不同改良剂对秦巴山区新造耕地土壤质量提升效果的比较研究
作者单位:

1.西北农林科技大学;2.汉滨区农业农村局

中图分类号:

S156.92

基金项目:

安康市科学技术研究发展计划项目,国家重点研发计划项目


The Comparative Study on the Effect of Different Amendments on Enhancing Soil Quality in Newly-created Farmland in the Qinba Mountain Area
Fund Project:

Ankang Science and Technology Research and Development Plan Project, National Key Research and Development Plan Project

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]针对秦巴山区新造耕地土壤质地粘重、养分缺乏和土壤生物活性低等问题,分析不同改良剂对秦巴山区新造耕地土壤质量提升的效果,为新造耕地土壤质量快速提升和恢复生产提供理论依据和技术支持。[方法]通过两年田间试验,设置对照(CT)、硫酸亚铁(T1)、生物炭(T2)、微生物菌剂(T3)和复合处理(T4)五个处理,从玉米产量、土壤物理结构、化学性质、土壤酶活性四个方面探究不同改良剂对新造耕地土壤质量和玉米产量提升的效果。[结果]相比于CT,T2、T3、T4处理的玉米产量分别增加了17.31 %、30.57 %和25.89 %。五个处理的土壤质量指数顺序为T4>T2>T3>T1>CT。T2和T4处理的土壤pH、容重、有机质、全氮和碱解氮含量均接近秦巴山区优等耕地水平,同时,T1处理的土壤容重和T3处理的土壤pH以及容重也接近优等耕地水平。相关分析表明,土壤有机质含量是影响土壤物理性质、养分含量和土壤酶活性的关键因素,而土壤微生物活性低可能是限制新造耕地产量提升的主要因素。[结论]基于新造耕地土壤质量提升角度,生物炭和复合处理可作为该地区的重要改良手段;而若考虑成本和产量提升,可选择微生物菌剂作为该地区主要改良措施。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Aiming at the problems of heavy soil texture, lack of nutrients and low soil biological activity of newly-created farmland in Qinba mountain area, the effects of different modifiers on the improvement of soil quality of newly cultivated land in Qinba mountain area were analyzed, so as to provide theoretical basis and technical support for the rapid improvement of soil quality of newly-created farmland and the restoration of production. [Methods] A two-year field experiment was conducted with five treatments: Control (CT), ferrous sulfate (T1), biochar (T2), microbial inoculant (T3), and composite amendment (T4). The effects of these treatments on soil quality and maize yield were evaluated across four dimensions: maize yield, soil physical structure, chemical properties, and soil enzyme activity. [Results] Compared to CT, maize yields increased by 17.31 %, 30.57 %, and 25.89 % under T2, T3, and T4 treatments, respectively. The ranking of the soil quality index for each treatment is as follows: T4 > T2 > T3 > T1 > CT. Both T2 and T4 treatments attained soil pH, bulk density, organic matter, total nitrogen, and alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen levels that are on par with those found in high-quality cultivated land in the Qinba Mountain area. T1 improved soil bulk density to near-optimal levels, while T3 enhanced soil pH and bulk density. Correlation analysis indicated that soil organic matter was the key factor influencing soil physical properties, nutrient content, and enzyme activity, whereas low microbial activity was identified as the primary constraint on yield improvement in newly-created farmland. [Conclusion] For comprehensive soil quality enhancement, biochar (T2) and composite amendment (T4) are recommended as key technologies. However, when considering cost-effectiveness and yield improvement, microbial inoculant (T3) proves to be a practical and efficient measure for widespread application in the region.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-14
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-19
  • 录用日期:2025-03-20