Society, University of Essex, 2001:211-223.
    [5] Holmund C, Harmmer M. Ecosytem, service generated by fish populations[J]. Ecological Economic, 1989,29(2):253-268.
    [6] 欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-640.
    [7] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
    [8] 孙新章,周海林,谢高地.中国农田生态系统的服务功能及其经济价值[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(4):55-60.
    [9] 黄璜.湖南境内隐形水库与水库的集雨功能[J].湖南农业大学学报,1997,23(6):499-503.
    [10] Zhang W, Ricketts T H, Kremen C, et al. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,64(2):253-260.
    [11] Foley J A, De Fries R, Asner G P, et al. Global consequences of land use[J]. Science, 2005,309(5734):570-574.
    [12] 张宏锋,欧阳志云,郑华,等.玛纳斯河流域农田生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].中国生态农业学报.2009,17(6):1259-1264.
    [13] 乔旭宁,顾羊羊,唐宏,等.渭干河流域农田生态系统服务价值变化及其影响因素分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(2):237-245.
    [14] 岳东霞,杜军,巩杰,等.民勤绿洲农田生态系统服务价值变化及其影响因子的回归分析[J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2567-2575.
    [15] 石福习,宋长春,赵成章,等.河西走廊山地-绿洲-荒漠复合农田生态系统服务价值变化及其影响因子[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(5):1599-1604.
    [16] 肖玉,谢高地,安凯,等.华北平原小麦-玉米农田生态系统服务评价[J].中国生态农业学报.2011,19(2):429-435.
    [17] 祁兴芬.区域农田生态系统正、负服务价值时空变化及影响因素分析:以山东省为例[J].农业现代化研究,2013,34(5):622-626.
    [18] 韦惠兰,谭柳香.沙化土地封禁保护行为动因的经济分析[J].生态经济,2016,32(1):197-200.
    [19] 甘肃省林业厅.甘肃省第五次荒漠化和沙化监测情况公报[R].甘肃兰州:甘肃省林业厅,2016.
    [20] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1245.
    [21] 陈同斌,曾希柏,胡清秀.中国化肥利用率的区域分异[J].地理学报,2002,7(5):531-538.
    [22] 韦惠兰,周夏伟.封禁保护区农户对沙化土地治理的认知度及影响因素实证分析:基于甘肃省659个农户调查数据的对比分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(7):33-37.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    引证文献 [1]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

韦惠兰,罗万云.沙化封禁区农田生态系统服务价值变化及其影响因素——以河西走廊8县市为例[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(6):189-196

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-17
  • 最后修改日期:2017-06-04
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-01-19