不同土地利用方式下土壤团聚体及其碳氮含量差异性分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.杭州师范大学工学院;2.浙江恒美环保科技有限公司;3.、浙江恒美环保科技有限公司

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157

基金项目:


Effect of Land Use Type on Stability and Microbial entropy of Soil Aggregates
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]研究浙东典型森林公园地区土壤中的生物群落和有机质的变化,为改善该地区的土壤结构和提高土壤有机质含量奠定基础。[方法]在浙东典型天童国家森林公园选择林地、果园、蔬菜和荒地这4种土地利用方式,通过湿筛法测定大团聚体(>2 mm)>中间团聚体(0.25-2 mm)>微团聚体(0.053-0.25 mm)>粉黏粒(<0.053 mm)有机碳含量和微生物量碳、氮含量,揭示浙东典型森林公园地区土壤有机碳库的形成格局和调控。[结果]①不同土地利用模式下各个粒级的团聚体有机碳和微生物量碳、氮的分配规律相似,均表现为中间团聚体>微团聚体>大团聚体>粉黏粒;不同土地利用方式下0-10 cm土壤平均重量直径(MWD)和几何平均直径(GMD)均高于10-20 cm土层,0-10 cm和10-20 cm土壤MWD和GMD大致表现为林地>荒地>果园>蔬菜,其中林地和荒地差异不显著(p>0.05),果园和蔬菜差异不显著(p>0.05),由此说明不同土地利用方式对土壤团聚体稳定性的影响主要在表层土壤。②不同土地利用方式下土壤各粒径有机碳含量趋势一致,基本表现为:大团聚体>中间团聚体>微团聚体>粉黏粒,且0-10 cm土层土壤各粒径有机碳含量均高于10-20 cm土层,0-10 cm和10-20 cm土壤有机碳含量大致表现为林地>荒地>果园>蔬菜,其中林地和荒地显著高于果园和蔬菜(p<0.05),果园和蔬菜差异不显著(p>0.05)。③不同土地利用方式下土壤各粒径微生物量碳和氮变化趋势一致,基本表现为:大团聚体>中间团聚体>微团聚体>粉黏粒,且0-10 cm土层土壤微生物量碳和氮含量均高于10-20 cm土层,0-10 cm和10-20 cm土壤微生物量碳和氮含量大致表现为林地>荒地>果园>蔬菜,其中林地和荒地显著高于果园和蔬菜(p<0.05),果园和蔬菜差异不显著(p>0.05)。[结论]林地和荒地团聚体有机碳、微生物量碳和氮高于果园和蔬菜地,由此表明林地和荒地更有利于土壤有机碳的累积,能够促进土壤固碳。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The changes of soil biomes and organic matter in typical forest park area of eastern Zhejiang were studied to lay a foundation for improving soil structure and increasing soil organic matter content in this area. [Methods] The forest land, orchard, vegetable and wasteland land utilization way, by wet sieving method big aggregate (> 2 mm) > middle aggregate (0.25-2 mm) > micro aggregate (0.053-0.25 mm) > powder clay (< 0.053 mm) in the content of organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content, the influence of soil aggregate stability and microbes will provide a scientific basis for the optimization of the management. [Results] ①The results showed that the distribution trend of the components of the aggregates of different soil particle sizes was consistent under different land use patterns. 0 to 10 cm soil under different land use ways mean weight diameter (MWDS) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) were higher than 10-20 cm soil layer, 0 to 10 cm and 10-20 cm soil MWDS and GMD roughly characterized by forest land > wasteland > orchard > vegetables, forest land and wasteland of no significant difference (p > 0.05), orchards and vegetable no significant difference (p > 0.05), illustrate that different ways of land use on soil aggregate stability influence mainly in the surface soil. ② Soils under different land use ways each grain size trends of organic carbon content is consistent, basic performance is: the big aggregate > middle aggregate > micro aggregate > powder clay, and 0 to 10 cm soil layer soil of each particle size distribution of organic carbon content were higher than 10-20 cm soil layer, 0 to 10 cm and roughly 10-20 cm soil organic carbon content of forest land > wasteland > orchard > vegetables, significantly higher than that of forest land and wasteland orchards and vegetable (p < 0.05), orchards and vegetable no significant difference (p > 0.05). ③ Soils under different land use modes of each particle size of microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen variation trend is consistent, basic performance is: the big aggregate > middle aggregate > micro aggregate > powder clay, and 0 to 10 cm soil layer soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content were higher than 10-20 cm soil layer, 0 to 10 cm and 10-20 cm soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content is generally characterized by forest land > wasteland > orchard > vegetables, significantly higher than that of forest land and wasteland orchards and vegetable (p < 0.05), orchards and vegetable no significant difference (p > 0.05) . [Conclusion] On the whole, the organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen of the forest land and wasteland aggregate were higher than that of the orchard and vegetable land, indicating that the forest land and wasteland were more conducive to the accumulation of soil organic carbon and could promote soil carbon sequestration.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-11
  • 最后修改日期:2024-09-14
  • 录用日期:2024-09-14
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: