长江经济带水生态环境综合评价及区域差异
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F124, X826

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“深部煤矿多灾种安全评价方法与应用研究”(71971003);国家社科基金重大项目(20ZDA084);安徽省教育厅人文社科重点项目(SK2020A0209);安徽省社会科学创新发展研究攻关项目(2020CX174)。


Comprehensive Evaluation of Water Eco-environment and Regional Differences in Yangtze River Economic Belt
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 对长江经济带水生态环境状态进行评价,为该区域制定相应的生态保护政策提供科学依据。[方法] 以DCSM模型和质性分析结果为框架,选取包含“驱动力—承载源—承载状态—管理”4个子系统的22个水生态环境指标。利用随机森林降维,确定12个高相关指标作为综合评价体系,结合加权秩和比模型和对抗解释结构模型对长江经济带11个省份2010—2019年水生态环境定级,并依据优劣程度确定排名。[结果] ①就整体而言,长江经济带各区域水生态环境差异明显,呈现下游优,上游次之,中游较差的非对称“U”型特征分布。 ②就空间分布而言,浙江水生态状态排名靠前,江苏、云南、贵州、安徽、江西、四川、重庆、湖北水生态状态排名呈“阶梯状”递减,湖南、上海排名靠后。 ③就分类指标而言,工业废水重复利用率、万元农业生产总值耗水量、万元工业产业增加值废水排放量等对水生态环境具有显著影响。[结论] 长江经济带总体水生态环境仍未达到安全稳态,因地制宜从多方面提升水生态环境质量,是推动长江经济带高水平可持续发展的重要动力。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The state of the water ecological environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt was evaluated in order to provide a scientific basis for the formulation of ecological protection policies in the region. [Methods] Based on the DCSM model and qualitative analysis, 22 water ecological environment indicators were selected which included the four subsystems of driving force, carrying source, state, and management. By using random forest dimensionality reduction, 12 highly correlated indicators were identified as a comprehensive evaluation system. The water ecological environment of 11 provinces in the Yangtze River Economic Belt was ranked from 2010 to 2019 by combining the weighted rank sum ratio model and the adversarial interpretative structure model. The ranking was determined according to the degree of superiority and inferiority. [Results] ① In general, the water ecological environment of the Yangtze River Economic Belt differed significantly among regions, showing an asymmetric U-shaped distribution with the downstream region being superior, the upstream region being second, and the midstream region being worst. ② In terms of spatial distribution, the water ecological status of Zhejiang Province ranked first, while that of Jiangsu, Yunnan, Guizhou, Anhui, Jiangxi, Sichuan Province, Chongqing City, and Hubei Province decreased in a “steplike” descending manner, and that of Hunan Province and Shanghai City ranked low. ③ In terms of classification indexes, industrial wastewater reuse rate, water consumption of 10 000 yuan of agricultural GDP, and wastewater discharge of 10 000 yuan of industrial value added had significant impacts on the water ecological environment. [Conclusion] The overall water ecological environment of the Yangtze River Economic Belt has still not reached a safe and stable state. Improving the quality of the water ecological environment from various aspects according to local conditions is an important driving force for promoting high-level sustainable development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐悦,杨力,张驰,朱俊奇.长江经济带水生态环境综合评价及区域差异[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(1):253-262

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-07
  • 最后修改日期:2022-06-30
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-08
  • 出版日期: