长汀县罗地河小流域综合治理水土保持碳汇能力监测评价
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.水利部水土保持监测中心;2.福建师范大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金重点项目“亚热带森林恢复过程中植物来源的底物质量对稳定性土壤有机质的影响机制”(32030073);水利部重大科技项目“南方红壤区典型侵蚀退化地不同治理措施碳汇效应与计量技术研究与示范”(SKS-2022083);福建省水利科技项目“南方红壤侵蚀区水土保持项目碳汇核算研究”(MSK202311)


Monitoring and evaluation on carbon sink capacity of comprehensive management of soil and water conservation in Luodihe watershed of Changting county
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]准确、有效地监测和核算综合治理水土保持碳汇成效,对建构水土保持碳汇能力评价指标体系与核算方法具有支撑作用。[方法]采用实地采样分析、激光雷达采集相关参数,核算罗地河小流域植被碳库和土壤碳库的储碳量,评价小流域综合治理的碳汇能力。[结果]20年综合治理后,各类水土保持措施碳汇作用和能力显著提升,小流域碳储量增加3.97×104 t,年均增长1.80×103 t/a,土壤和植被的碳储量分别增加73.73%和346.41%。小流域碳汇量达到3.05×104 t,其中土壤碳汇1.66×104 t、植被碳汇1.39×104 t。各种措施提升碳汇增量的能力存在差异,板栗林地和施肥马尾松林地增汇明显。[结论]各类水土保持措施保碳、固碳和增汇作用显著,整地、造林、配以施肥养育的林地碳汇能力更加显著,是提升保土持水效益、增加碳汇增量的有效手段。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:[Objective] Accurately and effectively monitor the effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures and their carbon sinks, and provide important support for the construction of carbon sink capacity evaluation index system and accounting methods under the dual carbon policy. [Methods] The carbon storage capacity of the vegetation carbon pool and soil carbon pool in the Luodihe small watershed was calculated through field sampling analysis and LiDAR collection of relevant parameters. The study evaluated the carbon sink capacity of comprehensive management of the small watershed. [Results] ①After 21 years of comprehensive management, the carbon sink role and capacity of all kinds of soil and water conservation measures were significantly improved, and the carbon storage of the small watershed increased by 3.97×104 t, with an average annual increase of 1.89×103 t/a, ②From the perspective of carbon pool, the carbon storage of soil and vegetation increased by 73.73% and 346.41% respectively during 2001~2022. The carbon sink of small watershed reached 3.05×104 t, including 1.66×104 t of soil carbon sink and 1.39×104 t of vegetation carbon sink.③There were differences in the ability of various measures to increase the increase of carbon sinks, among which chestnut forest land and fertilized Pinus massoniana forest land increased sink the most obviously, followed by coniferous and broad mixed forest, nursery and protection of Pinus massoniana, horizontal step land preparation of Pinus massoniana forest, and finally closed treatment and bayberry forest land. [Conclusion]The carbon sink capacity of various water and soil conservation measures in carbon retention, carbon sequestration and sink increase is obvious, while the carbon sink capacity of forest land such as chestnut forest and fertilized Pinus massoniana forest land with land preparation, afforestation, and fertilization and breeding measures is more significant, which is an effective means to improve the efficiency of soil and water retention and increase carbon sink.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-18
  • 最后修改日期:2023-08-11
  • 录用日期:2023-08-16
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-09
  • 出版日期: