福建省2011—2020年乡村振兴战略推进绩效综合评估
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X32

基金项目:

福建省习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心重大项目“福建乡村振兴绩效水平评估研究”(FJ2021XZZ011)


Comprehensive Evaluation of Rural Revitalization Performance in Fujian Province During 2011—2020
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 从产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效、生活富裕等5个维度构建乡村振兴绩效评估指标体系,为乡村振兴绩效评估提供科学参考。 [方法] 引入全排列多边形图示指标模型,对福建省2011—2020年的乡村振兴战略推进绩效水平进行综合评估。 [结果] 福建省“十二五”期间的产业兴旺指数总体优于“十三五”期间(p<0.05),与之相反,“十二五”期间的乡风文明指数总体小于“十三五”期间(p>0.05)。“十三五”期间的生态宜居、治理有效、生活富裕等指数均处于较高水平,其绩效水平均优于“十二五”期间(p<0.01)。2011—2020年福建省乡村振兴绩效综合评估指数分别为0.001~1.458,总体上呈“上升—下降—上升”的N形变化趋势。2011—2015年的乡村振兴绩效综合评估指数总体小于2016—2020年(p<0.05)。 [结论] 研究期内,福建省乡村振兴推进绩效水平优劣顺序为:2020,2019,2018,2015,2016,2017,2014,2013,2012,2011年。2018—2020年福建省乡村振兴绩效综合评估指数相对较高。在乡村振兴战略推动过程中,应结合各个地市实际情况,细化绩效考核评价指标体系,构建乡村振兴绩效考核制度。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The rural revitalization performance evaluation index system was constructed based on five dimensions: thriving businesses, pleasant living environments, social etiquette and civility, effective governance, and prosperity, in order to provide references for comprehensive evaluation of rural revitalization performance. [Methods] Rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province was evaluated by applying the entire-array-polygon synthesis illustration model from 2011—2020. [Results] The thriving businesses index for the 12th Five-Year Plan period was better than that of the 13th Five-Year Plan period (p<0.05). In contrast, the social etiquette and civility index for the 12th Five-Year Plan period was lower than that of the 13th Five-Year Plan period (p>0.05). Performance indexes for pleasant living environments, effective governance, and prosperity for the 13th Five-Year Plan period were at a high level, and the performance level was better than that of the 12th Five-Year Plan period (p<0.01). From 2011 to 2020, the comprehensive evaluation index of rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province ranged from 0.001 to 1.458, showing an N-shaped trend of up-down-up. The performance level from 2011 to 2015 was lower than the level observed from 2016 to 2020 (p<0.05). [Conclusion] Rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province during the study period decreased following the year order of 2020 > 2019 > 2018 > 2015 > 2016 > 2017 < 2014 > 2013 > 2012 > 2011. Rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province was relatively higher from 2018 to 2020. In the process of promoting rural revitalization strategy, people should refine the performance evaluation index system and construct a rural revitalization performance evaluation system based on the actual situation of each city.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

饶清华,游武,赵天予,林秀珠,陈芳,邱雪芬,陈文花,林云杉.福建省2011—2020年乡村振兴战略推进绩效综合评估[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(2):381-388

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-29
  • 最后修改日期:2022-11-15
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-06-01
  • 出版日期: