三峡库区农户参与水土保持的福利效应及其影响因素
作者:
中图分类号:

S157.1

基金项目:

教育部人文社科项目“三峡库区农户参与水土保持:福利效应、影响机制与提升路径研究”(21YJAZH093)


Welfare Effects and Factors Influencing Farmers’ Participation in Soil and Water Conservation Projects in Three Gorges Reservoir Area
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [28]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 开展农户参与水土保持的福利效应评价,为区域水土保持可持续发展提供理论支持。[方法] 以三峡库区水土保持项目区县为例,运用可行能力理论构建了福利评价指标体系,通过倾向得分匹配法、模糊综合评价法和分位数回归法探究农户参与水土保持的福利效应。[结果] ①农户参与水土保持后,耕作环境和居住环境福利指数分别提升了0.523和0.614,农户的居民幸福指数水平较高,收入满意度等主观福利指数均分布在0.5以上。②参与水土保持的农户与未参与水土保持的农户的福利状况存在明显差异,参与农户的福利总模糊指数大于未参与农户。③水土保持项目从经济、社会和生态等方面综合提升农户的福利水平,福利效应为2.75%~2.80%。④农户参与水土保持的程度越高,福利水平越好;农户自发水土保持行为产生的总福利大于政府引导水土保持产生的总福利,对于产量和耕作环境福利方面政府引导产生的福利更显著,耕地面积是影响农户参与水土保持福利状况的主要因素。[结论] 研究区应加强对水土保持技术的推广和培训,实施水土保持措施时需考虑地区特性,从而提高农户的水土保持参与度,确保更多农户从水土保持中获益。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To assess how farmers’ participation in soil conservation programs affects their welfare, to provide theoretical support for the sustainable development of regional soil conservation. [Methods] We selected counties involved in soil and water conservation projects within the Three Gorges Reservoir area and constructed a welfare evaluation index system based on capability theory. We explored how farmers’ participation in such projects affects their welfare using methods including propensity score matching, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and quantile regression. [Results] ① After participating in soil and water conservation programs, the welfare indices of the farming and living environments were 0.523 and 0.614, respectively. The happiness index of resident farmers was high, and subjective well-being indices, such as income satisfaction, were above 0.5. ② A marked difference in welfare outcomes was identified between farmers that participated in soil and water conservation and those who did not, with the total fuzzy welfare index of participating farmers being greater than that of non-participating farmers. ③ Soil conservation projects comprehensively improved the welfare level of farmers from economic, social and ecological perspectives, with a welfare effect of 2.75%—2.80%. ④ The overall welfare level of farmers’ families increased with an increasing extent of their participation in soil and water conservation projects. The total welfare generated by farmers’ spontaneous soil conservation behaviours was greater than that generated by government-guided soil and water conservation initiatives, although government-guided welfare was more significant in terms of crop yield and farming environments. Cultivated land area was the main factor affecting farmers’ participation in soil conservation welfare. [Conclusion] The promotion and training of soil conservation interventions should be strengthened, and regional characteristics should be considered when implementing soil and water conservation measures, so as to improve farmers’ participation in such projects and ensure that more farmers benefit from these conservation measures.

