河北省2010—2020年生态产品价值空间演变特征及其影响因素
作者:
中图分类号:

X171.1;F301.2

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“多尺度城市地价分异规律”(41471090);河北省引进留学人员资助项目(C20230510);河北省文化艺术科学规划和旅游研究项目(HB23-YB063)


Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Affecting Factors of Ecological Product Value in Hebei Province from 2010 to 2020
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [34]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 评估河北省生态产品价值(EPV),探索其空间演变背后的驱动因子,为构筑京津冀生态安全屏障,加快生态文明建设提供科学依据。[方法] 基于当量因子法核算2010,2015,2020年河北省168个县区的EPV,利用全局莫兰指数、高/低聚类指数、热点分析法分析其空间分布演变和聚类演变特征,并借助地理探测器探测其主要驱动力。[结果] ①2010-2020年河北省EPV均突破3.80×1011元,整体上大幅提高,呈先平稳后急速上升的态势,到2020年突破4.20×1011元;林地EPV最高,始终是所占比例最大的生态产品类型,水域次之且始终是变化量和变化率最大的类型。②2010-2015年EPV空间分布呈现出北高南低,西高东低的特征,高值集中于北部的燕山、坝上高原地区和西部的太行山地区,低值集中于东南部的河北平原地区;2015-2020年呈现出北高南低,东西高,中部低的特征。③2010-2020年空间聚类表现为显著高值集聚,冷热点分布呈现与空间分布相似的规律。④从单因子探测看,CO表面浓度、O3浓度、年均气温是EPV空间演变的主导因子,人均GDP次之,社会因子的解释力相对最弱;从双因子交互探测看,3期中起主导作用的组合因子分别是人均GDP∩NO2表面浓度、高程∩O3浓度和人均GDP∩CO表面浓度,其解释度(q值)分别为0.71,0.73,0.66。[结论] 林地和水域对提高生态产品价值具有重要作用,但空间上差距较大,为使其产生更加积极变化,不仅要考虑生态单因子的强大驱动力,也应充分认识驱动力来源的复杂性和非线性。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The ecological product values (EPV) in Hebei Province were evaluated and the driving factors of their spatial change were also explored, in order to provide a scientific foundation for establishing an ecological security barrier in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region while expediting ecological civilization development.[Methods] The EPV were computed for 168 counties in Hebei Province during 2010, 2015, and 2020 by use of the equivalent factor method. Spatial distribution evolution and clustering characteristics were analyzed utilizing the global Moran index, high/low clustering index, and the hotspot analysis method. Geographic detector was employed to identify the primary driving forces.[Results] ① Between 2010 and 2020, Hebei Province's EPV surpassed 3.80×1011 yuan, exhibiting notable overall improvement. EPV exhibited a pattern of gradual increase followed by rapid growth, exceeding 4.20×1011 yuan by 2020. Forest land had the highest EPV, consistently dominating the ecological product types. Water areas had the next highest EPV, and experienced the most substantial changes in both amount and rate. ② During 2010 to 2015, EPV's spatial distribution exhibited a north-south and west-east dichotomy, with high values concentrated in the Northern Yanshan and Bashang Plateau regions, as well as in the Western Taihang Mountain area, while lower values clustered in the Southeastern Hebei Plain. During 2015 to 2020, the north-south divide persisted, with added east-west variation and central low values. ③ From 2010 to 2020, significant high-value clustering was observed spatially, mirroring the distribution pattern of cold and hot spots. ④ Single-factor analysis identified CO surface concentration, O3 concentration, and average annual temperature as primary influencers of EPV's spatial evolution. Per capita GDP emerged as the secondary vital factor, while the impact of social factors remained comparatively weak. Dual-factor interaction analysis revealed that the leading combinations of factors during the three periods were per capita GDP ∩ NO2 surface concentration, elevation ∩ O3 concentration, and per capita GDP ∩ CO surface concentration, with corresponding q values of 0.71, 0.73, and 0.66, respectively.[Conclusion] While forest land and water areas hold pivotal roles in augmenting EPV, significant spatial disparities exist. To drive more positive transformations, it is essential to not only consider robust ecological single-factor drivers, but also to comprehensively grasp the intricate and nonlinear nature of driving force origins.

    参考文献
    [1] 廖福霖.生态产品价值实现[J].绿色中国,2017(13):50-53. Liao Fulin. The realization of ecological product value[J]. Green China, 2017(13):50-53.
    [2] 李芬,张林波,舒俭民,等.三江源区生态产品价值核算[J].科技导报,2017,35(6):120-124. Li Fen, Zhang Linbo, Shu Jianmin, et al. Accounting system for products in the ecosystem of the Three-River headwater area[J]. Science&Technology Review, 2017,35(6):120-124.
    [3] 吴昌华,崔丹丹.千年生态系统评估[J].世界环境,2005(3):56-65. Wu Changhua, Cui Dandan. The millennium ecosystem assessment[J]. World Environment, 2005(3):56-65.
    [4] 黄如良.生态产品价值评估问题探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(3):26-33. Huang Ruliang. Study on the ecological product value assessment[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015,25(3):26-33.
    [5] 杨继文.中国环境治理的两种模式:政策协调与制度优化[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2018,24(05):108-116. Yang Jiwen. On two modes of environmental governance in China:Policy coordination and system optimization[J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 2018(5):108-116.
    [6] 张丽佳,周妍.建立健全生态产品价值实现机制的路径探索[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7893-7899. Zhang Lijia, Zhou Yan. Exploration on the path of establishing and improving the value realization mechanism of ecological products[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(19):7893-7899.
    [7] 高晓龙,林亦晴,徐卫华,等.生态产品价值实现研究进展[J].生态学报,2020,40(1):24-33. Gao Xiaolong, Lin Yiqing, Xu Weihua, et al. Research progress on the value realization of ecological products[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(1):24-33.
    [8] Salzman J, Bennett G, Carroll N, et al. The global status and trends of payments for ecosystem services[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2018,1(3):136-144.
    [9] 於方,杨威杉,马国霞,等.生态价值核算的国内外最新进展与展望[J].环境保护,2020,48(14):18-24. Yu Fang, Yang Weishan, Ma Guoxia, et al. The latest development and prospect of ecological value accounting at home and abroad[J]. Environmental Protection, 2020,48(14):18-24.
    [10] 刘江宜,牟德刚.生态产品价值及实现机制研究进展[J].生态经济,2020,36(10):207-212. Liu Jiangyi, Mou Degang. Research progress of ecological product value and its realization mechanism[J]. Ecological Economy, 2020,36(10):207-212.
    [11] Wang Yongyang, Liu Gengyuan, Cai Yanpeng, et al. The ecological value of typical agricultural products:An emergy-based life-cycle assessment framework[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022,10:824275.
    [12] 赵志刚,余德,韩成云,等.鄱阳湖生态经济区生态系统服务价值预测与驱动力[J].生态学报,2017,37(24):8411-8421. Zhao Zhigang, Yu De, Han Chengyun, et al. Ecosystem services value prediction and driving forces in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(24):8411-8421.
    [13] 李子,张艳芳.基于InVEST模型的渭河流域干支流生态系统服务时空演变特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):178-185. Li Zi, Zhang Yanfang. Spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem services in the main and tributaries of Weihe River basin based on InVEST model[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(4):178-185.
    [14] Felipe-Lucia M R, Soliveres S, Penone C, et al. Multiple forest attributes underpin the supply of multiple ecosystem services[J]. Nature Communications, 2018,9:4839.
    [15] Wang Chao, Wang Xiaobo, Liu Dongwei, et al. Aridity threshold in controlling ecosystem nitrogen cycling in arid and semi-arid grasslands[J]. Nature Communications, 2014,5:4799.
    [16] Qiu Jiangxiao, Zipper S C, Motew M, et al. Nonlinear groundwater influence on biophysical indicators of ecosystem services[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2019,2(6):475-483.
    [17] Duan Kai, Sun Ge, Sun Shanlei, et al. Divergence of ecosystem services in U.S. National Forests and Grasslands under a changing climate[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016,6:24441.
    [18] 王盛,李文静.河北省生态系统服务价值时空变化格局分析[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版),2020,38(2):225-232. Wang Sheng, Li Wenjing. Spatio-temporal variation of ecosystem service value in Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 2020,38(2):225-232.
    [19] 王晓萌,潘佩佩,王晓旭,等.基于土地利用的河北省生态系统服务权衡/协同关系研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(1):80-88. Wang Xiaomeng, Pan Peipei, Wang Xiaoxu, et al. Research on ecosystem service trade-off/synergy relationship in Hebei Province based on land use[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2021,37(1):80-88.
    [20] 张蓬涛,刘双嘉,周智,等.京津冀地区生态系统服务供需测度及时空演变[J].生态学报,2021,41(9):3354-3367. Zhang Pengtao, Liu Shuangjia, Zhou Zhi, et al. Supply and demand measurement and spatio-temporal evolution of ecosystem services in Beijing Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(9):3354-3367.
    [21] 张杰,李清泉,吴祥茵,等.基于土地利用的粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务价值及承载力演变分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(21):8375-8386. Zhang Jie, Li Qingquan, Wu Xiangjun, et al. Evolution of the ecosystem services value and carrying capacity in the Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area based on land use changes[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(21):8375-8386.
    [22] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919. Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Lu Chunxia, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919.
    [23] 丁梦婷,裴凤松,胡引翠,等.基于LUCC的江苏省生态系统服务价值时空变化特征研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(19):6801-6811. Ding Mengting, Pei Fengsong, Hu Yincui, et al. Spatial and temporal changes of ecosystem service value in Jiangsu Province based on LUCC[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(19):6801-6811.
    [24] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196. Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Leng Yunfa, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003(2):189-196.
    [25] 王磊,薛雅君,张宇.基于土地利用变化的天津市生态资产价值评估及灰色预测[J].资源开发与市场,2017,33(7):796-801. Wang Lei, Xue Yajun, Zhang Yu. Ecological assets valuation and grey forecast based on land use change in Tianjin City[J]. Resource Development&Market, 2017,33(7):796-801.
    [26] 韩增林,曹锡顶,狄乾斌.基础设施投入效率时空演变及其关联格局研究:基于中国地级以上城市的实证[J].地理科学,2021,41(6):941-950. Han Zenglin, Cao Xiding, Di Qianbin. Spatial-temporal evolution of infrastructure investment efficiency and its correlation pattern based on the empirical study of prefecture-level cities in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021,41(6):941-950.
    [27] 郭津津,樊守彬,王军玲,等.北京市机动车排放的空间聚类特征研究[J].环境科学与技术,2017,40(1):141-146. Guo Jinjin, Fan Shoubin, Wang Junling, et al. Spatial distribution cluster characteristics of vehicle emissions in Beijing[J]. Environmental Science&Technology, 2017,40(1):141-146.
    [28] 姚婧,杨丽君,肖宇婷,等.基于社会-经济因子修正的沱江流域农业面源总磷污染负荷时空演变研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2022,41(5):1022-1035. Yao Jing, Yang Lijun, Xiao Yuting, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of agricultural non-point sources of total phosphorus pollution loads in Tuojiang River watershed based on correction of social-economic factors[J]. Journal of Agro-environment Science, 2022,41(5):1022-1035.
    [29] 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134. Wang Jinfeng, Xu Chengdong. Geodetector:Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(1):116-134.
    [30] 徐勇,郑志威,郭振东,等.2000-2020年长江流域植被NDVI动态变化及影响因素探测[J].环境科学,2022,43(7):3730-3740. Xu Yong, Zheng Zhiwei, Guo Zhendong, et al. Dynamic variation in vegetation cover and its influencing factor detection in the Yangtze River basin from 2000 to 2020[J]. Environmental Science, 2022,43(7):3730-3740.
    [31] 耿甜伟,陈海,张行,等.基于GWR的陕西省生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(7):1714-1727. Geng Tianwei, Chen Hai, Zhang Hang, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of land ecosystem service value and its influencing factors in Shaanxi Province based on GWR[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(7):1714-1727.
    [32] 韩美,孔祥伦,李云龙,等.黄河三角洲"三生"用地转型的生态环境效应及其空间分异机制[J].地理科学,2021,41(6):1009-1018. Han Mei, Kong Xianglun, Li Yunlong, et al. Eco-environmental effects and its spatial heterogeneity of'ecological-production-living'land use transformation in the Yellow River delta[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021,41(6):1009-1018.
    [33] 王彦芳,刘敏,郭英,等.河北省生态环境支撑区生态系统服务价值评估[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):309-316. Wang Yanfang, Liu Min, Guo Ying, et al. Estimation on ecosystem service value in ecological environment support areas of Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,39(2):309-316.
    [34] 李聪聪.河北省土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响研究[D].保定:河北大学,2019. Li Congcong. Study on the influence of land use change on ecosystem service value in Hebei Province[D]. Hebei University, 2019.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

代汝磊,梁彦庆,黄志英,董高洁,顾世杰.河北省2010—2020年生态产品价值空间演变特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(1):247-258

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:114
  • 下载次数: 761
  • HTML阅读次数: 831
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-06
  • 最后修改日期:2023-06-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-26