基于综合视角的县域国土空间冲突测度与功能优化——以江西省宜黄县为例
作者:
中图分类号:

F301.24

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金重点项目“土地整理中农户宅基地退出决策行为分析及管控措施研究”(41261041)


Measurement and Function Optimization of County Territorial Spatial Conflict Based on Comprehensive Perspective -A Case Study of Yihuang County, Jiangxi Province
Author:
  • Xiang Fangfang

    Xiang Fangfang

    School of Surveying, Mapping and Spatial Information Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China;Key Laboratory of Mine Environmental Monitoring and Improving Around Poyang Lake of Ministry of Natural Resources, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • Huang Liping

    Huang Liping

    School of Surveying, Mapping and Spatial Information Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China;Key Laboratory of Mine Environmental Monitoring and Improving Around Poyang Lake of Ministry of Natural Resources, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • Chen Rongqing

    Chen Rongqing

    School of Surveying, Mapping and Spatial Information Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China;Key Laboratory of Mine Environmental Monitoring and Improving Around Poyang Lake of Ministry of Natural Resources, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [35]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 测度国土空间冲突强度,分区探讨国土空间冲突管理和优化国土空间利用途径,为县域国土空间可持续开发利用提供新的思路。[方法] 以江西省宜黄县为例,通过景观生态指数模型、可开发强度分析、用地现状与适宜性评价叠加3种方法,以"把握景观格局-明确开发强度-摸底适宜性-实现功能优化"综合视角为导向,构建综合视角下国土空间冲突测度模型,识别乡镇尺度下空间显著冲突与区域本位基底相耦合的综合冲突类型区,进而提出功能优化措施。[结果] ①2010-2020年宜黄县城镇化趋势扩大,生态空间的容纳度变低,国土空间主要表现为农业生产空间和生态空间向工矿生产空间和城镇生活空间转移。②2010-2020年宜黄县区域空间冲突强度加剧,不同时段和区域下空间冲突强度和分布情况差异显著,可控空间主要分布在南部,轻度和中度冲突在域内分布较为均匀,重度冲突主要分布在北部、中部和东部。③根据开发强度和冲突产生诱因,可将宜黄县乡镇划分为地形发展劣势区、城镇开发密集区和自然保护地集中区3类,作为空间功能优化的重点。④宜黄县乡镇尺度上空间冲突类型区分布存在差异性,表现为:农业空间与生态空间冲突>城镇空间与生态空间冲突>城镇空间冲突>农业空间冲突。⑤由综合冲突测度模型,得到宜黄县域内包含8种综合冲突组合,归并后可分为城镇扩张无序、城镇规模扩张、城镇规划不当、总体发展滞后和城镇发展滞后5种冲突类型。[结论] 2010-2020年宜黄县空间冲突强度加剧,区域生态安全和粮食安全受到不断挑战。应当加强空间冲突分区管控,针对性优化区域国土空间资源开发利用。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The intensity of spatial conflicts was measured and ways to strengthen the management of territorial space conflicts were determined at county scale, and the utilization of territorial space was optimized in different regions in order to provide new ideas for the sustainable development and utilization of territorial space at the county level.[Methods] Taking Yihuang County in Jiangxi Province for example, the three methods of landscape ecological index model, exploitable intensity analysis, and land use status and suitability evaluation were used in conjunction with guidance provided from the comprehensive perspective of "grasp landscape pattern-clarify development intensity-determine suitability-realize function optimization" to construct a comprehensive spatial conflict measurement model. Impact type areas with significant spatial conflicts coupled with regional bases at the township scale were identified, and functional optimization measures were proposed.[Results] ① At Yihuang County from 2010 to 2020, urbanization expanded and the accommodation degree of ecological space declined. The main change trend was that the agricultural production space and ecological space were transferred to the industrial and mining production space and the urban living space. ② From 2010 to 2020, the intensity of regional conflicts intensified, and there were significant differences in intensity and distribution in different periods and regions. The controllable space was mainly located in the southern part of the study area. The mild and moderate conflicts were evenly distributed in the region. The severe conflicts were mainly located in the northern, central, and eastern areas. ③ According to the analysis of development intensity and the causes of conflict, the towns and villages could be divided into three categories:disadvantaged areas of terrain development, intensive areas of urban development, and concentrated areas of nature protection, which are the key points of spatial function optimization; ④ At the township scale, there were differences in the distribution of spatial conflict types, and the conflict areas followed the order of agricultural space and ecological space conflict > urban space and ecological space conflict > urban space conflict > agricultural space conflict; ⑤ From the comprehensive conflict measurement model, it can be concluded that there were eight kinds of comprehensive conflict combinations within the region, which could be divided into five conflict types after merging:disorderly urban expansion, urban scale expansion, improper urban planning, overall development lag and urban development lag.[Conclusion] The intensity of spatial conflicts in Yihuang County increased during 2010 to 2020, and regional ecological security and food security were constantly challenged. Therefore, regional control of spatial conflicts should be strengthened to optimize the development and utilization of regional territorial space resources.

