+高级检索
首页 > 过刊浏览>2024年第44卷第1期 >40-49,85. DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.01.005
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
九寨沟黏性土含量对改良碎石土水分特性的影响
作者:
中图分类号:

S152.3

基金项目:

九寨沟风景名胜区管理局采购项目“九沟湖泊沼泽化及河道生态恢复研究项目”(N5132112022000246)；四川省自然科学基金(2023NSFSC0378)


Effect of Cohesive Soil Content on Water Properties of Improved Gravel Soil in Jiuzhai Valley
Author:
  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [29]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 分析九寨沟2017年"8·8"地震后崩坡积碎石土和当地沉积黏性土不同比例混合体的土壤水分特性,选出适宜研究区植物生长的最佳改良碎石土,为九寨沟地区灾后生态环境修复提供科学依据。[方法] 将九寨沟当地黏性土与九寨沟地区碎石土以不同体积比进行混合,通过土水特征曲线试验、水分常数试验、土柱试验来探究不同比例下土壤水分特性,挑选适宜于植物生长的混合土比例。[结果] ①van Genuchten模型能够很好地拟合改良碎石土的土水特征曲线,土壤进气值随着黏性土比例的增加而增加,参数α在一定程度上能够表征进气值的状态。②改良后的碎石土使吸湿系数、凋萎系数、田间持水量、饱和含水量等都随着黏性土比例的增加而增加。相较于碎石土,添加黏性土的改良碎石土可用水量增大22.26 %~50.00 %,最大有效水量增大70.96 %~131.46 %,更加有利于植物生长。③3种模型对比下,Philip模型对土壤水分入渗模拟效果最好,吸渗率S大小能够在一定程度上代表初始入渗速率的变化趋势。[结论] 综合对比不同比例改良碎石土水分特性可见,当下覆土层为储水层,可选择碎石土与黏性土比例为7:3作为改良碎石土最佳配比;当下覆土层为非储水层,无法储存水分时,可选择碎石土与黏性土比例为3:7作为改良碎石土最佳配比。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The soil water characteristics of the mixture of landslide gravel soil and local sedimentary cohesive soil in different proportions in Jiuzhai Valley after the "8·8" earthquake in 2017, were analyzed, and the best improved gravel soil suitable for plant growth in the study area was selected in order to provide scientific basis for ecological environment restoration after earthquake in Jiuzhai Valley region.[Methods] A local clay soil from Jiuzhai Valley and gravel soil from the Jiuzhai Valley region were mixed at different volume ratios, and soil water characteristics were investigated by soil water characteristic curve test, water constant test, and soil column test to investigate the soil water characteristics under the different mixing ratios in order to select soil mixing ratios suitable for plant growth.[Results] ① The van Genuchten model was able to fit the soil-water characteristic curve of the improved gravel soil well, and the soil air-entry value increased as the proportion of clay soil increased. The parameter α characterized the state of the air-entry value to a certain extent. ② The improved gravel soil increased the water absorption coefficient, wilting coefficient, field water-holding capacity and saturated water content as the proportion of clay soil increased. The water availability and maximum effective water volume of the gravel soil increased by 22.26 %~50.00 % with the addition of clay soil (compared with the gravel soil), and the maximum effective water volume similarly increased by 70.96 %~131.46 %. ③ Of the three models evaluated, the Philip model simulated soil water infiltration the best, and the size of the uptake rate (S) can represent the change trend of the initial infiltration rate to a certain extent.[Conclusion] Comprehensive comparisons of the water characteristics of different ratios of improved gravel soil showed that, when the overlying soil layer is a water storage layer, a gravel soil to clay soil ratio of 7:3 can be selected as the optimal ratio for improved gravel soil. When the overlying soil layer is a non-storage layer that is not capable of storing water, a gravel soil to clay soil ratio of 3:7 can be selected as the optimal ratio for improved gravel soil.

    参考文献
    [1] 吴学敏.改性糯米基材加固震损碎石土斜坡抗侵蚀能力研究[D].四川成都:成都理工大学,2021. Wu Xuemin. Study on anti-erosion ability of modified glutinous rice substrate to strengthen earthquake-damaged gravel slope[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan:Chengdu University of Technology, 2021.
    [2] 赵佳琪,陈晓琳,李玉灵.冀东矿区不同植被恢复类型尾矿基质粒径组成和养分特征研究[J].林业与生态科学,2021,36(3):262-268. Zhao Jiaqi, Chen Xiaolin, Li Yuling. Study on the particle size composition and nutrient characteristics of different vegetation restoration in the eastern mining area of Hebei Province[J]. Forestry and Ecological Sciences, 2021,36(3):262-268.
    [3] 邱学礼,高福宏,方波,等.不同土壤改良措施对植烟土壤理化性状的影响[J].西南农业学报,2011,24(6):2270-2273. Qiu Xueli, Gao Fuhong, Fang Bo, et al. Effects of different soil improvement measures on physical and chemical properties of tobacco soil[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011,24(6):2270-2273.
    [4] 程东娟,王利书,郭海刚,等.有机硅对土壤水分有效性和蒸发特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2022(9):88-92. Cheng Dongjuan, Wang Lishu, Guo Haigang, et al. Effects of organic silicone on soil water availability and evaporation characteristics[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2022(9):88-92.
    [5] 颜永毫,郑纪勇,张兴昌,等.生物炭添加对黄土高原典型土壤田间持水量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):120-124. Yan Yonghao, Zheng Jiyong, Zhang Xingchang, et al. Impact of biochar addition into typical soils on field capacity in Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013,27(4):120-124.
    [6] 李琳.污泥改良沙土过程水分在复合介质中运移蒸发规律研究[D].辽宁沈阳:沈阳建筑大学,2019. Li Lin. Study on the law of water transport and evaporation in composite medium during the process of sludge improves sand[D]. Shenyang, Liaoning:Shenyang Jianzhu University, 2019.
    [7] 王志刚,毕银丽,宋子恒,等.东部草原露天矿区粘土改良模拟研究[J].生态学报,2018,38(16):5865-5875. Wang Zhigang, Bi Yinli, Song Ziheng, et al. Substrate compositions facilitate clay restoration of the simulation study in an opencast coal mine in the eastern steppe of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(16):5865-5875.
    [8] 张露,韩霁昌,王欢元,等.砒砂岩与风沙土复配后的粒度组成变化[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(2):44-49. Zhang Lu, Han Jichang, Wang Huanyuan, et al. Grain size composition change after feldspathic sandstone and aeolian sandy soil compounding[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015,13(2):44-49.
    [9] 王佳欢,杨新兵,刘彦林,等.采石废弃地弃渣与农田土混合土壤粒径特征及水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(3):338-344. Wang Jiahuan, Yang Xinbing, Liu Yanlin, et al. Experimental study on particle size characteristics and hydrological effect of mixed soil of quarrying waste residue and farmland soil[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(3):338-344.
    [10] 黄昌勇,徐建明.土壤学[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2010. Huang Changyong, Xu Jianming. Pedology[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2010.
    [11] 晁建红.基于滤纸法的黄土土-水特征曲线测试[D].陕西西安:长安大学,2017. Chao Jian-hong. Experimental Study on soil-water characteristic curve of loess using filter paper method[D]. Xian, Shaanxi:Changan University, 2017.
    [12] ASTM. Standard test method for measurement of soil potential (suction) using filter paper:ASTM D5298-10[S] USA:ASTM, 2010.
    [13] 刘贤赵,李嘉竹,张振华.土壤持水曲线van Genuchten模型求参的一种新方法[J].土壤学报,2007,44(6):1135-1138. Liu Xianzhao, Li Jiazhu, Zhang Zhenhua. A new method to estimating parameters of van Genuchten model for soil water retention[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2007,44(6):1135-1138.
    [14] 刘奉银,张昭,周冬,等.影响GCTS土水特征曲线仪试验结果的因素及曲线合理性分析[J].西安理工大学学报,2010,26(3):320-325. Liu Fengyin, Zhang Zhao, Zhou Dong, et al. Debugging of GCTS-type SWCC device and analysis of the corresponding technical indexes[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Technology, 2010,26(3):320-325.
    [15] 原林虎.Philip入渗模型参数预报模型研究与应用[D].山西太原:太原理工大学,2013. Yuan Linhu. Research and application of Philip infiltration model parameters prediction[D]. Taiyuan, Shanxi:Taiyuan University of Technology, 2013.
    [16] Kostiakov A N. On the dynamics of the coeffient of water percolation in soils and on the necessity of studying it froma dynamic point of view for purposes of amelioration[J]. Soil Science, 1932,97(1):17-21.
    [17] Holton H N. A concept for intfiltration estimates in watershed engineering[J]. Dept, Agr. Res. Service, 1961,39(30):41-51.
    [18] Philip J R. The theory of infiltration[J]. Soil Science,1957,83(5):345-358.
    [19] 冉艳玲,王益权,张润霞,等.保水剂对土壤持水特性的作用机理研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(5):101-107. Ran Yanling, Wang Yiquan, Zhang Runxia, et al. Research on the mechanism of super absorbent polymer to soil water-holding characteristic[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2015,33(5):101-107.
    [20] 王艳艳.子牙河流域土壤结构分形与其水力性质关系研究[D].河南郑州:华北水利水电大学,2020. Wang Yanyan. Study on the relationship between fractal of soil structure and hydraulic properties in Ziya River basin[D]. Zhengzhou, Henan:North China University of Water Resources and Electric power, 2020.
    [21] 丁新原,周智彬,雷加强,等.塔里木沙漠公路防护林土壤水分特征曲线模型分析与比较[J].干旱区地理,2015,38(5):985-993. Ding Xinyuan, Zhou Zhibin, Lei Jiaqiang, et al. Analysis and comparison of models for soil water characteristic curves of Tarim Desert highway Shelterbelt[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2015,38(5):985-993.
    [22] 董义阳,赵成义,于志同,等.古尔班通古特沙漠南缘丘间地土壤水分特征曲线及模拟[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):166-171. Dong Yiyang, Zhao Chengyi, Yu Zhitong, et al. Characteristic curves and models analysis of soil water in interdune at the southern edge of Gurbantunggut Desert[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,31(1):166-171.
    [23] 胡杨,张俊娇,史常青,等.保水剂用量对排土场土壤持水性的影响[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2022,20(2):115-123. Hu Yang, Zhang Junjiao, Shi Changqing, et al. Effects of water-retaining agent content on the water-holding characteristics of soil in waste dump[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,20(2):115-123.
    [24] 张建丰.黄土区层状土入渗特性及其指流的实验研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2004. Zhang Jianfeng. Experimental study on infiltration characteristics and finger flow in layer soils of the loess area[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi:Northwest A&F University, 2004.
    [25] 包含,侯立柱,刘江涛,等.室内模拟降雨条件下土壤水分入渗及再分布试验[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(7):70-75. Bao Han, Hou Lizhu, Liu Jiangtao, et al. Experiment on process of soil water infiltration and redistribution under simulated rainfall[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011,27(7):70-75.
    [26] 杨博,张虎元,赵天宇,等.改性黄土渗透性与孔隙结构的依存关系[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(6):96-101. Yang Bo, Zhang Huyuan, Zhao Tianyu, et al. Responsibility of permeability of modified loess soil on microstructure[J]. Hydrogeology&Engineering Geology, 2011,38(6):96-101.
    [27] 摄晓燕,张兴昌,魏孝荣.适量砒砂岩改良风沙土的吸水和保水特性[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(14):115-123. She Xiaoyan, Zhang Xingchang, Wei Xiaorong. Improvement of water absorbing and holding capacities of sandy soil by appropriate amount of soft rock[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014,30(14):115-123.
    [28] 李帅霖,王霞,王朔,等.生物炭施用方式及用量对土壤水分入渗与蒸发的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):135-144. Li Shuailin, Wang Xia, Wang Shuo, et al. Effects of application patterns and amount of biochar on water infiltration and evaporation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016,32(14):135-144.
    [29] 焦卫国,詹良通,季永新,等.黄土-碎石毛细阻滞覆盖层储水能力实测与分析[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(6):1149-1157. Jiao Weiguo, Zhan Liangtong, Ji Yongxin, et al. Field tests on water storage capacity of loess-gravel capillary barrier covers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019,41(6):1149-1157.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

朱锦宇,裴向军,肖维阳,张晓超,张文翔,王益.九寨沟黏性土含量对改良碎石土水分特性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(1):40-49,85

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:202
  • 下载次数: 812
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-01
  • 最后修改日期:2023-09-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-26

网站版权 © 《水土保持通报》编辑部

京ICP备14043443号-5