1990—2020年长江上游“三生”空间转型的生态环境效应及其空间分异机制
作者:
中图分类号:

F301.2

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目“长江上游生态大保护政策可持续性与机制构建研究”(20&ZD095)


Eco-environmental Effects and Spatial Differentiation Mechanism of Transformation of Productional-living-ecological Space in Upper Reaches of Yangtze River
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [25]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 探究“三生”空间转型的生态环境效应及其空间分异机制,可为协调土地高效利用与社会生态可持续发展提供科学依据。[方法] 以长江上游地区为研究对象,采用土地利用转移矩阵、生态环境质量指数对1990—2020年长江上游地区“三生”空间转型规律、生态环境效应的空间分异特征进行定量分析,并结合地理探测器模型识别生态环境质量空间分异的驱动因素。[结果] ①长江上游地区“三生”空间格局分异显著,生态空间广泛分布于流域的西部和南部区域;生产空间集聚在成都平原以及散布在河网水系密集、利于耕作的山间盆地;生活空间以零星状分布在昆明、成都、重庆等中心城市。②生态环境质量总体保持稳定并以较高质量为主,生态环境质量空间格局分布呈中间低、四周高的分布格局,低质量区以团块状和条带状分布在四川盆地和横断山脉北侧,中、高质量区主要分布在长江上游地区外围、西南部和南部区域。③农业生产空间转化为林地生产空间、水域生态空间,以及草地生态空间转化为林地生态空间是促使生态环境质量改善的主要土地转化类型;相反,生态环境质量恶化与林地生态空间转化为农业生产空间、草地生态空间及工业生产空间紧密相关。④地形起伏度、坡度、人口密度以及土地利用强度是影响生态环境质量空间分异的主要驱动因子,自然因素和社会因素的交互作用共同影响长江上游地区生态环境质量。[结论] 长江上游地区生态环境质量总体保持稳定,但局部生态环境恶化趋势不容忽视,在未来政策制定中,应根据各地区的自然条件、主体功能定位以及生态环境承载等实际情况优化“三生”空间用地结构。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The eco-environmental effects and spatial differentiation mechanism of the transformation of productional-living-ecological space were determined, in order to provide a scientific basis for coordinating the efficient use of land and the sustainable development of social ecology. [Methods] Taking the upper reaches of the Yangtze River as the research object, a land use transfer matrix and eco-environmental quality index were used to quantitatively analyze the spatial differentiation characteristics of the productional-living-ecological space transfer law and the eco-environmental effects in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River from 1990 to 2020. The geographical detector model was used to identify the driving factors of spatial differentiation of eco-environmental quality. [Results] ① The productional-living-ecological space pattern in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River was significantly different, and the ecological space was widely distributed in the western and southern regions of the basin. The production space was mainly concentrated in the Chengdu Plain and the intermountain basins scattered in the dense river network that was conducive to farming. The living space was scattered in the central cities such as Kunming, Chengdu, and Chongqing. ② The eco-environmental quality was generally stable and dominated by high quality. The spatial pattern of ecological environmental quality was lower in the central regions and higher in the surrounding areas. The low quality areas were distributed in clumps and strips in the Sichuan Basin and the north side of the Hengduan Mountains. The medium and high quality areas were mainly distributed in the periphery, southwest, and south portions of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. ③ The conversion of agricultural production space into forest land production space and water ecological space, and the conversion of grassland ecological space into forest land ecological space were the main land conversion types that promoted the improvement of eco-environmental quality. In contrast, the deterioration of eco-environmental quality was closely related to the transformation of forest ecological space into agricultural production space, grassland ecological space, and industrial production space. ④ Topographic relief, slope, population density, and land use intensity were the main driving factors affecting the spatial differentiation of eco-environmental quality. The interaction between natural factors and social factors affected the eco-environmental quality in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. [Conclusion] The eco-environmental quality of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River remains relatively stabilized in general, but the trends of local ecological deterioration should not be ignored. With regard to future policy formulation, the land use structure of the productional-living-ecological space should be optimized according to the natural conditions of each region, the main function positioning, the actual situation of the eco-environment, etc.

    参考文献
    [1] 胡荣明,孙妍,史晓亮,等.生态脆弱区土地利用功能转型及其生态环境效应: 以东乡族自治县为例[J].西安理工大学学报,2022,38(3):346-355.Hu Rongming, Sun Yan, Shi Xiaoliang, et al. Transformation of land use function and its ecological environment effects in an ecologically fragile area: A case study of Dongxiang Autonomous County [J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Technology, 2022,38(3):346-355.
    [2] 龙花楼.论土地利用转型与土地资源管理[J].地理研究,2015,34(9):1607-1618.Long Hualou. Land use transition and land management [J]. Geographical Research, 2015,34(9):1607-1618.
    [3] Grainger A. National land use morphology: Patterns and possibilities [J]. Geography, 1995,80(3):235-245.
    [4] 董冬,罗毅,顾康康.“三生空间” 视角下长三角城市群土地利用转型生态环境效应时空分异及驱动力[J].长江流域资源与环境,2023,32(8):1664-1676.Dong Dong, Luo Yi, Gu Kangkang. Spatio-temporal differentiation and driving forces of eco-environmental effects of land use transformation in Yangtze River delta economic zone: A perspective of “production-living-ecological” spaces [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2023,32(8):1664-1676.
    [5] 杨清可,段学军,王磊,等.基于“三生空间” 的土地利用转型与生态环境效应: 以长江三角洲核心区为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(1):97-106.Yang Qingke, Duan Xuejun, Wang Lei, et al. Land use transformation based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects: A case study in the Yangtze River delta [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(1):97-106.
    [6] 黄鑫,程文仕,李晓丹,等.干旱内陆河流域土地利用转型的生态环境效应变化特征及其驱动因素探测[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(2):324-332.Huang Xin, Cheng Wenshi, Li Xiaodan, et al. Recognition on the changes and driving factors of eco-environmental effect of land use transformation in arid inland river basin [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(2):324-332.
    [7] 邓楚雄,彭勇,李科,等.基于生产—生态—生活空间多情景模拟下的流域土地利用转型及生态环境效应[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(8):2506-2516.Deng Chuxiong, Peng Yong, Li Ke, et al. Simulation of watershed land use transition and eco-environmental effects under multiple scenarios based on production-ecological-living space [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021,40(8):2506-2516.
    [8] 冯新惠,李艳,余迩,等.环太湖城市群土地利用转型及其生态环境效应[J].长江流域资源与环境,2023,32(6):1238-1253.Feng Xinhui, Li Yan, Yu Er, et al. Land use transition and associated eco-environmental effects in the Taihu Lake city cluster [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2023,32(6):1238-1253.
    [9] 韩美, 孔祥伦, 李云龙, 等. 黄河三角洲“三生”用地转型的生态环境效应及其空间分异机制[J]. 地理科学, 2021,41(6): 1009-1018.Han Mei,Kong Xianglun,Li Yunlong, et al. Eco-environmental effects and its spatial heterogeneity of ecological-production-living land use transformation in the Yellow River Delta. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021,41(6):1009-1018.
    [10] 黄晶,薛东前,董朝阳,等.干旱绿洲农业区土地利用转型生态环境效应及分异机制: 基于三生空间主导功能判别视角[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(11):2044-2060.Huang Jing, Xue Dongqian, Dong Chaoyang, et al. Eco-environmental effects and spatial differentiation mechanism of land use transition in agricultural areas of arid oasis: A perspective based on the dominant function of production-living-ecological spaces [J]. Progress in Geography, 2022,41(11):2044-2060.
    [11] 丁慧敏,杨朝现,李鑫,等.高原传统农区土地利用功能演变及其生态环境效应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(6):399-407.Ding Huimin, Yang Chaoxian, Li Xin, et al. Evolution of land use function and its ecological and environmental effects in traditional agricultural areas of the plateau [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(6):399-407.
    [12] 高星,刘泽伟,李晨曦,等.基于“三生空间” 的雄安新区土地利用功能转型与生态环境效应研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(20):7113-7122.Gao Xing, Liu Zewei, Li Chenxi, et al. Land use function transformation in the Xiong’an New Area based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(20):7113-7122.
    [13] 刘春艳,朱康文,刘吉平.三峡库区重庆段土地覆盖和生物多样性功能演化及预测[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(19):258-267.Liu Chunyan, Zhu Kangwen, Liu Jiping. Evolution and prediction of land cover and biodiversity function in Chongqing section of Three Gorges Reservoir Area [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017,33(19):258-267.
    [14] 李明珍,李阳兵,冉彩虹.土地利用转型背景下的乡村景观格局演变响应: 基于草堂溪流域的样带分析[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(9):2283-2298.Li Mingzhen, Li Yangbing, Ran Caihong. Evolution of rural landscape pattern under the background of land use transformation: Based on the transect analysis of Caotangxi watershed [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(9):2283-2298.
    [15] 畅田颖,张仲伍,乔旭宁,等.黄河流域2000—2020年“三生” 空间土地利用转型及其生态环境效应[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(4):268-275.Chang Tianying, Zhang Zhongwu, Qiao Xuning, et al. Land use transformation and its eco-environment effects of ecological-production-living spaces in Yellow River basin [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,41(4):268-275.
    [16] 江曼琦,刘勇.“三生” 空间内涵与空间范围的辨析[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(4):43-48.Jiang Manqi, Liu Yong. Discussion on the concept definition and spatial boundary classification of “production-living-ecological” space [J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020,27(4):43-48.
    [17] 刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞.中国“三生空间” 分类评价与时空格局分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(7):1290-1304.Liu Jilai, Liu Yansui, Li Yurui. Classification evaluation and spatial-temporal analysis of “production-living-ecological” spaces in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(7):1290-1304.
    [18] 黄安,许月卿,卢龙辉,等.“生产—生活—生态” 空间识别与优化研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(3):503-518.Huang An, Xu Yueqing, Lu Longhui, et al. Research progress of the identification and optimization of production-living-ecological spaces [J]. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(3):503-518.
    [19] 贲薛晨,余成.基于“三生空间” 的土地利用转型的生态效应及驱动力分析: 以苏州市为例[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(5):1428-1436.Ben Xuechen, Yu Cheng. Ecological effects of land use transformation and its driving force based on production-living-ecological space: A case study of Suzhou City [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022,12(5):1428-1436.
    [20] 龚亚男,韩书成,时晓标,等.广东省“三生空间” 用地转型的时空演变及其生态环境效应[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(3):203-209.Gong Yanan, Han Shucheng, Shi Xiaobiao, et al. Temporal and spatial evolution and associated eco-environment effects of the land use transformation of ecological-production-living spaces in Guangdong Province [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,27(3):203-209.
    [21] 陈竹安,冯祥瑞,洪志强,等.南昌市土地利用的空间冲突风险评估及分区优化研究: 基于“三生空间” 视角[J].世界地理研究,2021,30(3):533-545.Chen Zhu’an, Feng Xiangrui, Hong Zhiqiang, et al. Research on spatial conflict calculation and zoning optimization of land use in Nanchang City from the perspective of “three living spaces” [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021,30(3):533-545.
    [22] 陈万旭,李江风,曾杰,等.中国土地利用变化生态环境效应的空间分异性与形成机理[J].地理研究,2019,38(9):2173-2187.Chen Wanxu, Li Jiangfeng, Zeng Jie, et al. Spatial heterogeneity and formation mechanism of eco-environmental effect of land use change in China [J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(9):2173-2187.
    [23] 杨朔,郑晓筝,赵国平.关中平原城市群“三生” 空间生态环境效应及影响因素研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2023,37(9):26-35.Yang Shuo, Zheng Xiaozheng, Zhao Guoping. Spatial ecological effects of ecological-production-living spaces in the Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration and influencing factors [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023,37(9):26-35.
    [24] 孔冬艳,陈会广,吴孔森.中国“三生空间” 演变特征、生态环境效应及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(5):1116-1135.Kong Dongyan, Chen Huiguang, Wu Kongsen. The evolution of “production-living-ecological” space, eco-environmental effects and its influencing factors in China [J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2021,36(5):1116-1135.
    [25] 庄大方,刘纪远.中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究[J].自然资源学报,1997,12(2):105-111.Zhuang Dafang, Liu Jiyuan. Study on the model of regional differentiation of land use degree in China [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 1997,12(2):105-111.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

曾艳梅,苏旭阳,王明阳,文传浩.1990—2020年长江上游“三生”空间转型的生态环境效应及其空间分异机制[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(3):284-295

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:102
  • 下载次数: 245
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-15
  • 最后修改日期:2024-04-21
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-08-21