黄河流域陕西段脆弱生态区砂质坡面有效植被盖度研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1. 长安大学 水利与环境学院,陕西西安 710054;2. 旱区地下水与生态效应教育部重点实验室,陕西西安 710054;3. 水利部旱区生态水文与水安全重点实验室,陕西西安 710054;4. 陕西地矿自然资源投资建设有限公司,陕西西安,710054;5. 汇金科技控股集团有限公司,陕西西安,710000;6.6. 甘肃省水利水电勘测设计研究院有限责任公司,甘肃兰州 730030

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

P641

基金项目:

陕西省重点研发计划项目(2022ZDLSF06-10,2023-ZDLSF-61,2024SF-ZDCYL-05-08);西安市科技计划-中青年科技创新领军人才项目(25ZQRC00023);中央高校高新技术研究支持计划(300102294204)


Study on the Effective Vegetation Cover of Sandy Slopes in the Fragile Ecological Zone of the Shaanxi Reach of the Yellow River Basin
Author:
Affiliation:

1. School of Water and Environment, Chang'2.'3.an University, Xi'4.an Shaanxi,710054,China;5.2. Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecological Effect in Arid Region of the Ministry of Education, Chang'6.an Shaanxi,710054, China;7.3. Key Laboratory of Eco-hydrology and Water Security in Arid and Semi-arid Regions of Ministry of Water Resources,Chang'

Fund Project:

Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (2022ZDLSF06-10, 2023-ZDLSF-61, 2024SF-ZDCYL-05-08); Xi'an Science and Technology Plan - Project for Leading Talents in Science and Technology Innovation of Middle-aged and Young People (25ZQRC00023); High-tech Research Support Program of Central Universities (300102294204)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的]研究黄河流域陕西段生态脆弱区砂质坡面侵蚀规律,确定砂质坡面侵蚀控制的有效植被盖度,为矿山生态修复与水土保持提供理论参考和数据支撑。[方法]本文采用野外调查、原位监测与数值模拟相结合的方法,在陕西省渭南市合阳县洽川镇申东砂场建设了三种坡度、四种坡长、三种植被情况,共计12个大区,48个野外径流小区;构建了研究区砂质坡面土壤水力侵蚀预测模型(Water Erosion Prediction Project, WEPP);模拟了研究区砂质坡面侵蚀规律;以产沙量减少系数增量()突变为依据,确定了砂质坡面土壤侵蚀控制的有效植被盖度。[结果]①基于野外原位监测数据,构建了研究区砂质坡面土壤侵蚀WEPP模型,对WEPP模型的参数进行了率定,获得了模型相关参数。②基于所建的WEPP模型和所获的参数,对砂质坡面侵蚀模拟表明,砂质坡面侵蚀存在临界雨强,在不同降雨、坡度、坡长时临界雨强不同。当雨强大于临界雨强时,相同雨强下砂质坡面径流量与产沙量顺序为日降雨量70mm>50mm>30mm。砂质坡面径流量顺序为:坡度25°>15°>35°,坡长24.4m>12.2m>30.0m;砂质坡面产沙量顺序为:坡度35°>25°>15°,当最大雨强(Maximum Precipitation Intensity,PImax)<45mm/h时,坡长24.4m>30.0m>12.2m;当PImax>45mm/h时,坡长30.0m>24.4m>12.2m。③数值模拟表明,以10%为依据,当坡度为15°和25°,控制砂质坡面侵蚀的有效植被盖度为20%~30%;当坡度为35°,其有效植被盖度为30%~40%。[结论]研究表明,黄河流域陕西段砂质坡面侵蚀存在临界雨强,分析了不同坡度、坡长、降雨与植被盖度下砂质坡面侵蚀规律,确定了不同坡度砂质坡面侵蚀控制的有效植被盖度,上述研究结果为黄河流域生态脆弱矿区生态修复与水土保持措施优化提供了依据和示范。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To study the erosion laws of sandy slopes in the ecologically fragile areas of the Yellow River Basin in Shaanxi Province, determine the effective vegetation coverage to control erosion on sandy slope angles, and provide theoretical references and data support for ecological restoration and soil and water conservation of mines. [Method] By means of combination of field investigation, in-situ monitoring and numerical simulation, 12 large areas and 48 field runoff plots with three slope angles, four slope lengths and three vegetation conditions were established in Shendong sand mining site, Hechuan Town, Heyang County, Weinan City, Shaanxi Province. The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) for the sandy slope soils was constructed, and the erosion laws of the sandy slopes in the study area were simulated. Based on mutation of the increment of erosion reduction coefficient(), the effective vegetation coverage for erosion control of sandy slopes was determined. [Result] ① Based on the field in-situ monitoring data, the WEPP for sandy slope soil erosion in the study area was constructed, and the parameters of the WEPP were calibrated, obtaining the relevant parameters. ② Based on the established WEPP and the obtained parameters, the simulation of sandy slope erosion showed that there was a critical precipitation intensity (CPI), different under different precipitation, slope angles and slope lengths. When the precipitation intensity was greater than CPI, the order of runoff and sediment yield of sandy slopes under the same precipitation intensity was 70mm > 50mm > 30mm for daily precipitation; the order of runoff was 25° > 15° > 35° for slope angles, and 24.4m > 12.2m > 30.0m for slope lengths. The order of sediment yield was 35° > 25° > 15° for slope angles; if Maximum Precipitation Intensity(PImax) < 45mm/h, its order was 24.4m > 30.0m > 12.2m for slope length; if PImax > 45mm/h, its order was 30.0m > 24.4m > 12.2m. ③ Based on with 10%, the simulation showed that when the slope angle was 15° and 25°, the effective vegetation coverage to control sandy slope erosion was 20%~30%; when the slope angle was 35°, its effective vegetation coverage was 30%~40%. [Conclusion] The researches show that there is a CPI for sandy slope erosion in the Shaanxi section of the Yellow River Basin. The erosion laws of sandy slopes under different slope angles, slope lengths, precipitation and vegetation coverage were analyzed, and the effective vegetation coverage to control sandy slope erosion under different slope angles was determined. The above research results provide a basis and demonstration for the optimization of ecological restoration and soil and water conservation measures in ecologically fragile mining areas in the Yellow River Basin.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-26
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-21
  • 录用日期:2025-12-24
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: