川西南农村山洪韧性与生态调节服务的协调关系
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X22,X43,X171.1

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“横断山区高频高强自然灾害扰动的农村居民生计恢复力响应与靶向调校研究”(42171209),“川西少数民族农户减贫阻滞机制与脱贫行为研究”(41671152)


Coordination relationship between flash flood resilience and ecosystem regulation services in rural areas of southwestern Sichuan Province
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的]将农村山洪韧性与生态系统调节服务置于统一框架下,探索二者耦合协调关系的时空演变规律,为山区农村可持续发展与防灾减灾决策提供支撑。[方法]以山洪高发且生态地位关键的川西南为研究区,采用“压力-状态-响应”(PSR)模型构建农村山洪韧性评估体系,并运用修正通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)和水量平衡方程测算土壤保持及水源涵养服务量,利用耦合协调度模型定量解析两系统协调关系。[结果]①2013—2023年农村山洪韧性水平由0.343提升至0.471,空间上呈现稳定的“北高南低”格局。②生态调节服务与水热格局相匹配,同时受气候波动影响,呈非线性变化,具有明显的地域分异。③耦合协调关系表现出显著的功能分异与空间极化特征。农村山洪韧性与土壤保持的协调性更优;但与水源涵养的协调性呈现剧烈两极分化,北部多处于“优质协调”,而南部凉山腹地长期处于“中度失调”乃至“严重失调”状态。水源涵养功能的提升受到更为严格的自然本底约束,易形成短板效应。[结论]未来的农村山洪韧性提升策略应避免“一刀切”,需对北部协调区侧重提质增效,对南部失调区侧重补短板与适洪恢复,特别是推广耐旱植被与坡改梯相结合的模式,以实现人-水-土系统的协调发展。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] By integrating rural flash flood resilience and ecosystem regulation services into a unified framework, the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of their coupling and coordination relationship were investigated in order to provide support for the sustainable development and decision-making for disaster prevention and mitigation in mountainous rural areas [Methods] Focusing on southwestern Sichuan Province, a region characterized by high flash flood incidence and strategic ecological importance, the pressure-state-response(PSR) model was used to construct a rural flash flood resilience assessment system. The revised universal soil loss equation(RUSLE) and the water balance equation were used to quantify soil conservation and water yield services, respectively. The coupling coordination degree model was utilized to quantitatively evaluate the coordination relationship between the two systems. [Results]① From 2013 to 2023, rural flash flood resilience level rose from 0.343 to 0.471, showing a stable spatial pattern of ‘ high in the north and low in the south '.② Ecosystem regulation services matched the hydrothermal patterns, but were influenced by climate fluctuations, exhibiting non-linear changes with distinct regional differentiation.③ The coupling coordination relationship demonstrated pronounced functional differentiation and spatial polarization. Rural flash flood resilience showed better coordination with soil conservation. However, its coordination with water conservation exhibited sharp polarization, with most northern areas in a state of ‘high-quality coordination', whereas the hinterland of Liangshan in the south remained in a state of ‘moderate dysfunction' or even ‘severe dysfunction' for a long time. The enhancement of water conservation was constrained by more stringent natural background conditions, frequently resulting in a bottleneck effect. [Conclusion] Future strategies for enhancing rural flash flood resilience should avoid a ‘one-size-fits-all' approach. For the northern coordinated areas, efforts should focus on improving efficiency and quality. For the southern dysfunctional areas, emphasis should be placed on addressing weaknesses and promoting flood-adaptive restoration. Specifically, combining drought-tolerant vegetation with slope-to-terrace conversion should be promoted to achieve the coordinated development of the human-water-soil system.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郭旸,徐云.川西南农村山洪韧性与生态调节服务的协调关系[J].水土保持通报,2026,46(3):332-341,368

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-26
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-29
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-24
  • 出版日期: 2026-06-15