聚丙烯酰胺对花岗岩砂土分离与产沙过程的影响
作者:
中图分类号:

S157.1

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划“长江中下游坡耕地红黄壤与中低产稻田产能提升技术模式及应用”(2021YFD1901201);国家自然科学基金面上项目“花岗岩风化土体裂隙演化机制及其对崩岗侵蚀的影响”(42277329)


Effects of Polyacrylamide on Detachment and Sediment Production Process of Granite-derived Sandy Soil
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [30]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探究聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)施用对花岗岩母质发育砂土分离与产沙过程的影响,明确PAM改良砂土抗蚀性的浓度阈值,为崩岗侵蚀防治提供依据。[方法] 选取崩岗侵蚀区花岗岩母质发育的砂土,设置5个PAM施入水平(0‰,1‰,3‰,5‰,7‰),通过径流冲刷模拟试验,研究不同水力条件下砂土产沙速率、分离速率及细沟可蚀性对PAM施用浓度的响应规律。[结果] ①PAM显著降低了砂土的产沙速率、分离速率和细沟可蚀性,且显著提高了临界剪切力(p<0.01)。PAM的减沙效应随冲刷时间的增加呈降低后稳定的趋势,而随其施用浓度的增加逐渐增大。当PAM施用浓度在5‰以内时平均减沙效果最明显。②土壤分离速率与PAM施用浓度呈极显著的负相关关系(p<0.001),但随着PAM施用浓度的增加,分离速率的降低速率逐渐减缓,且PAM(F=37.39,p<0.001)对土壤分离与产沙过程的作用大于水流剪切力(F=15.38,p<0.001)。③PAM处理组与CK的细沟可蚀性之比与PAM浓度呈二次函数关系(R2=0.996,p<0.001),且5‰的PAM对细沟可蚀性的降低效率最显著。[结论] 施用PAM有效降低了花岗岩砂土的产沙速率、分离速率与细沟可蚀性,提高了其临界剪切力,改良效果在PAM施用浓度低于5‰时呈不断增加的趋势,而PAM施用浓度大于5‰时改良效果没有明显变化。因此,建议5‰为PAM改良花岗岩砂土抗蚀性的浓度阈值。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The effects of Polyacrylamide (PAM) applicated in separation and sediment yield process of sandy soil developed from granite parent material were determined, and the concentration threshold of PAM to increase erosion resistance of sandy soil was clarified to provide a basis for the control of Benggang erosion.[Method] Sandy soil developed from granite parent materials in Benggang erosion areas was selected. Five levels of PAM application concentrations (0 %, 1 %, 3 %, 5 %, 7 %) were set. Through runoff scouring simulation experiments, the response patterns of sediment yield rate, detachment rate, and rill erodibility of sandy soils to PAM concentration under different hydraulic conditions were studied.[Results] ① PAM significantly reduced sediment yield, detachment rate, and rill erodibility, but dramatically increased critical shear strength (p<0.01). Additionally, the sediment yield reduction effect of PAM showed a decreasing and stabilizing trend with increasing scouring time, but gradually increased with increasing application concentration, with the most pronounced average sediment reduction effect observed when PAM concentration was within 5 %. ② There was a highly significant negative correlation between soil detachment rate and PAM application concentration (p<0.001). However, as PAM application concentration increased, the rate of decrease in soil detachment rate gradually slowed down, and the effect of PAM (F=37.39, p<0.001) on soil detachment and sediment yield processes was greater than the shear strength of runoff (F=15.38, p<0.001). ③ The ratio of rill erodibility between the PAM-treated groups and the control showed a quadratic function relationship with PAM concentration (R2=0.996, p<0.001), and the efficiency of reducing rill erodibility was most significant at 5 % PAM.[Conclusion] The application of PAM effectively reduced the sediment yield rate, detachment rate, and rill erodibility of granite-derived sandy soil and increased its critical shear force. The improvement effect of PAM application showed a continuous increasing trend when the PAM application concentration was below 5 %. However, when the PAM application concentration exceeded 5 %, the improvement effect showed only a slight change. Therefore, 5 % should be considered as the concentration threshold for PAM to improve the erosion resistance of granite-derived sandy soil.

    参考文献
    [1] 蔡强国,吴淑安,马绍嘉,等.花岗岩发育红壤坡地侵蚀产沙规律试验研究[J].泥沙研究,1996(1):89-96. Cai Qiangguo, Wu Shuan, Ma Shaojia, et al. Experimental study on slope soil erosion and sediment yield of granite-developed red soil[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 1996(1):89-96.
    [2] Wei Yujie, Liu Zheng, Wu Xinliang, et al. Can Benggang be regarded as gully erosion[J]. Catena, 2021,207:105648.
    [3] Xu Jiongxin. Benggang erosion:The influencing factors[J]. Catena, 1996,27(3/4):249-263.
    [4] Chen Jialin, Zhou Man, Lin Jinshi, et al. Comparison of soil physicochemical properties and mineralogical compositions between noncollapsible soils and collapsed gullies[J]. Geoderma, 2018,317:56-66.
    [5] 吴志峰,王继增.华南花岗岩风化壳岩土特性与崩岗侵蚀关系[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):31-35. Wu Zhifeng, Wang Jizeng. Relationship between slope disintegration and rock soil characteristics of granite weathering mantle in South China[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2000,14(2):31-35.
    [6] Wei Yujie, Wu Xinliang, Xia Jinwen, et al. The effect of water content on the shear strength characteristics of granitic soils in South China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019,187:50-59.
    [7] Wei Yujie, Cai Chongfa, Guo Zhonglu, et al. Linkage between aggregate stability of granitic soils and the permanent gully erosion in Subtropical China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2022,221:105411.
    [8] Zhou Xiaoquan, Wei Yujie, He Jie, et al. Estimation of gully erosion rate and its determinants in a granite area of Southeast China[J]. Geoderma, 2023,429:116223.
    [9] Tao Yu, He Yangbo, Duan Xiaoqian, et al. Preferential flows and soil moistures on a Benggang slope:Determined by the water and temperature co-monitoring[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017,553:678-690.
    [10] 张大林,刘希林.崩岗侵蚀地貌的演变过程及阶段划分[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2011,6(2):23-28. Zhang Dalin, Liu Xilin. Evolution and phases division of collapsed gully erosion landform[J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2011,6(2):23-28.
    [11] Liao Yishan, Yuan Zaijian, Zheng Mingguo, et al. The spatial distribution of Benggang and the factors that influence it[J]. Land Degradation&Development, 2019,30(18):2323-2335.
    [12] 曹丽花,赵世伟,梁向锋,等.PAM对黄土高原主要土壤类型水稳性团聚体的改良效果及机理研究[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(1):45-49. Cao Lihua, Zhao Shiwei, Liang Xiangfeng, et al. Improvement effects of PAM on soil water-stable aggregates and its mechanisms in different soils in the Loess Plateau[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008,24(1):45-49.
    [13] 韩凤朋,郑纪勇,李占斌,等.PAM对土壤物理性状以及水分分布的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(4):70-74. Han Fengpeng, Zheng Jiyong, Li Zhanbin, et al. Effect of PAM on soil physical properties and water distribution[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010,26(4):70-74.
    [14] 陈渠昌,江培福,雷廷武,等.利用PAM防治松散扰动沙土风蚀效果的风洞试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(10):7-11. Chen Quchang, Jiang Peifu, Lei Tingwu, et al. Wind tunnel experiment on the impacts of polyacrylamide on wind erosion of loosen soil materials[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006,22(10):7-11.
    [15] Ben-Hur M. Using synthetic polymers as soil conditioners to control runoff and soil loss in arid and semi-arid regions:A review[J]. Soil Research, 2006,44(3):191.
    [16] Abrol V, Shainberg I, Lado M, et al. Efficacy of dry granular anionic polyacrylamide (PAM) on infiltration, runoff and erosion[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2013,64(5):699-705.
    [17] Mustafa A, Xu Minggang, Ali Shah S A, et al. Soil aggregation and soil aggregate stability regulate organic carbon and nitrogen storage in a red soil of Southern China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020,270:110894.
    [18] 于健,雷廷武,Isaac Shainberg,等.PAM特性对砂壤土入渗及土壤侵蚀的影响[J].土壤学报,2011,48(1):21-27. Yu Jian, Lei Tingwu, Shainberg I, et al. Effects of molecular weight and degree of hydrolysis of PAM on infiltration and erosion of sandy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2011,48(1):21-27.
    [19] Zhang Lun, Gao Feng, Liu Deyu, et al. Estimating sheet erosion on purple soil hillslope treated with polyacrylamide (PAM) in the Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. Journal of Hydrology:Regional Studies, 2023,49:101510.
    [20] Jain R, Mahto V. Evaluation of polyacrylamide/clay composite as a potential drilling fluid additive in inhibitive water based drilling fluid system[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015,133:612-621.
    [21] 张兆福,黄炎和,林金石,等.PAM特性对花岗岩崩岗崩积体径流及产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):1-5. Zhang Zhaofu, Huang Yanhe, Lin Jinshi, et al. Effects of PAM characteristics on runoff and erosion of colluvial deposits in Benggang[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,21(3):1-5.
    [22] 夏海江,杜尧东,孟维忠.聚丙烯酰胺防治坡地土壤侵蚀的室内模拟试验[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(3):14-17. Xia Haijiang, Du Yaodong, Meng Weizhong. Simulated experiment of preventing soil erosionwith polyacrylamide on sloping field[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2000,14(3):14-17.
    [23] 蔺栓保,蒲建国,黄伟.聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)对酒泉地区盐渍化土壤物理性状的影响[J].工程技术研究,2021,6(15):244-246. Lin Shuanbao, Pu Jianguo, Huang Wei. Effect of polyacrylamide (PAM) on physical properties of salinized soil in Jiuquan area[J]. Engineering and Technological Research, 2021,6(15):244-246.
    [24] Karvelis T, Gasiunas G, Siksnys V. Methods for decoding Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences:A brief overview[J]. Methods,2017,121/122:3-8.
    [25] Zhang Guanghui, Liu Baoyuan, Liu Guobin, et al. Detachment of undisturbed soil by shallow flow[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2003,67(3):713-719.
    [26] 王瑄,李占斌,尚佰晓,等.坡面土壤剥蚀率与水蚀因子关系室内模拟试验[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(9):22-26. Wang Xuan, Li Zhanbin, Shang Baixiao, et al. Indoor simulation experiment of the relationship between soil detachment rate and water erosion factor[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008,24(9):22-26.
    [27] Wang Bing, Zhang Guanghui, Yang Yanfen, et al. Response of soil detachment capacity to plant root and soil properties in typical grasslands on the Loess Plateau[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems&Environment, 2018,266:68-75.
    [28] 郝好鑫,郭忠录,王先舟,等.降雨和径流条件下红壤坡面细沟侵蚀过程[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(8):134-140. Hao Haoxin, Guo Zhonglu, Wang Xianzhou, et al. Rill erosion process on red soil slope under interaction of rainfall and scouring flow[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017,33(8):134-140.
    [29] Liu Fa, Zhang Guanghui, Sun Fubao, et al. Quantifying the surface covering, binding and bonding effects of biological soil crusts on soil detachment by overland flow[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2017,42(15):2640-2648.
    [30] Geng Ren, Zhang Guanghui, Ma Qianhong, et al. Effects of landscape positions on soil resistance to rill erosion in a small catchment on the Loess Plateau[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2017,160:95-108.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张澍,张光辉,张勇,戴中山,徐俊康,魏玉杰.聚丙烯酰胺对花岗岩砂土分离与产沙过程的影响[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(1):68-75

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:148
  • 下载次数: 861
  • HTML阅读次数: 718
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-29
  • 最后修改日期:2024-01-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-26