首批国家公园产水能力时空格局及驱动力差异
作者单位:

甘肃农业大学

基金项目:

甘肃省教育厅高校科研创新平台重大培育项目(2024CXPT-07);草业生态系统教育部重点实验室揭榜挂帅项目(KLGE-2024-06)


The Spatiotemporal Patterns of Water Yield Capacity and Differences in Driving Forces of the First Batch of National Parks
Fund Project:

Key Cultivation Project of University Research Innovation Platform of Gansu Provincial Department of Education, No. 2024CXPT-07; Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem of Ministry of Education .NO.KLGE-2024-06

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]通过对我国首批5个国家公园产水能力的对比分析,探索各公园关键驱动力,为优化国家公园生态保护及水资源管理提供科学依据。[方法]基于InVEST模型评估2000–2023年各国家公园的产水能力,结合变异系数分析产水能力的稳定性,采用偏最小二乘路径模型(PLS-PM)定量探讨各公园关键驱动力的作用机制。[结果] 1)2000-2023年,首批国家公园的产水深度普遍呈波动上升趋势(除海南热带雨林国家公园)。其中,武夷山国家公园的产水深度(1609.13 mm)和增幅(k=9.34)均最大;三江源国家公园的产水深度(133.89 mm)较小,且增幅(k=0.95)最为平缓。2)各公园产水能力的稳定性为:三江源国家公园 > 海南热带雨林国家公园 > 大熊猫国家公园 > 武夷山国家公园 > 东北虎豹国家公园。3)不同公园的关键驱动力差异明显,表现出不同的影响模式。降水量是影响产水能力的主要正向因素,且三江源(0.9879)和海南热带雨林国家公园(0.8328)显著高于其他公园;潜在蒸散发对产水深度的影响普遍为负相关,在大熊猫(-0.4581)和武夷山国家公园(-0.3485)中表现尤为显著;植被覆盖度和地形因子的影响则在不同国家公园中存在差异。[结论] 2000-2023年我国首批5个国家公园产水能力时空格局变化明显且稳定性较高,其关键驱动力各有差异且空间异质性明显。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Through the comparative analysis of water yielding capacity of the first five national parks in China, to explore the key driving force of each park, and to provide scientific basis for optimizing the ecological protection and water resource management of national parks. [Methods] Based on the InVEST model, we assessed the water yielding capacity of each national park from 2000 to 2023, combined with the coefficient of variation to analyze the stability of the water yielding capacity, and used the Partial Least Squares Path Model (PLS-PM) to quantitatively explore the functioning mechanism of the key driving force of each park. [Results] 1) From 2000 to 2023, the depth of water yield in the first national parks generally showed a fluctuating upward trend (except Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park). Among them, Wuyishan National Park has the largest depth of water yield (1609.13 mm) and the largest increase (k=9.34), while Sanjiangyuan National Park has the smaller depth of water yield (133.89 mm) and the most moderate increase (k=0.95). 2) The stability of the water yield of each park is as follows: Sanjiangyuan National Park > Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park > Giant Panda National Park > Wuyishan National Park > Northeastern Tiger and Leopard National Park. Park > Northeast Tiger and Leopard National Park. 3) The key driving forces of different parks differed significantly, showing different patterns of influence. Precipitation is the main positive factor affecting water yield, and it is significantly higher in Sanjiangyuan (0.9879) and Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park (0.8328) than in the other parks; potential evapotranspiration is generally negatively correlated with the depth of water yield, which is particularly significant in the Giant Panda (-0.4581) and Wuyishan National Park (-0.3485); and the impacts of vegetation cover and topography differ in different national parks. varied among different national parks. [Conclusions] The spatial and temporal patterns of water yield capacity in the first five national parks in China from 2000 to 2023 are obvious and stable, and their key driving forces are different and spatially heterogeneous.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-04
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-17
  • 录用日期:2025-03-18