“23.7”京津冀暴雨洪水特性分析 —以河北省临城县为例
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室;2.水利部 水土保持监测中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金黄河水科学联合基金“黄土高原极端暴雨土壤侵蚀致灾及蓄排协调防控机制”(U2243213),国家重点研发计划黄河中游多沙粗沙区风水复合侵蚀协同治理技术与示范“黄土高原风水复合侵蚀生态治理技术识别挖掘和配置模式研究”(2022YFF130080402),“多沙粗沙区水土流失生态治理技术全生命周期抑沙阻沙效益分析”(2022YFF130080403)


Analysis of rainstorm flood characteristics in “23.7” Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei: A case study of Lincheng County, Hebei Province
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]为探究小流域的暴雨洪水过程以及暴雨所造成的土壤侵蚀情况,亟需开展场次暴雨洪水过程以及水土保持调查工作,为下一步水土保持决策提供科学支撑。[方法]采用野外调查的方法对皇迷东沟和梁家庄西沟开展洪痕测量调查并计算洪峰流量模数,分析暴雨洪水对小流域造成的侵蚀危害。[结果]①本次降雨持续时间长、雨强大,梁家庄西沟和皇迷东沟流域累计雨量分别达到1008.5mm和613.6mm。②调查按洪痕法调查推算了洪峰流量,皇迷东沟、梁家庄西沟小流域洪峰流量模数为10.80m3/s·km2、36.07m3/s·km2。坡度和水土保持措施是影响洪峰流量的主要因素,较大的坡度会使洪峰流量变大,而完善的水土保持措施可以起到有效的削峰作用。③调查小流域位于泜河流域上游,是本次暴雨中心和洪水的主要产流区,小流域洪峰流量模数大于下游水文站洪峰流量模数。④梁家庄西沟的侵蚀情况比皇迷东沟严重,主要原因是皇迷东沟的果园、梯田和谷坊的面积占比大于梁家庄西沟,皇迷东沟的平均坡度小于梁家庄西沟且梁家庄雨量站的降雨量峰值持续时间更长。[结论] 实施水土保持措施是必要且有效的,而且要进一步完善梯田、台地谷坊的建设,良好的水土保持措施可以有效减少洪峰流量以及侵蚀现象的发生。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] In order to investigate the rainstorms and floods process and the soil erosion caused by rainstorms in small watershed, it is urgent to carry out the investigation of rainstorms and floods process and soil and water conservation, so as to provide scientific support for the next soil and water conservation decision. [Methods] The flood marks were measured and investigated in Huangmi East Ditch and Liangjiazhuang West Ditch by field investigation method, and the flood peak discharge modulus was calculated to analyze the erosion damage caused by rainstorm flood to small watershed. [Results]① The rainfall lasted for a long time and was strong. The cumulative rainfall in Liangjiazhuang West Ditch Valley and Huangmi East Ditch Valley reached 1008.5mm and 613.6mm, respectively. According to the flood mark survey, the peak discharge modulus of Huangmi East Ditch and Liangjiazhuang West Ditch watershed are 10.80m3/s·km2 and 36.07m3/s·km2 respectively. Slope and soil and water conservation measures are the main factors affecting flood peak discharge. Larger slope will increase flood peak discharge, and perfect soil and water conservation measures can play an effective role in peak reduction. (3) The investigated small watershed is located in the upper reaches of 泜 river basin, which is the main runoff producing area of the rainstorm center and flood. The peak flood discharge modulus of the small watershed is larger than that of the downstream hydrology station. (4) The erosion situation of Liangjiazhuang West Ditch is more serious than that of Huangmi East Ditch, mainly because the area proportion of orchards, terraces and check dam in Huangmi East Ditch is larger than that of Huangmi West Ditch, the average slope of Huangmi East Ditch is smaller than that of Liangjiazhuang West Ditch, and the peak duration of rainfall at Liangjiazhuang rain measuring station is longer. [Conclusion] It is necessary and effective to implement soil and water conservation measures, and to further improve the construction of terrace and terrace valley. Good soil and water conservation measures can effectively reduce the occurrence of flood peak discharge and erosion phenomenon.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-20
  • 最后修改日期:2024-02-21
  • 录用日期:2024-02-26
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: