南方红壤区自然灾害刚弹韧性社会评估——以福建省长汀县为例
作者:
中图分类号:

X43

基金项目:

福建省水利厅项目“乡村水环境与生态景观规划设计模式及评价指标研究”(KLh20015A)。


Assessment of Rigid-Elastic-Resilient Society Responses to Natural Disasters in Red Soil Area of South China—A Case Study at Changting County, Fujian Province
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [22]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探索建设更加强健、有效的自然灾害刚弹韧性社会途径,为南方红壤区防范化解重大自然灾害风险提供科学参考。[方法] 以南方红壤区典型受灾区福建省长汀县为例,从刚性抵御、弹性管控、韧性恢复3个维度构建了指标体系,利用熵权TOPSIS模型和耦合协调度模型定量评价了2006—2019年长汀县的自然灾害刚弹韧性社会综合水平及一级指标间的耦合协调性,并进行障碍度因子分析。[结果] ①长汀县的自然灾害刚弹韧性社会水平经历了由缓慢下降到显著增长的演化过程,在2006—2019年增长了0.461 6,总体呈现显著增长趋势。 ②长汀县自然灾害刚弹韧性社会的刚性抵御水平、弹性管控水平和韧性恢复水平总体呈现显著增长趋势,仅韧性恢复指数在2006—2010年呈明显下降趋势,由0.402 0下降至0.280 9。 ③在各项评价指标中,灾害监测能力、治安管理水平、第三产业比重、碳储存能力的下降以及水源涵养功能的减退是限制长汀县自然灾害刚弹韧性社会发展的关键因素。[结论] 从刚性抵御、弹性管控、韧性恢复3个维度对南方红壤区进行评估能较为有效、准确地反映该地区的自然灾害刚弹韧性社会综合水平。同时,应补齐发展短板,避免自然灾害刚性韧性社会出现衰退。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The method for building a society having robust and effective responses to natural disasters was determined in order to provide a scientific reference for preventing and reducing risks from major natural disasters in the red soil area of South China. [Methods] Changting County, Fujian Province was used as a typical disaster area in the red soil area of South China. An index system was constructed from three dimensions that included rigid resistance, elastic control, and resilient recovery. The entropy weight TOPSIS model and the coupling coordination model were used to quantitatively evaluate the comprehensive level and the coupling and coordination between the first level of rigid-elastic-resilient society responses to natural disasters in Changting County from 2006 to 2019. An obstacle factor analysis was conducted. [Results] ① The level of rigid-elastic-resilient society responses to natural disasters in Changting County evolved from a slow decline to a significant increase, with an increase of 0.4616 from 2006 to 2019, showing a significant growth trend overall. ② The rigid resistance level, elastic control level, and resilience recovery level of the rigid-elastic-resilient society responses to natural disasters in Changting County generally showed a significant growth trend. Only the resilience recovery index significantly decreased from 0.402 0 to 0.280 9 from 2006 to 2010. ③ Among various evaluation indicators, the decline of disaster monitoring capability, public security management level, proportion of tertiary industry, carbon storage capability, and water conservation function were the key factors restricting the development of the rigid-elastic-resilience society responses to natural disasters in Changting County. [Conclusion] The red soil area of South China was evaluated from three dimensions including rigid resistance, elastic control, and resilient recovery. These three dimensions effectively and accurately reflected the comprehensive level of rigid, elastic, and resilient society responses to natural disasters in the region. At the same time, the weak links in development should be strengthened to avoid the decline of rigid-elastic-resilient society responses to natural disasters.

    参考文献
    [1] 聂小飞,郑海金,涂安国,等.南方红壤区长期水土流失综合治理显著减少河流输沙:以鄱阳湖流域赣江上游平江为例[J].湖泊科学,2021,33(3):935-946.
    [2] 分区考察组.分区考察成果及防治对策(分区五):南方红壤区[J].中国水利,2009(7):35-39.
    [3] 熊平生,谢世友.中国全球变化研究优势领域及进展[J].地理与地理信息科学,2008,24(3):86-89.
    [4] Meerow S, Newell J P, Stults M. Defining urban resilience: A review [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016,147:38-49.
    [5] 刘燕华,葛全胜,张雪芹.关于中国全球环境变化人文因素研究发展方向的思考[J].地球科学进展,2004,19(6):889-895.
    [6] Siebeneck L, Arlikatti S, Andrew S A. Using provincial baseline indicators to model geographic variations of disaster resilience in Thailand [J]. Natural Hazards, 2015,79(2):955-975.
    [7] Zhai Guofang, Li Shasha, Chen Jing. Reducing urban disaster risk by improving resilience in China from a planning perspective [J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2015,21(5):1206-1217.
    [8] 吴绍洪,高江波,韦炳干,等.自然灾害韧弹性社会的理论范式[J].地理学报,2021,76(5):1136-1147.
    [9] 郭小东,费智涛,王志涛.城市灾害应对的刚性、弹性与韧性[J].城乡规划,2021(3):35-42.
    [10] 王培俊,刘旗,孙煌,等.南方红壤水土流失区生态系统服务价值时空变化研究[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(5):219-228.
    [11] 陈国光,刘红樱,陈进全,等.福建长汀县水土流失的地质影响因素及防治对策[J].水文地质工程地质,2020,47(6):26-35.
    [12] 常言.既要金山银山更要绿水青山:长汀县持续推进水土流失治理与生态文明建设[J].福建党史月刊,2020(2):14-18.
    [13] 刘明霞,刘友存,陈明,等.2000—2018年赣江上游植被覆盖度时空演化及其对气候变化的响应[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(5):284-290.
    [14] 杨君,周鹏全,袁淑君,等.基于InVEST模型的洞庭湖生态经济区生态系统服务功能研究[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(1):267-272.
    [15] 杨帆,陈梓萌,巩世彬.基于AHP-熵权TOPSIS模型的辽宁省各城市土地承载力评价[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(1):144-149.
    [16] 刘志有,曲秀武,魏冉,等.生态文明视角下的伊犁河谷绿洲土地生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(1):137-143.
    [17] 张志琛,林樱子,彭翀.长江经济带城市群社会韧性评估与提升策略[C]//面向高质量发展的空间治理:2020中国城市规划年会论文集(01城市安全与防灾规划). 2021:393-402.
    [18] 柳梦琪,曾忠平.基于熵权TOPSIS法的武汉市土地利用多功能性评价[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(2):314-321.
    [19] 张庆霞.城市洪涝灾害治理的社会韧性研究[D].甘肃兰州:兰州大学,2021.
    [20] 何敏.基于多灾种重大灾害风险视角的城市韧性评估研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2021.
    [21] 温家洪,颜建平,王慧敏,等.韧弹性视角下的城市综合巨灾风险管理[J].城市问题,2019(10):76-82.
    [22] 贺一雄,赵咏梅,赵翠薇.乌蒙山区洪涝灾害风险评估: 以贵州省毕节市为例[J].贵州科学,2021,39(4):53-60.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

胡康,岳辉,梁裕宁,吴丽君,朱萱,钟子豪,丁国昌.南方红壤区自然灾害刚弹韧性社会评估——以福建省长汀县为例[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(1):272-280

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-23
  • 最后修改日期:2022-07-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-08