    参考文献
    [1] 于伯华,吕昌河.土地利用冲突分析:概念与方法[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(3):106-115. Yu Bohua, Lv Changhe. The progress and prospect of land use conflicts[J]. Progress in Geography, 2006,25(3):106-115.
    [2] 周德,徐建春,王莉.近15年来中国土地利用冲突研究进展与展望[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(2):21-29. Zhou De, Xu Jianchun, Wang Li. Process of land use conflict research in China during the past fifteen years[J]. China Land Sciences, 2015,29(2):21-29.
    [3] 陈竹安,冯祥瑞,洪志强,等.南昌市土地利用的空间冲突风险评估及分区优化研究:基于"三生空间"视角[J].世界地理研究,2021,30(3):533-545. Chen Zhuan, Feng Xiangrui, Hong Zhiqiang, et al. Research on spatial conflict calculation and zoning optimization of land use in Nanchang City from the perspective of "three living spaces"[J]. World Regional Studies, 2021,30(3):533-545.
    [4] 徐建春,周国锋,徐之寒,等.城市雾霾管控:土地利用空间冲突与城市风道[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(10):49-56. Xu Jianchun, Zhou Guofeng, Xu Zhihan, et al. Urban haze governance:Land use spatial conflict and governance urban air duct[J]. China Land Sciences, 2015,29(10):49-56.
    [5] 孟宝,邓伟,彭立.基于地理学的空间认识及中国国土空间功能优化方向分析[J].生态经济,2019,35(9):170-176. Meng Bao, Deng Wei, Peng Li. Understanding of space and optimized of China territory space functional based on geography[J]. Ecological Economy, 2019,35(9):170-176.
    [6] 周国华,彭佳捷.空间冲突的演变特征及影响效应:以长株潭城市群为例[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(6):717-723. Zhou Guohua, Peng Jiajie. The evolution characteristics and influence effect of spatial conflict:A case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(6):717-723.
    [7] 谭术魁.中国土地冲突的概念、特征与触发因素研究[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(4):4-11. Tan Shukui. Research on concept,characters and trigger factors of land conflicts in China[J]. China Land Science, 2008,22(4):4-11.
    [8] 邹利林,刘彦随,王永生.中国土地利用冲突研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(2):298-309. Zou Lilin, Liu Yansui, Wang Yongsheng. Research progress and prospect of land-use conflicts in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(2):298-309.
    [9] 刘巧芹,赵华甫,吴克宁,等.基于用地竞争力的潜在土地利用冲突识别研究:以北京大兴区为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(8):1579-1589. Liu Qiaoqin, Zhao Huafu, Wu Kening, et al. Identifying potential land use conflict based on competitiveness of different land use types in Beijing, China[J]. Resources Science, 2014,36(8):1579-1589.
    [10] Soytong P, Perera R. Spatial analysis of the environmental conflict between state,society and industry at the Map Ta Phut-Rayong conurbation in Thailand[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2017,19(3):839-862.
    [11] 张潇,谷人旭.土地利用冲突的时空格局刻画与多情景模拟研究:以长江三角洲城市群为例[J].地理研究,2022,41(5):1311-1326. Zhang Xiao, Gu Renxu. Spatio-temporal pattern and multi-scenario simulation of land use conflict:A case study of the Yangtze River delta urban agglomeration[J]. Geographical Research, 2022,41(5):1311-1326.
    [12] 彭佳捷,周国华,唐承丽,等.基于生态安全的快速城市化地区空间冲突测度:以长株潭城市群为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(9):1507-1519. Peng Jiajie, Zhou Guohua, Tang Chengli, et al. The analysis of spatial conflict measurement in fast urbanization region based on ecological security:A case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-xiangtan urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012,27(9):1507-1519.
    [13] 程进.我国生态脆弱民族地区空间冲突及治理机制研究:以甘肃省甘南藏族自治州为例[D].上海:华东师范大学,2013. Cheng Jin. Spatial conflict and governance mechanism in ecologically fragile ethnic areas in our country:A case study of Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Gansu Province[D]. Shanghai:East China Normal University, 2013.
    [14] 李占军,刁承泰.西南丘陵地区土地资源利用的冲突与协调:以重庆江津区为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(2):239-244. Li Zhanjun, Diao Chengtai. Land resource conflicts and coordination in hilly area of Southwestern China:A case study of Jiangjin District, Chongqing[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009,16(2):239-244.
    [15] 徐增让,郑鑫,靳茗茗.自然保护区土地利用冲突及协调:以羌塘国家自然保护区为例[J].科技导报,2018,36(7):8-13. Xu Zengrang, Zheng Xin, Jin Mingming. Harmonizing conflicts of land multifunction in natural reserves-Qiangtang National Natural Reserve as an example[J]. Science&Technology Review, 2018,36(7):8-13.
    [16] Albrechts L. How to enhance creativity, diversity and sustainability in spatial planning:Strategic planning revisited[M]//Cerreta M, Concilio G, Monno V. Making Strategies in Spatial Planning.Dordrecht:Springer, 2010:3-25.
    [17] 廖李红,戴文远,陈娟,等.平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):1823-1833. Liao Lihong, Dai Wenyuan, Chen Juan, et al. Spatial conflict between ecological-production-living spaces on Pingtan Island during rapid urbanization[J]. Resources Science, 2017,39(10):1823-1833.
    [18] Brown G G, Reed P. Social landscape metrics:Measures for understanding place values from public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS)[J]. Landscape Research, 2012,37(1):73-90.
    [19] 杨永芳,安乾,朱连奇.基于PSR模型的农区土地利用冲突强度的诊断[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(11):1552-1560. Yang Yongfang, An Qian, Zhu Lianqi. Diagnosis based on the PSR model of rural land-use conflicts intensity[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(11):1552-1560.
    [20] 曾昉,魏媛.城市土地利用生态冲突诊断及影响因素研究:以贵阳市为例[J].改革与战略,2016,32(9):107-113. Zeng Fang, Wei Yuan. Study on the influencing factors of ecological conflict of urban land use in China:Take Guiyang as example[J]. Reformation&Strategy, 2016,32(9):107-113.
    [21] 贺艳华,唐承丽,周国华,等.基于地理学视角的快速城市化地区空间冲突测度:以长株潭城市群地区为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(10):1660-1674. He Yanhua, Tang Chengli, Zhou Guohua, et al. The analysis of spatial conflict measurement in fast urbanization region from the perspective of geography:A case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014,29(10):1660-1674.
    [22] 陈威,刘学录.基于适宜性评价的潜在土地利用冲突诊断研究:以云南省红河县为例[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2015,50(1):123-130. Chen Wei, Liu Xuelu. The research on identification of potential land use conflict based on suitability evaluation:A case study on Honghe County of Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2015,50(1):123-130.
    [23] 江颂,蒙吉军.土地利用冲突研究进展:内容与方法[J].干旱区地理,2021,44(3):877-887. Jiang Song, Meng Jijun. Process of land use conflict research:contents and methods[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021,44(3):877-887.
    [24] 赵旭,汤峰,张蓬涛,等.基于CLUE-S模型的县域生产-生活-生态空间冲突动态模拟及特征分析[J].生态学报,2019,39(16):5897-5908. Zhao Xu, Tang Feng, Zhang Pengtao, et al. Dynamic simulation and characteristic analysis of County production-living-ecological spatial conflicts based on CLUE-S model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(16):5897-5908.
    [25] Karimi A, Hockings M. A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and management[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2018,33(5):691-710.
    [26] 刘菁华,李伟峰,周伟奇,等.京津冀城市群景观格局变化机制与预测[J].生态学报,2017,37(16):5324-5333. Liu Jinghua, Li Weifeng, Zhou Weiqi, et al. Simulation and prediction of changes in the landscape patterns of the BeijingTianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region and their driving mechanisms[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(16):5324-5333.
    [27] 余亮亮,蔡银莺,罗成.湖北省国土空间规划管制测度及空间相关性分析[J].地理与地理信息科学,2020,36(3):97-103. Yu Liangliang, Cai Yinying, Luo Cheng. Measurement and spatial correlation analysis of spatial regulation of land use:A case study of Hubei Province[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2020,36(3):97-103.
    [28] 张磊,马超前,王艳霞,等.适宜性与冲突双重约束下生态空间管制分区研究:以天津市宝坻区为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2022,38(2):96-102. Zhang Lei, Ma Chaoqian, Wang Yanxia, et al. Research on ecological space regulation zoning under the dual constraints of space conflict and suitability:A case study of Baodi District, Tianjin[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2022,38(2):96-102.
    [29] 黄安,许月卿,卢龙辉,等."生产-生活-生态"空间识别与优化研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(3):503-518. Huang An, Xu Yueqing, Lu Longhui, et al. Research progress of the identification and optimization of production-living-ecological spaces[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(3):503-518.
    [30] 孟宝.宜宾市国土空间功能解析与优化对策研究[D].四川成都:中国科学院大学(中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所),2020. Meng Bao. Spatial function analysis and optimization of Yibin City[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS), 2020.
    [31] 杨永芳,朱连奇.土地利用冲突的理论与诊断方法[J].资源科学,2012,34(6):1134-1141. Yang Yongfang, Zhu Lianqi. The theory and diagnostic methods of land use conflicts[J]. Resources Science, 2012,34(6):1134-1141.
    [32] Meng Bao, Zhang Shaoyao, Deng Wei, et al. Identification and analysis of territorial spatial utilization conflicts in Yibin based on multidimensional perspective[J]. Land, 2023,12(5):1008.
    [33] 毛端谦,梁国权.土地利用多目标规划的研究:以江西省新建县为例[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),1995,19(4):358-363. Mao Duanqian, Liang Guoquan. A study on prediction of land utilization structure of Xinjian County[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 1995,19(4):358-363.
    [34] 陈学兄,常庆瑞,毕如田,等.地形起伏度最佳统计单元算法的比较研究[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):52-56. Chen Xuexiong, Chang Qingrui, Bi Rutian, et al. Comparison study on the best statistical unit algorithms of relief amplitude[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,25(1):52-56.
    [35] 徐玲玲.基于GIS技术的区域开发强度测算研究:以兴城市为例[D].辽宁大连:辽宁师范大学,2009. Xu Lingling. Research on measuring regional development intensity based on GIS technology:A case study of Xingcheng City. Dalian, Liaoning:Liaoning Normal University, 2009.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

向芳芳,黄丽萍,陈荣清.基于综合视角的县域国土空间冲突测度与功能优化——以江西省宜黄县为例[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(1):158-171

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:148
  • 下载次数: 733
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-28
  • 最后修改日期:2023-08-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-26