沟道土地整治对不同植被覆盖流域CN值的影响
作者:
中图分类号:

P334.92

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目“黄土丘陵沟壑区边坡工程—沟道整治生态安全调控技术”(2017YFC0504703)


Effects of Gully Land Consolidation Project on CN in Catchments with Different Vegetation Coverage
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探究黄土丘陵沟壑区沟道土地整治后流域径流曲线数的变化规律,寻求合适的产流参数,为该区沟道土地整治工程安全和巩固生态建设成果提供科学支撑。[方法] 基于流域实体比尺模型分析不同植被覆盖条件下沟道土地整治对流域径流曲线数的影响。[结果] 同一植被覆盖度下,流域径流曲线数随着整治比例的增大而减小;与未整治流域相比,整治比例为20%时的流域径流曲线数减小了6.77;就分段整治比例而言,流域径流曲线数的减小速率随着整治比例的增大呈先增大后减小的趋势,整治比例由0.5%增大至5%时减小速率最大;不同植被覆盖度下,流域径流曲线数均随着整治比例的增大而减小,植被覆盖度为50%时沟道土地整治后流域径流曲线数的减小速率最大;植被覆盖度对沟道土地整治区域的径流曲线数影响显著,同一整治比例下,植被覆盖度每增大1%,沟道土地整治区域的径流曲线数减小0.22。[结论] 沟道土地整治可以改变流域下垫面,对径流曲线数影响显著。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The variation of runoff curve number after the gully land consolidation project (GLCP) was studied to explore the appropriate flow generation parameters, and to provide scientific support for the safety of GLCP and the consolidation of achievements in ecological construction. [Methods] Based on the physical scale model, the influence of GLCP on the runoff curve number under different vegetation cover conditions was investigated. [Results] Under the same vegetation coverage, the runoff curve number decreased with the increase of the land consolidation proportion. Compared with the unconsolidated basin, the runoff curve number decreased by 6.77 when the consolidation proportion was 20%. The decreasing rate of runoff curve number increased firstly and then decreased with the increase of land consolidation proportion, and the decrease rate reached the maximum when the consolidation proportion increased from 0.5% to 5%. Under different vegetation coverage, the runoff curve number decreased with the increase of consolidation proportion, and the decreasing rate of runoff curve number reached the maximum at the vegetation coverage of 50%. Vegetation coverage had great effects on the runoff curve number of the gully land consolidation area, and the runoff curve number decreased by 0.22 in the gully land consolidation area when the vegetation coverage increased by 1%. [Conclusion] The GLCP could change the hydrological characteristics of basin under layer and has significant effects on the runoff curve number.

    参考文献
    [1] 刘彦随, 李裕瑞.黄土丘陵沟壑区沟道土地整治工程原理与设计技术[J].农业工程学报, 2017, 33(10):1-9.
    [2] Liu Yansui, Guo Yanjun, Li Yurui. GIS-based effect assessment of soil erosion before and after gully land consolidation:A case study of Wangjiagou project region, Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(2):137-146.
    [3] Li Peiyue, Qian Hui, Wu Jianhua. Accelerate research on land creation[J]. Nature, 2014, 510(7503):29-31.
    [4] Liu Yansui, Li Yuhen. China's land creation project stands firm[J]. Nature:International Weekly Journal of Science, 2014, 511(7510):410-410.
    [5] 娄现勇, 高建恩, 韩赛奇, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区沟道土地整治工程对流域产汇流的影响[J].水电能源科学, 2016, 34(10):23-27.
    [6] 孙彭成, 高建恩, 韩赛奇, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区沟道土地整治对径流-泥沙-氮素排放影响的模拟研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(6):1177-1185.
    [7] 张鑫, 张青峰, 周阳阳, 等. 不同坡度黄土微地形条件下SCS-CN模型参数研究[J].水土保持研究, 2019, 26(2):74-77.
    [8] 王红艳, 张志强, 查同刚, 等. 径流曲线数(SCS-CN)模型估算黄土高原小流域场降雨径流的改进[J].北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(8):71-79.
    [9] 何杨洋, 王晓燕, 段淑怀.密云水库上游流域径流曲线模型的参数修订[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(6):134-138, 146
    [10] 王英, 黄明斌.径流曲线法模型参数在黄土地区的优化研究[J].水土保持通报, 2008, 28(1):54-58.
    [11] Liu Xianzhao, Li Jiazhu. Application of SCS model in estimation of runoff from small watershed in Loess Plateau of China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2008, 18(3):235-241.
    [12] Huang Mingbin, Gallichand J, Wang Zhanli, et al. A modification to the soil conservation service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2006, 20(3):579-589.
    [13] 罗利芳, 张科利, 符素华.径流曲线数法在黄土高原地表径流量计算中的应用[J].水土保持通报, 2002, 22(3):58-61, 68.
    [14] 王英, 黄明斌.径流曲线法在黄土区小流域地表径流预测中的初步应用[J].中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6(6):87-91, 97.
    [15] 邓景成, 高鹏, 穆兴民, 等. 模拟降雨条件下黄土区SCS模型的参数率定[J].水土保持研究, 2018, 25(5):205-210.
    [16] 高建恩, 吴普特, 牛文全, 等. 黄土高原小流域水力侵蚀模拟试验设计与验证[J].农业工程学报, 2005, 21(10):41-45.
    [17] 李琪, 马建斌, 刘洪吉.基于逐步回归的投影寻踪水文预报模型研究[J].水电能源科学, 2011, 29(2):10-12.
    [18] 陈虹, 李家科, 李亚娇, 等. 暴雨洪水管理模型SWMM的研究及应用进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(12):225-234.
    [19] 冯憬, 卫伟, 冯青郁.黄土丘陵区SCS-CN模型径流曲线数的计算与校正[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(10):4170-4181.
    [20] Katrien D, Jean P, Lorenzo B, et al. Runoff curve numbers for steep hillslopes with natural vegetation in semi-arid tropical highlands, Northern Ethiopia[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2008, 22(20):41-45.
    引证文献
    引证文献 [1]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李星瑶,张根广,高建恩,高哲,麻卉港,封博研,马林.沟道土地整治对不同植被覆盖流域CN值的影响[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(4):54-60

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:791
  • 下载次数: 876
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-19
  • 最后修改日期:2021-05-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-08-31