2030年中国省域间碳排放配额分配研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

郑州大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(批准号2015ZX07204- 002-05)


Carbon Emission Quota Allocation Among Provinces in China in 2030
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 在碳排放总量控制下,对省域间碳排放配额进行公平科学的分配是实现“双碳”目标的关键途径,也是碳排放交易机制体系的重要基石。分析不同情景下碳排放配额分配结果的碳减排边际成本,以期以最小成本确定最优的碳排放配额分配方案,为区域后期开展分配工作提供理论基础,为地区碳减排方案制定提供工作参考。[方法] 在前人建立的碳配额分配指标基础上引入生态性指标,并设置公平、效率、生态、兼顾公平—生态—效率4种情景,利用SBM对偶模型测算不同情景下区域碳边际减排成本,并以此为依据确定最优分配方案。[结果] 在公平、效率、生态、兼顾情景下平均碳边际减排成本分别为0.295万元/t,0.312万元/t,0.291万元/t,0.309万元/t,引入生态性指标的方案减排成本明显更低,可推断出是碳汇抵消掉部分减排难度较大、成本较高的碳排放所致;兼顾情景下减排成本明显高于公平、生态情景,表明碳排放效率的提升同会导致碳边际减排成本增加。[结论] 生态情景下的碳排放配额是以最低碳边际减排成本实现“双碳”目标的最优方案,可以作为地区碳排放方案制定的参考。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Under total carbon emission control, a fair and scientific allocation of carbon emission quota among provinces is a key approach to achieve the goal of "double carbon", as well as an important cornerstone of the carbon emission trading system. The marginal cost of carbon emission reduction in the results of carbon emission quota allocation under different scenarios was analyzed, with a view to determining the optimal carbon emission quota allocation scheme at the lowest cost, providing a theoretical basis for the subsequent regional allocation work and a reference for the formulation of regional carbon emission reduction schemes. [Methods] The ecological index was introduced on the basis of the carbon quota allocation index established by predecessors, and four scenarios including equity, efficiency, ecology and equity-eco-efficiency were set. The SBM dual model was used to calculate the regional marginal carbon emission reduction cost under different scenarios, and the optimal allocation scheme was determined based on this. [Results]The results show that: Under the scenarios of fairness, efficiency, ecology and consideration, the average marginal cost of carbon emission reduction was 0.295 million yuan/t, 0.312 million yuan/t, 0.291 million yuan/t, and 0.309 million yuan/t, respectively. The emission reduction cost of the scheme introducing ecological index is significantly lower, and it can be inferred that the carbon sink offsets part of the carbon emissions which are difficult and costly to reduce emissions. The cost of emission reduction under the balanced scenario is significantly higher than that under the fair and ecological scenarios, indicating that the improvement of carbon emission efficiency will lead to the increase of marginal carbon emission reduction cost. [Conclusion] The carbon emission quota under ecological scenario is the best scheme to achieve the "double carbon" goal with the lowest marginal carbon emission reduction cost, and can be used as a reference for the formulation of regional carbon emission plans.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-30
  • 最后修改日期:2023-06-16
  • 录用日期:2023-06-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-09
  • 出版日期: