“23·7”京津冀地区暴雨洪水与土壤侵蚀调查——以河北省邢台市临城县为例
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157.1,P426.616

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金黄河水科学联合基金项目“黄土高原极端暴雨土壤侵蚀致灾及蓄排协调防控机制”(U2243213); 国家重点研发计划黄河中游多沙粗沙区风水复合侵蚀协同治理技术与示范项目“黄土高原风水复合侵蚀生态治理技术识别挖掘和配置模式研究”(2022YFF130080402),“多沙粗沙区水土流失生态治理技术全生命周期抑沙阻沙效益分析”(2022YFF130080403)


Investigation on Rainstorm Flood and Soil Erosion in “23·7” Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region—A Case Study at Lincheng County, Xingtai City, Hebei Province
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 开展“23·7”(20230729—0801)京津冀地区暴雨洪水过程及水土保持调查工作,分析小流域的暴雨洪水过程以及暴雨所造成的土壤侵蚀状况,为水土保持决策提供科学支撑。 [方法] 采用野外调查的方法对河北省临城县皇迷东沟和梁家庄西沟开展洪痕测量调查并计算洪峰流量模数,分析暴雨洪水对小流域造成的侵蚀危害。 [结果] ①该次降雨持续时间长、雨强大。梁家庄西沟和皇迷东沟流域累计雨量分别达到1 008.5和613.6 mm。 ②按洪痕法调查推算了洪峰流量,皇迷东沟、梁家庄西沟小流域洪峰流量模数为10.80和36.07 m3/(s·km2)。坡度和水土保持措施是影响洪峰流量的主要因素。较大的坡度会使洪峰流量变大,而完善的水土保持措施可以起到有效的削峰作用。 ③调查小流域位于泜河流域上游,是该次暴雨中心和洪水的主要产流区,小流域洪峰流量模数大于下游水文站洪峰流量模数。 ④梁家庄西沟的侵蚀情况比皇迷东沟严重,主要原因是皇迷东沟的果园、梯田和谷坊的面积比例大于梁家庄西沟,皇迷东沟的平均坡度小于梁家庄西沟且梁家庄雨量站的降雨量峰值持续时间更长。 [结论] 良好的水土保持措施可以有效减少洪峰流量以及侵蚀现象的发生。实施水土保持措施是必要且有效的。应该进一步完善梯田、台地谷坊的建设。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Investigations on rainstorm and flood processes and soil and water conservation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from July 29 to August 1, 2023 (referried as “7·23”) were carried out, and the rainstorm and flood processes in small basins and soil erosion caused by rainstorm were analyzed, in order to provide scientific support for soil and water conservation decision-making. [Methods] Field survey methods were used, in which flood marks were measured and investigated at Huangmi xigou and the Liangjiazhuang donggou of Lincheng County, Xingtai City, Hebei Province. The flood peak discharge modulus was calculated to analyze the erosion damage caused by rainstorm floods to small watersheds. [Results] ① The rainfall lasted for a long time and was strong. The cumulative rainfall in the Liangjiazhuang donggou valley and the Huangmi xigou valley reached 1 008.5 mm and 613.6 mm, respectively. ② According to the flood mark survey, the peak discharge modulus of the Huangmi xigou and the Liangjiazhuang donggou watersheds were 10.80 m3/(s·km2) and 36.07 m3/(s·km2), respectively. Slope and soil and water conservation measures were the main factors affecting flood peak discharge. Larger slopes will increase flood peak discharge, and soil and water conservation measures could play an effective role in peak reduction. ③ The investigated small watersheds were located in the upper reaches of the river basin, which is the main runoff producing area of the rainstorm center and flood. The peak flood discharge modulus of the small watersheds was larger than that of the downstream hydrology station. ④ The erosion situation of the Liangjiazhuang donggou was more serious than that of the Huangmi xigou, mainly due to the following reasons: the area proportion of orchards, terraces, and check dams in the Huangmi xigou was larger than that of the Huangmi west ditch; the average slope of the Huangmi xigou was smaller than that of the Liangjiazhuang donggou; and the peak duration of rainfall at the Liangjiazhuang rain-measuring station was longer. [Conclusion] Optimized soil and water conservation measures can effectively reduce the occurrence of flood peak discharge and erosion phenomenon. The implementation of soil and water conservation measures is necessary and effective. The construction of terraces and terrace valleys must be further improved.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李天毅,戴宁,丛佩娟,陈恒昌,贾继宏,李扬,贵欣瑞.“23·7”京津冀地区暴雨洪水与土壤侵蚀调查——以河北省邢台市临城县为例[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(2):155-166,214

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-20
  • 最后修改日期:2024-02-21
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-06-05
  • 出版日期: