辽宁省“三生”功能时空演变及其碳排放效应研究
作者:
作者单位:

教育部人文社科重点研究基地

基金项目:

辽宁省教育厅青年项目(LQ2020030);辽宁省社会科学规划基金青年项目(L20CJY004)


Spatial-temporal evolution of Production-living-Ecological function and its carbon emission effect: a case study of Liaoning Province
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [38]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探究辽宁省“三生”功能时空演变及其碳排放效应,为“双碳”目标下的国土空间规划提供依据。[方法] 基于土地利用多功能性分类识别辽宁省国土“三生”功能、结合直接和间接排放因子法核算碳排放量,探索“三生”功能与碳排放量空间关系及其时空分异性,揭示“三生”功能时空演变的碳排放效应。[结果] ① 2005-2020年辽宁省“三生”功能空间分布格局总体变化不大,大部分地区以生产和生态功能为主,生活功能区扩张明显,各地级市中心与周边区域空间差异明显;② 2005-2013年,辽宁省各县域碳排放量增长迅速,2013-2020年增速缓慢,但空间差异愈发显著,碳排放高值明显集中在沈阳市和大连市;③ 辽宁省“三生”功能与碳排放量空间布局及数量变化的相关性总体较强,但空间差异明显且影响因素复杂。[结论]辽宁省各县域需要在自然地理条件约束和经济社会发展需求引导下,在明确各自土地主导功能定位的基础上,依托自身区域优势与资源禀赋,加强区域协作,以实现全域碳减排。 关键词:“三生”功能;碳排放;地理加权回归;辽宁省 中图分类号:P9

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective]Research on carbon emission effect of“Production-living-Ecological” function change can provide reference for territorial and spatial planning under the background of “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals”.[Methods]The research applied the methods including evaluation assignment method, energy consumption method and geographical weighted regression model to reveal the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of the "production-living-ecology" functions and its effect the carbon emission in Liaoning Province from 2005 to 2020. [Results]① the spatial distribution pattern of the "production-living-ecology" functions in Liaoning Province had not changed much from 2005 to 2020. Most of the areas were dominated by production and ecological functions, the living function areas were obviously expanded, and the spatial difference mainly occurs between the central urban and the surrounding areas; ② From 2005 to 2013, the carbon emissions of counties in Liaoning Province increased rapidly, and from 2013 to 2020, the growth rate was slower but its spatial difference became more obvious. The high carbon emissions were significantly concentrated in Shenyang and Dalian cities;③ At the aspects of spatial pattern and quantitive change, the overall correlation between the "production-living-ecology" function and carbon emission is strong, meanwhile, the spatial differences were obvious and its influenced factors were complex. [Conclusion] Under the constraints of natural conditions and guided by their social and economic development needs, counties in Liaoning province need to clarify the main functions of the land and promote the regional cooperation on the basis of their own advantages and resource endowment, in order to realize of carbon emission reduction of the whole region.

    参考文献
    [1] Lingfeng Deng. Current Situation and Reflections of Environmental Accounting Information Disclosure in China''s Iron and Steel Industry under the Background of "Double Carbon“[J]. Pacific International Journal,2022,5(4).
    [2] Zeng Qing-Hua,He Ling-Yun. Study on the synergistic effect of air pollution prevention and carbon emission reduction in the context of "dual carbon": Evidence from China''s transport sector[J]. Energy Policy,2023,173.
    [3] Zhou Zhijie,Liu Yunlong,Du Jianjian. Analysis on the constraint mechanism of transportation carbon emissions in the Pearl River Delta based on ‘Dual carbon’ goals[J]. Systems Science Control Engineering,2022,10(1).
    [4] Guo Qingran,Wu Zhuo,Jahanger Atif, et al. The spatial impact of digital economy on energy intensity in China in the context of double carbon to achieve the sustainable development goals.[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international,2022.
    [5] Du Wenxing,Wang Yuxia,Qian Dingyi, et al. Process and Eco-Environment Impact of Land Use Function Transition under the Perspective of “Production-Living-Ecological” Spaces—Case of Haikou City, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022,19(24).
    [6] Liu Changchang,Deng Chuxiong,Li Zhongwu, et al. Response Characteristics of Soil Erosion to Spatial Conflict in the Production-Living-Ecological Space and Their DrivingMechanism: A Case Study of Dongting Lake Basin in China[J]. Land,2022,11(10).
    [7] 梅思雨,李本智,易海军, 等.快速城市化区域的三生空间冲突时空演化特征分析——以浙江省镇海区为例[J].上海国土资源,2022,43(03):55-60+98.
    [8] Wang Yufeng. Spatial-temporal evolution of "Production-Living-Ecologica China.[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international,2022.
    [9] Cui Xinghua,Xu Ning,Chen Wanxu,Wang Guanzheng, et al. Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022,19(16).
    [10] Xiao Pengnan,Xu Jie,Zhao Chong. Conflict Identification and Zoning Optimization of “Production-Living-Ecological” Space[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022,19(13).
    [11] Zhang Zuo,Li Jiaming. Spatial suitability and multi-scenarios for land use: Simulation and policy insights from the production-living-ecological perspective[J]. Land Use Policy,2022,119.
    [12] 李新安,李慧.面向双碳目标的中国经济发展质量提升研究[J].河南科技学院学报,2022,42(05):1-11.
    [13] 陈茜,武联,党雨田.传统人居环境营建中 三生 空间的内在机制与启示[J].城市发展研究,2022,29(03):6-11.
    [14] 康庆,郭青霞,丁一等.山西省2005-2018年“三生”功能的时空分异特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(05):327-337.DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.042.
    [15] 吴欣玥.全域土地综合整治背景下的乡村“三生空间”治理路径——以山水乡旅乡村振兴示范走廊为例[J].四川环境,2022,41(01):200-208.DOI:10.4034/j.cnki.schj.2022.01.030.
    [16] 刘峰,郭林峰,赵路正.双碳背景下煤炭安全区间与绿色低碳技术路径[J].煤炭学报,2022,47(01):1-15.DOI:10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg22.0016.
    [17] 冀正欣,许月卿,黄安,卢龙辉, 等.冀北山区“三生”空间识别与演化特征分析——以张家口市为例[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2022,58(01):123-134.DOI:10.13209/j.0479-8023.2021.21.
    [18] 庄贵阳,周宏春,郭萍,等."双碳“目标与区域经济发展[J].区域经济评论,2022(01):16-27.DOI:10.14017/j.cnki.2095-5766.2022.0003.
    [19] 李繁荣.中国乡村振兴与乡村功能优化转型[J].地理科学,2021,41(12):2158-2167.DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.12.009.
    [20] 梁晨,李建平,李俊杰.基于 三生 功能的我国农村人居环境质量与经济发展协调度评价与优化[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(10):19-30.
    [21] 黄韧.“双碳”目标下北京市能源转型重点领域及路径研究[D].华北电力大学(北京),2021.DOI:10.27140/d.cnki.ghbbu.2021.001513.
    [22] 李媛洁,叶长盛,黄小兰.基于CLUE-S模型的南昌市“三生”空间时空演变及情景模拟研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):325-332.DOI:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2021.05.037.
    [23] 熊健,卢柯,姜紫莹,等."碳达峰、碳中和“目标下国土空间规划编制研究与思考[J].城市规划学刊,2021(04):74-80.DOI:10.16361/j.upf.202104011.
    [24] 张永蕾,栾乔林,熊昌盛, 等.基于多源空间数据的 三生 空间异质性评价与分区划定[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(10):214-223+317.
    [25] 江东,林刚,付晶莹."三生空间 统筹的科学基础与优化途径探析[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(05):1085-1101.
    [26] 孔冬艳,陈会广,吴孔森.中国 三生空间 演变特征、生态环境效应及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(05):1116-1135.
    [27] 康庆,郭青霞,丁一,等.山西省 三生 功能协同/权衡关系分析[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(05):1195-1207.
    [28] 焦庚英,杨效忠,黄志强,等.县域 三生空间 格局与功能演变特征及可能影响因素分析——以江西婺源县为例[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(05):1252-1267.
    [29] 张琴琴,瓦哈甫.哈力克,麦尔哈巴.麦提尼亚孜,等.基于SD模型的吐鲁番市生态-生产-生活承载力分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(04):54-60.DOI:10.3448/j.cnki.jalre.2017.110.
    [30] 赵瑞,刘学敏.京津冀都市圈 三生 空间时空格局演变及其驱动力研究[J].生态经济,2021,37(04):201-208.
    [31] 涂玮,刘钦普.长江经济带旅游碳排放与旅游碳承载力关系研究[J].生态科学,2023,42(02):219-227.DOI:10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2023.02.026.
    [32] 陈炜,殷田园,李红兵.1997-2015年中国种植业碳排放时空特征及与农业发展的关系[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(02):37-44.DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2019.39.
    [33] 刘健强,马晓钰.人口老龄化、产业结构升级与碳排放——基于STIRPAT模型的空间计量分析[J].金融与经济,2021(07):54-62.DOI:10.19622/j.cnki.cn36-1005/f.2021.07.07.
    [34] 胡振,龚薛,刘华.基于BP模型的西部城市家庭消费碳排放预测研究——以西安市为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(07):82-89.DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.187.
    [35] 王长建,汪菲,张虹鸥.新疆能源消费碳排放过程及其影响因素——基于扩展的Kaya恒等式[J].生态学报,2016,36(08):2151-2163.
    [36] 王瑛,何艳芬.西部地区中心城市碳排放与经济发展关系研究——以西安市为例[J].生态科学,2019,38(04):217-224.DOI:10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2019.4.029.
    [37] 刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞.中国 三生空间 分类评价与时空格局分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(07):1290-1304.
    [38] 张红旗,许尔琪,朱会义.中国“三生用地”分类及其空间格局[J].资源科学,2015,37(07):1332-1338.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:187
  • 下载次数: 457
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-12
  • 最后修改日期:2023-08-07
  • 录用日期:2023-08-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-06-28