福建省碳储量时空特征及其对土地利用变化的响应
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X87, F124.5

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“南方丘陵红壤侵蚀退化地马尾松种群动态及其对生境变化的响应”(31971638); 广东省科技创新战略专项资金攀登计划项目(pdjh2020b0169); 江西省高校人文社会科学研究规划项目(GL20116); 江西省教育厅科技项目(GJJ201419)


Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Carbon Storage and Its Response to Land Use Changes in Fujian Province
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 研究福建省生态系统碳储量及其对土地利用变化的响应,为生态系统保护提供参考。[方法] 基于土地利用数据和碳密度数据,运用InVEST模型模拟福建省1980,2000,2020年碳储量;利用冷热点分布、转移图谱和矩阵分析碳储量和土地利用的时空特征;最后分析碳储量对土地利用变化的响应。[结果] ①福建省碳储量整体均较高,82.5%以上区域的碳储量为中等以上(>3 000 t),主要分布在山地丘陵地区,也是高碳储量的热点集中区;高(热点)低(冷点)碳储量集中区转移较少;1980—2020年总碳储量波动略升高,2000—2020年不同碳储量等级彼此之间转移相对较多。②福建省土地利用/覆被以林地为主(61.4%~62.9%),其次是耕地(16.9%~18.3%)和草地(15.2%~17.2%);土地利用/覆被变化在1980—2000年较稳定,在2000—2020年较剧烈。③林地、草地和耕地的总碳储量较高,水域、建设用地和未利用地总碳储量较少;耕地总碳储量减少,建设用地总碳储量增加,林地和草地有增加也有减少;由土地利用/覆被变化导致的总碳储量转出和转入最多均为林地,其次是草地和耕地;总碳储量净转移为负的是林地,其他为正,林地转移引起的碳亏损最多。[结论] 耕地、林地和草地是福建省的主要土地利用类型,它们贡献了较高碳储量,并相互转移引起了碳储量变化。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The ecosystem carbon storage and its response to land use changes in Fujian Province were analysed in order to provide a reference for ecosystem protection. [Methods] Based on land use data and carbon density data, the InVEST model was used to simulate carbon storage in Fujian Province in 1980, 2000, and 2020. The spatiotemporal characteristics of carbon storage and land use were analyzed using the distribution of cold spots and hot spots, transfer maps, and a transfer matrix. The response of carbon storage to land use changes was analyzed. [Results] ① Carbon storage in Fujian Province was relatively high on the whole, and more than 82.5% of the region was above medium carbon storage (>3 000 t), mainly located in mountainous and hilly areas, which were also hot spots of high carbon storage. Ares of high (hot spots) and low (cold spots) of carbon storage concentration transferred less. Total carbon storage fluctuated slightly from 1980 to 2020, and relatively more carbon storage transferred between different carbon storage levels from 2000 to 2020. ② Land use/cover in Fujian Province was mainly forest land (61.4%—62.9%), followed by cultivated land (16.9%—18.3%) and grassland (15.2%—17.2%). Land use/cover change was relatively stable from 1980 to 2000, and more intense from 2000 to 2020. ③ Total carbon storage values in forest land, grassland, and cultivated land were relatively high, while total carbon storage in water bodies, construction land, and unused land were relatively low. Total carbon storage in cultivated land decreased over time, while total carbon storage of construction land increased. The area of forest land and grassland both increased and decreased. The largest transfer of total carbon storage caused by land use/cover changes was observed in forest land, followed by grassland and cultivated land. The net transfer of total carbon storage was negative for forest land, and positive for the other land use classes. The largest carbon loss was observed for the transfer of forest land. [Conclusion] Cultivated land, forest land, and grassland were the main types of land use in Fujian Province contributing to higher carbon storage, and their mutual transfer resulted in carbon storage changes.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

司晓茜,王小军,林莹冰,刘光旭.福建省碳储量时空特征及其对土地利用变化的响应[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(5):355-364,394

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-02
  • 最后修改日期:2023-05-16
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-30
  • 出版日期: