干旱荒漠区排矸场不同覆盖类型对土壤水分蒸发的影响
作者:
中图分类号:

S157.2

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目“西北干旱荒漠区煤炭基地生态安全保障技术”(2017YFC0504405);内蒙古自治区科技重大专项项目“重点区域荒漠化过程与生态修复研究与示范”(zdzx2018058)


Effects of Different Mulching Modes on Soil Moisture Evaporation at Gangue Fields in Arid Desert Regions
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [25]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 在水分匮乏的干旱荒漠区煤矿废弃地植被恢复过程中,研究不同边坡覆盖模式对土壤水分蒸发的影响,为干旱荒漠区矿区废弃地生态恢复模式优化与完善植被恢复技术提供科学依据。[方法] 以中国西北干旱荒漠区煤炭基地废弃地——排矸场为研究对象,研究不同覆盖类型排矸场边坡土壤水分蒸发和表层土壤水分的变化。试验设置了草帘、生态毯和液态地膜3种覆盖类型,以无覆盖为对照。[结果] 干旱荒漠区煤矿排矸场边坡表层土壤含水量基本呈随着坡位降低而增加的变化规律;蒸发试验进行初期各覆盖处理的土壤日蒸发量较大,随着时间推移日蒸发量逐渐降低,草帘覆盖下的平均土壤日蒸发量最低,与无覆盖处理之间的变化差异达到显著水平(p<0.05);3种覆盖与无覆盖处理下的土壤水分累积蒸发量在排矸场边坡的不同坡位均表现出逐步上升的规律,无覆盖措施的土壤累积蒸发量增加较明显,草帘覆盖、液膜覆盖和生态毯覆盖措施下的土壤累积蒸发量分别比无覆盖措施减少了38.4%,24.2%和20.6%,坡面覆盖处理的土壤累积蒸发过程符合线性函数关系。[结论] 在草帘、生态毯和液态地膜3种覆盖类型中,草帘覆盖下的土壤含水量较高,草帘是减少边坡表层土壤水分蒸发量最为适合的覆盖措施。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The effects of different mulching modes on soil water evaporation were studied during the vegetation restoration of a coal mine wasteland in an arid desert area in order to provide a scientific basis for the optimization of the ecological restoration model of abandoned land in arid desert areas, and for the improvement of vegetation restoration technology.[Methods] The influence of different mulching modes on the evaporation of soil moisture and the soil moisture content were investigated on a dump slope of a gangue field in an arid desert region. Bare land was used as a control. The tested mulching modes included straw curtain mulching, eco-mat mulching, and liquid film mulching.[Results] The moisture content of surface soil increased with a decrease in the slope position of the dump slope. The daily evaporation capacity of the soil was relatively high during the early evaporation period, but decreased gradually over time. The average daily evaporation capacity of the soil was the lowest for the straw curtain mulching mode, which differed significantly (p<0.05) from that of bare land. The cumulative evaporation capacity of the soil increased gradually at different slope positions of the dump slope under the different mulching modes. The cumulative evaporation capacity of the soil in the bare land substantially increased. The cumulative evaporation capacity of soil under the straw curtain mulching, liquid film mulching, and eco-mat mulching modes decreased by 38.4%, 24.2%, and 20.6%, respectively, compared with that of the bare land. There was a linear relationship between the cumulative evaporation capacity of the soil and time under the different mulching modes.[Conclusion] The moisture content under the straw curtain mulching mode was higher than that under the liquid film and eco-mat mulching modes. Straw curtain mulching could provide the moat reasonable mulching model for the dump slope of the gangue field.

    参考文献
    [1] 卫智军,李青丰,贾鲜艳,等.矿业废弃地的植被恢复与重建[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(4):172-175.
    [2] Krauss S L, Sinclair E A, Bussell J D, et al. An ecological genetic delineation of local seed-source provenance for ecological restoration[J]. Ecology and Evolution,2013,3(7):2138-2149.
    [3] 张绍良,米家鑫,侯湖平,等.矿山生态恢复研究进展:基于连续三届的世界生态恢复大会报告[J].生态学报,2018,38(15):5611-5619.
    [4] Guo Donggang, Zhao Bingqing, Shangguan Tieliang, et al. Dynamic parameters of plant communities partially reflect the soil quality improvement in eco-reclamation area of an opencast coal mine[J]. Clean:Soil, Air, Water, 2013,41:1018-1026.
    [5] 台培东,孙铁珩,贾宏宇,等.草原地区露天矿排土场土地复垦技术研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(3):90-93.
    [6] Tongway D J, Valentin C, Seghieri J. Banded vegetation patterning in arid and semiarid environments[M]. New York, NY:Springer New York, 2001.
    [7] 杨勤学,赵冰清,郭东罡.中国北方露天煤矿区植被恢复研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(4):1152-1157.
    [8] Hann M J, Morgan R P C. Evaluating erosion control measures for biorestoration between the time of soil reinstatement and vegetation establishment[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2006,31(5):589-597.
    [9] Davies K, Fullen M A, Booth C A. A pilot project on the potential contribution of palm-mat geotextiles to soil conservation[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2006,31(5):561-569.
    [10] 骆汉,赵廷宁,彭贤锋,等.公路边坡绿化覆盖物水土保持效果试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(5):63-70.
    [11] 蔡永坤,李毅,冯浩.不同砂石覆盖度和粒径对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):273-277.
    [12] 赵永敢,王婧,李玉义,等.秸秆隔层与地覆膜盖有效抑制潜水蒸发和土壤返盐[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(23):109-117.
    [13] 赵文举,马宏,郁文,等.不同覆盖模式对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2016,34(6):539-544.
    [14] 周玉喜.宁夏羊场湾煤矿水土保持设施及其技术评估[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(5):114-115.
    [15] 孙宏勇,刘昌明,张永强,等.微型蒸发器测定土面蒸发的试验研究[J].水利学报,2004,35(8):114-118.
    [16] 王双菊.秸秆还田条件下潜水埋深对土壤水分及蒸发的影响[D]. 江苏扬州:扬州大学,2013.
    [17] 杨宪龙,魏孝荣,邵明安.不同规格微型蒸渗仪测定土壤蒸发的试验研究[J].土壤通报,2017,48(2):343-350.
    [18] 刘艳萍,珊丹,何京丽,等.一种蒸渗仪:中国,ZL 201921121002.0[P].2020-04-17.
    [19] 平全荣.旱地农业覆盖栽培技术研究应用进展与展望[J].山西农业科学,2008,36(2):63-66.
    [20] Riley S J. Aspects of the differences in the erodibility of the waste rock dump and natural surfaces, Ranger Uranium Mine, Northern Territory, Australia[J]. Applied Geography, 1995,15(4):309-323.
    [21] 郭明明,王文龙,李建明,等.神府矿区弃土弃渣体侵蚀特征及预测[J].土壤学报,2015,52(5):1044-1057.
    [22] 吕刚,刘雅卓,李叶鑫,等.露天煤矿排土场边坡表层土壤水分物理性质空间变异特征[J].土壤通报,2018,49(1):69-77.
    [23] 冀宏,黄雄,郑健,等.不同覆盖条件对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].节水灌溉,2010(4):29-32.
    [24] 答竹君,艾应伟,宋婷,等.道路边坡土壤水分空间和季节变异性分析[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):72-75.
    [25] 马风云,李新荣,张景光,等.沙坡头人工固沙植被土壤水分空间异质性[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(5):789-795.
    引证文献
    引证文献 [1]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

珊丹,荣浩,刘艳萍,梁占岐,张欣,石红标.干旱荒漠区排矸场不同覆盖类型对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(5):15-20

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:718
  • 下载次数: 918
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-09
  • 最后修改日期:2020-07-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-11-17