库布齐沙漠北缘机械沙障对地表土壤可蚀性的影响
作者:
中图分类号:

S288

基金项目:

国家重点研发专项“不同气候区固沙新材料研发、筛选与施配技术及效果研究”(2018YFC0507101);内蒙古自治区科技重大专项课题“浑善达克沙地沙地植被快速营建技术研究”;内蒙古自治区研究生科研创新项“不同年限麦草方格沙障近地表风蚀沙埋特征及其风沙动力学过程研究”


Effects of Mechanical Sand Barriers on Soil Erodibility on Northern Edge of Kubuqi Desert
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [34]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 明确机械沙障铺设对风沙区地表可蚀性特征的影响,为防沙工程中沙障的合理应用提供理论依据。[方法] 采取库布齐沙漠北缘迎风坡不同年限铺设的生物基可降解聚乳酸(PLA)沙袋沙障、沙柳沙障和芦苇沙障不同坡位的土壤样品,分析了地表0—20 cm深度土壤有机质含量、土壤粒径组成和土壤可蚀性K值。[结果] ①沙障铺设后利于土壤有机质含量增加,其中2 m×2 m沙柳沙障对土壤有机质的积累效果最好,且迎风坡上部土壤有机质含量相对较少。②沙障铺设使得障格内黏粒、粉粒和细砂含量增加,随设障年限的增加其呈增加趋势;土壤0—20 cm范围内均以细砂为主。③铺设机械沙障可降低土壤可蚀性,各立地条件下沙丘下部障格内土壤抗蚀性最好;3种机械沙障中沙柳沙障抗蚀性较高;随设障年限增加障格内土壤抗蚀性增强,设障4 a后,2 m×2 m铺设规格障格内的土壤受侵蚀风险较小;土壤可蚀性K值与土壤有机质含量呈极显著(p<0.01)负相关。[结论] 沙障铺设使土壤有机质含量增加,利于细粒物质的积累,增强土壤抗蚀性,是治理流动沙丘有效的风蚀防治措施。建议在库布齐沙漠北缘铺设机械沙障时,可采用迎风坡上部铺设1 m×1 m的生物基可降解聚乳酸(PLA)沙袋沙障,中部铺设2 m×2 m的沙柳沙障,下部铺设2 m×2 m的生物基可降解聚乳酸(PLA)沙袋沙障的模式。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The effects of mechanical sand barriers on surface erodibility in sandy areas which experience windy conditions were clarified in order to provide a theoretical basis for the application of a sand barrier in sand prevention engineering. [Methods] Soil samples taken from biodegradable polylactide (PLA) sandbag barriers, Salix psammophila sand barriers and reed sand barriers laid in different years on the windword slope of the northern margin of Kubuqi Desert were used to analyze soil organic matter content, soil particle size composition and soil erodibility K value at the 0—20 cm depth. [Results] ① The laying of sand barriers increased soil organic matter content. The 2 m×2 m S. psammophila sand barrier had the best effect on the accumulation of soil organic matter, and the soil organic matter content on the windward slope was relatively small. ② Laying of sand barriers increased the content of clay, silt, and fine sand in the barriers, and those contents increased with increased laying time. The soil in 0—20 cm layer was dominated by fine sand. ③ Laying of mechanical sand barriers could reduce soil erodibility, and the soil in the lower barriers of the dunes had the best erosion resistance under various site conditions. Among the three types of mechanical sand barriers, the S. psammophila sand barriers had the highest erosion resistance. Barrier effectiveness increased with laying time, and soil erosion resistance also increased. Four years after installation of sand barriers, the risk of soil erosion within the 2 m×2 m laying specification was relatively small. The soil erodibility K value and the soil organic matter content were negatively (p<0.01) correlated. [Conclusion] The laying of sand barriers increases the content of soil organic matter, and is conducive to the accumulation of fine-grained substances, thereby enhancing soil anti-erodibility. It is an effective wind erosion control measure for controlling mobile sand dunes. It is recommended that when laying mechanical sand barriers on the northern edge of the Kubuqi Desert, a 1 m×1 m PLA sandbag barrier should be laid on the upper part of the windward slope, a 2 m×2 m sallow sand barrier should be laid in the middle part, and a 2 m×2 m PLA sandbag barrier should be laid on the lower part of the windward slope.

    参考文献
    [1] Bewket W, Teferi E. Assessment of soil erosion hazard and prioritization for treatment at the watershed level:Case study in the Chemoga watershed, Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2010,20(6):609-622.
    [2] 林芳,朱兆龙,曾全超,等.延河流域3种土壤可蚀性K值估算方法比较[J].土壤学报,2017,54(5):1136-1146.
    [3] 南岭,杜灵通,展秀丽.土壤风蚀可蚀性研究进展[J].土壤,2014,46(2):204-211.
    [4] 董治宝,李振山.风成沙粒度特征对其风蚀可蚀性的影响[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998,12(4):3-5.
    [5] 董治宝,钱广强.关于土壤水分对风蚀起动风速影响研究的现状与问题[J].土壤学报,2007,44(5):934-942.
    [6] 李新荣,周海燕,王新平,等.中国干旱沙区的生态重建与恢复:沙坡头60年重要研究进展综述[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(2):247-264.
    [7] 高永,邱国玉,丁国栋,等.沙柳沙障的防风固沙效益研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(3):365-370.
    [8] 党晓宏,高永,虞毅,等.新型生物可降解PLA沙障与传统草方格沙障防风效益[J].北京林业大学学报,2015,37(3):118-125.
    [9] 李锦荣,孙保平,高永,等.基于空气动力学的沙袋沙障气流场模拟[J].北京理工大学学报,2010,30(6):749-752.
    [10] 党晓宏,虞毅,高永,等.PLA沙障对沙丘土壤粒径的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):16-19.
    [11] 石涛.光伏电站芦苇沙障防风固沙效益研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2020.
    [12] 王文彪,党晓宏,张吉树,等.库布齐沙漠北缘不同作物秸秆平铺式沙障的防风效能[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(1):65-71.
    [13] 张威.沙障在流动沙丘造林中的作用机制及效益研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018.
    [14] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
    [15] 汪邦稳.安徽省土壤可蚀性K值及其分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(6):132-139.
    [16] 葛佩琳,王凌云,莫明浩,等.鄱阳湖滨流动沙丘不同类型沙障土壤改良效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):87-91.
    [17] 刘铮瑶,董治宝,赵杰,等.人工固沙措施对沙丘沉积物特征及土壤养分的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(4):1383-1391.
    [18] 张天宇,尚晨晨,韩笑.东北地区坡耕地主要土种土壤可蚀性估算[J].土壤通报,2020,51(3):529-537.
    [19] 陈志超,李宁,刘昌华.古尔班通古特沙漠草方格沙障对土壤养分的影响[J].草业科学,2013,30(5):699-702.
    [20] 柴成武,王理德,尉秋实,等.民勤青土湖区不同年限退耕地土壤颗粒组成和养分变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(4):99-104.
    [21] 李晓佳,姜洪涛,周瑞平,等.腾格里沙漠东缘沙障布设方式对土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):50-58.
    [22] 丁文广,魏银丽,杨军梅,等.甘肃省中部干旱区植被恢复对土壤养分变化的影响研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(1):159-163.
    [23] 刘歌畅,王安宁,陈海鹏,等.冀北沙荒地不同坡位黄柳生物沙障对物种组成及多样性的影响[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(8):1700-1705.
    [24] 高雪松,邓良基,张世熔.不同利用方式与坡位土壤物理性质及养分特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):53-56.
    [25] 赵海霞,李波,刘颖慧,等.皇甫川流域不同尺度景观分异下的土壤性状[J].生态学报,2005,25(8):2010-2018.
    [26] 刘世梁,郭旭东,连纲,等.黄土高原土壤养分空间变异的多尺度分析:以横山县为例[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(5):107-110.
    [27] 王德,傅伯杰,陈利顶,等.不同土地利用类型下土壤粒径分形分析:以黄土丘陵沟壑区为例[J].生态学报,2007,27(7):3081-3089.
    [28] 黎小娟,周智彬,李宁,等.尼龙网方格沙障风沙流携沙粒度的空间分异特征[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(1):76-84.
    [29] 丁延龙,高永,汪季,等.生物基可降解聚乳酸(PLA)沙障对沙丘表层沉积物粒度特征的影响[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(2):262-269.
    [30] 许婷婷,董智,李红丽,等.不同设障年限沙丘土壤粒径和有机碳分布特征[J].环境科学研究,2014,27(6):628-634.
    [31] 周宁,李超,琚存勇,等.黑龙江省土壤可蚀性K值特征分析[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(10):182-189.
    [32] 陈志超,李宁,刘昌华.古尔班通古特沙漠草方格沙障对土壤养分的影响[J].草业科学,2013,30(5):699-702.
    [33] 赵富王,王宁,苏雪萌,等.黄土丘陵区主要植物根系对土壤有机质和团聚体的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):105-113.
    [34] 王艺钊,原伟杰,丁国栋,等.聚乳酸(PLA)沙障凹曲面及沉积物粒度特征研究[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(3):671-678.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

靳灵娜,党晓宏,高永,韩彦隆,雷虹娟,张超.库布齐沙漠北缘机械沙障对地表土壤可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(3):50-55

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-25
  • 最后修改日期:2021-01-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-07-08