宁夏中部干旱带植被NPP对干旱变化的响应
作者:
作者单位:

1.宁夏大学林业与草业学院;2.宁夏大学地理科学与规划学院;3.宁夏大学生态环境学院

中图分类号:

S423

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金联合基金项目:宁夏中部干旱带典型固沙植物高效抚育利用的水力调控机理(U23A20223)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要:[目的]气象干旱是植被NPP变化的主要驱动因素。为探究植被对干旱的响应机理,明确干旱时空演变特征及其对植被NPP的负面影响。[方法]本研究以宁夏中部干旱带2001–2021年标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI)度量气象干旱,基于MODIS遥感数据,采用CASA模型估算研究区NPP,采用趋势分析及Mann-Kendall检验、Pearson相关性分析等方法分析不同植被类型NPP因干旱损失量(?NPP)的时空分异及其与SPEI指数的相关性。[结果]结果表明:(1)2001-2021年间,SPEI指数显示,研究区干旱趋势整体趋缓;空间尺度上总体仍以干旱占主导,但局地有湿润化趋势;(2)研究区植被?NPP整体上呈出波动减少趋势;在空间上研究区东部植被?NPP呈减小趋势;(3)SPEI指数与?NPP的相关性分析显示,呈正相关占主导,但因干旱等级不同存在呈明显的时空差异。(4)不同植被类型?NPP对年尺度SPEI的响应具有一定差异,具体表现为:在严重和极端干旱胁迫下,林地的?NPP最大,农作物次之,灌木最小。[结论]总体来说,目前宁夏中部干旱带出现湿润化趋势,为提高研究区植被对干旱的抵抗力,需提高植被结构与组成的复杂性和多样性。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective]To explore the response mechanism of vegetation to drought, identify the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of drought and its negative impact on vegetation NPP.[Method]Drought characteristics was quantified by Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) , and NPPwas estimated based on MODIS remote sensing data by Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach (CASA) model and annual SPEI index during 2001 to 2020 in the middle arid zone of Ningxia was calculated to explore the response characteristics and differences of NPP of different vegetation types to SPEI, and the correlation between NPP loss due to drought(?NPP) and SPEI index by using the methods of trend analysis, Mann-Kendall test and correlation analysis. [Result]The results showed that: (1) during 2001 to 2020, the SPEI index indicated that the drought trend in the study area was generally slowing down , drought was still dominant on spatial scale, but there was a trend of humidification. (2) ?NPPin the study area showed a totally decreasing trend of fluctuation; spatially, the ?NPP in the eastern part of the study area decreased significantly. (3) The correlation analysis between SPEI index and ?NPP showed that the positive correlation was dominant, but there were obvious spatial-temporal differences due to different drought grades. (4) The response of ?NPP of different vegetation types to annual SPEI was different , under severe and extreme drought stresses, the NPP loss of forest was the largest, followed by crop, and shrubs was the least. [Conclusion]In general, drought was the main factor restricting the growth of NPP in the study area. In order to improve the resistance of vegetation to drought in the study area, the complexity and diversity of vegetation structure and composition should be improved.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-16
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-15
  • 录用日期:2025-03-17