    参考文献
    [1] 洪兰,韦杰,李进林,等.三峡库区水土保持工程农户参与行为调查[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(2):244-249. Hong Lan, Wei Jie, Li Jinlin, et al. Investigation on farmer participation behavior in soil conservation projects in Three Gorges Reservoir area [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016,36(2):244-249.
    [2] 蒋碧瑶,史兴民,秦语晗.水土保持增加了沙漠—黄土过渡带农户福祉吗?基于PSM的实证研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2023,37(4):37-44. Jiang Biyao, Shi Xingmin, Qin Yuhan. Does soil and water conservation increase the farmer’s well-being in desert-loess transition zone? [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023,37(4):37-44.
    [3] Ogunniyi A I, Omotayo A O, Olagunju K O, et al. Do soil and water conservation practices influence crop productivity and household welfare? Evidence from rural Nigeria [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2023,30(19):56016-56036.
    [4] 张立靖,李弘毅,鱼海霞,等.安定区水土保持与经济增长及减贫关系分析[J].中国水土保持,2023,(04):42-44. Zhang Lijing, Li Hongyi, Yu Haixia. The relationship between soil and water conservation and economic grouth and local poverty reduction in Anding district[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China,2023,(4):42-44.
    [5] 李小建.还原论与农户地理研究[J].地理研究,2010,29(5):767-777. Li Xiaojian. Reductionism and geography of rural households [J]. Geographical Research, 2010,29(5):767-777.
    [6] Hörner D, Wollni M. Integrated soil fertility management and household welfare in Ethiopia [J]. Food Policy, 2021,100:102022.
    [7] Choudhary B, Dev I, Singh P, et al. Impact of soil and water conservation measures on farm productivity and income in the semi-arid tropics of Bundelkhand, central India [J]. Environmental Conservation, 2022,49:263-271.
    [8] 邱坚坚,刘毅华,袁利,等.人地系统耦合下生态系统服务与人类福祉关系研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(6):1060-1072. Qiu Jianjian, Liu Yihua, Yuan Li, et al. Research progress and prospect of the interrelationship between ecosystem services and human well-being in the context of coupled human and natural system [J]. Progress in Geography, 2021,40(6):1060-1072.
    [9] 王一鸣,高鹏,穆兴民,等.南方红壤丘陵区小流域水土保持综合效益评价: 以江西阳坑小流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(5):6-13. Wang Yiming, Gao Peng, Mu Xingmin, et al. Assessment on comprehensive benefit of soil and water conservation in the small watershed of the southern red soil hilly region: A case study in Yangkeng small watershed in Jingxi Province [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,24(5):6-13.
    [10] 张旭锐,高建中.农户新一轮退耕还林的福利效应研究: 基于陕南退耕还林区的实证分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(2):14-20. Zhang Xurui, Gao Jianzhong. A study on the welfare effect of farmers’ new round of returning farmland to forest in Southern Shaanxi [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021,35(2):14-20.
    [11] 李嘉成,董捷.林农参与林业碳汇项目行为及福利效应研究: 基于社会资本异质性的视角[J].林业经济,2021,43(6):21-34. Li Jiacheng, Dong Jie. Research on farmers’ participation in forestry carbon sink project behavior and welfare effects: Based on the perspective of social capital heterogeneity [J]. Forestry Economics, 2021,43(6):21-34.
    [12] 丁屹红,姚顺波.退耕还林工程对农户福祉影响比较分析: 基于6个省951户农户调查为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(5):45-50. Ding Yihong, Yao Shunbo. A comparative analysis of the impacts of the sloping land conversion program on the well-being of households in the Yellow and Yangtze River Basins [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017,31(5):45-50.
    [13] 蔡荣,汪紫钰,刘婷.节水灌溉技术采用及其增产效应评估: 以延津县318户胡萝卜种植户为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(12):166-175. Cai Rong, Wang Ziyu, Liu Ting. Impact of drip irrigation technique on agricultural yield: Evidence from 318 carrot producers in Yanjin County [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2018,23(12):166-175.
    [14] 刘丽,褚力其,姜志德.技术认知、风险感知对黄土高原农户水土保持耕作技术采用意愿的影响及代际差异[J].资源科学,2020,42(4):763-775. Liu Li, Chu Liqi, Jiang Zhide. Influence of technology cognition and risk perception on the willingness to adopt soil and water conservation tillage technologies and its intergenerational differences [J]. Resources Science, 2020,42(4):763-775.
    [15] 王兆林,鄂施璇,陈军利.近40年来三峡库区农村人口与居民点用地演变脱钩及驱动效应分析[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(13):273-284. Wang Zhaolin, E Shixuan, Chen Junli. Decoupling of rural population and settlement in the Three Gorges Reservoir areas in the past 40 years and its driving effect [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022,38(13):273-284.
    [16] 陈茂林,官冬杰,孙灵丽.三峡库区农户生计变化与土地利用功能空间冲突类型识别[J].资源开发与市场,2023,39(1):69-77. Chen Maolin, Guan Dongjie, Sun Lingli. Identification of spatial conflict type between household livelihood change and land use function in the Three Gorges Reservoir area [J]. Resource Development & Market, 2023,39(1):69-77.
    [17] 胡清华,伍国勇,宋珂,等.农村土地征收对被征地农户福利的影响评价:基于阿马蒂亚·森的可行能力理论[J].经济地理,2019,39(12):187-194. Hu Qinghua, Wu Guoyong, Song Ke, et al. Evaluation of the impact of rural land expropriation on land-expropriated farmers’ welfare by means of amartya Sen’s theory of capability [J]. Economic Geography, 2019,39(12):187-194.
    [18] 高博发,李聪,李树茁,等.生态脆弱地区易地扶贫搬迁农户福利状况及影响因素研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(8):88-95. Gao Bofa, Li Cong, Li Shuzhuo, et al. Welfare status and the influencing factors for anti-poverty relocated households in ecologically fragile area [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020,34(8):88-95.
    [19] 王珊,张安录,张叶生.农地城市流转的农户福利效应测度[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(3):108-115. Wang Shan, Zhang Anlu, Zhang Yesheng. Measurement of household welfare change in the process of rural-urban land conversion [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014,24(3):108-115.
    [20] 陈飞,翟伟娟.农户行为视角下农地流转诱因及其福利效应研究[J].经济研究,2015,50(10):163-177. Chen Fei, Zhai Weijuan. Land transfer incentive and welfare effect research from perspective of farmers’ behavior [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015,50(10):163-177.
    [21] 许恒周,牛坤在,王大哲.农地确权的收入效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(10):165-173. Xu Hengzhou, Niu Kunzai, Wang Dazhe. Income effect of farmland rights confirmation [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020,30(10):165-173.
    [22] 占鹏,朱俊峰.农户土地流转经济福利效应的多维度分析: 基于多重选择处理效应模型[J].中国农业大学学报,2022,27(1):248-258. Zhan Peng, Zhu Junfeng. Multi-scale study on the welfare effect of farmers’ land transfer: Based on multi-valued treatment effect model [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2022,27(1):248-258.
    [23] 王敏,韦杰,唐强,等.农户参与水土保持的福利效应:概念、内涵与评价指标框架[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(6):256-262. Wang Min, Wei Jie, Tang Qiang, et al. Welfare effect of farmers’ participation in soil conservation: Concept, connotation and evaluation index framework [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,43(6):256-262.
    [24] 葛颖,徐崇森,李坦.农户视角下耕地生态服务保护补偿意愿研究[J].云南农业大学学报(社会科学),2020,14(5):104-111. Ge Ying, Xu Chongsen, Li Tan. The compensation willingness of cultivated land ecological service protection from the perspective of farmers [J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2020,14(5):104-111.
    [25] 李倩,石磊,高甲荣,等.火烧沟“参与式” 小流域治理的满意度分析[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(5):120-125. Li Qian, Shi Lei, Gao Jiarong, et al. Analysis on satisfaction of participatory management in Huoshaogou watershed [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,24(5):120-125.
    [26] Oduniyi O S, Chagwiza C, Wade T. Welfare impacts of conservation agriculture adoption on smallholder maize farmers in South Africa [J]. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems,2022,37(6):672-682.
    [27] Tabe-Ojong M P, Ibarra L M, Andrade R S, et al. Soil conservation and smallholder welfare under cassava-based systems in Thailand [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2023,34(6):1795-1805.
    [28] Si Ruishi, Lu Qian, Aziz N. Does the stability of farmland rental contract & conservation tillage adoption improve family welfare? Empirical insights from Zhangye, China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2021,107:105486.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王敏,韦杰,李进林,贺秀斌.三峡库区农户参与水土保持的福利效应及其影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(4):405-415

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:57
  • 下载次数: 325
  • HTML阅读次数: 234
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-15
  • 最后修改日期:2024-04-19
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-09-04