水土保持政策与农业生态效率耦合协调关系及其驱动因素
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S-01

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目:长江上游生态大保护政策可持续性与机制构建研究(20&ZD096)


Coupling coordination relationship between soil and water conservation policy and agricultural eco-efficiency and its driving factors
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Major projects of National Social Science Foundation of China:Study on the sustainability of ecological protection policy and its mechanism construction in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]探究水土保持政策与农业生态效率耦合协调关系及其驱动要素,有利于在政策引导下促进农业领域经济与资源环境的和谐共生。[方法]以三峡库区(重庆段)作为研究区,建立水土保持政策强度与农业生态效率评价指标体系,运用耦合协调度模型、地理探测器模型以及OLS回归分析了2015—2022年区域内水土保持政策与农业生态效率耦合关系及其驱动机制。[结果]①三峡库区(重庆段)内部各区域在政策强度与生态效率方面存在显著差异,方山丘陵保土人居环境维护区和平行岭谷保土人居环境维护区在政策实施上表现出较强的增长势头,而其余区域则相对平稳;都市山水人居环境维护区农业生态效率表现优异,武陵山山地水源涵养保土区则相对较低,呈现出明显的两极分化趋势。②水土保持政策与农业生态效率之间的耦合协调度整体呈现上升趋势,都市山水人居环境维护区和方山丘陵保土人居环境维护区的协调程度尤为突出。然而,渝中平行岭谷保土人居环境维护区中的开州区则存在显著的失调现象。③驱动机制结果表明农田水利设施投入有助于提升两者协调水平,合理控制播种面积也可以更积极地影响水土保持政策与农业生态效率之间的协调关系,经过反事实检验也进一步证实其回归结果的稳健性。[结论]三峡库区(重庆段)为有效维护水土资源和农业生态安全,应坚持因地治理、区域联动的原则,积极引导社会各方参与形成治理合力,共同推动扶贫、保土、助农相结合的多元化帮扶模式发展。

    Abstract:

    [ Objective ] Exploring the coupling and coordination relationship between soil and water conservation policy and agricultural eco-efficiency and its driving factors is conducive to promoting the harmonious coexistence of economy, resources and environment in the agricultural field under the guidance of policy. [ Methods ] Taking the Three Gorges Reservoir Area ( Chongqing section ) as the research area, the evaluation index system of soil and water conservation policy intensity and agricultural eco-efficiency was established. The coupling coordination degree model, geographical detector model and OLS regression were used to analyze the coupling relationship between soil and water conservation policy and agricultural eco-efficiency and its driving mechanism in the region from 2015 to 2022. [ Results ] ① There were significant differences in policy intensity and ecological efficiency among the regions in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area ( Chongqing section ). The maintenance area of soil-conserving human settlements in Fangshan Hills and the maintenance area of soil-conserving human settlements in parallel ridges and valleys showed a strong growth momentum in policy implementation, while the rest of the region was relatively stable. The agricultural ecological efficiency of the urban landscape living environment maintenance area is excellent, while that of the Wuling Mountain water conservation and soil conservation area is relatively low, showing an obvious polarization trend. ②The coupling coordination degree between soil and water conservation policies and agricultural ecological efficiency showed an overall upward trend, and the coordination degree of urban landscape human settlement environment maintenance area and Fangshan hilly soil conservation human settlement environment maintenance area was particularly prominent. However, there is a significant imbalance in Kaizhou District in the area of soil conservation and human settlements in the parallel ridge valley of Yuzhong.③The results of the driving mechanism show that the input of farmland water conservancy facilities is helpful to improve the coordination level between the two, and the reasonable control of the planting area can also more positively affect the coordination relationship between the soil and water conservation policy and the agricultural ecological efficiency. The robustness of the regression results is further confirmed by the counterfactual test. [ Conclusion ] In order to effectively maintain water and soil resources and agricultural ecological security, the Three Gorges Reservoir Area ( Chongqing section ) should adhere to the principle of local governance and regional linkage, actively guide all parties in society to participate in the formation of governance synergy, and jointly promote the development of a diversified support model combining poverty alleviation, soil conservation and agricultural assistance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-13
  • 最后修改日期:2024-10-27
  • 录用日期:2024-10-28
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: