河西走廊生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及其影响因素
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X171.1

基金项目:

2025年甘肃省校级研究生科研项目“绿洲城市空间扩张特征及其对水相关生态系统服务的影响:以疏勒河流域为例”(KYZZB2025037)


Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem service value in Hexi Corridor
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的]探究河西走廊生态系统服务价值时空演变规律与驱动机制,为干旱区生态恢复与可持续发展提供科学依据。[方法]基于2000—2023年土地利用数据、地区粮食产量和价格等数据,修正获得河西走廊生态系统服务价值系数表,系统分析该地区生态系统服务价值的时空演变特征,并结合地理探测器和地理加权回归模型进一步分析各因素对地区生态系统服务价值的影响。[结果]①研究期地区土地利用类型以未利用地和草地为主,建设用地与水域的面积增长尤为显著。②研究期地区生态系统服务价值总量呈波动增长。其中,水域生态系统服务价值增幅最为明显,调节服务和支持服务占主导地位;生态系统服务价值呈“南高北低,东高西低”的空间分布格局。③地理探测器结果表明,社会经济因素解释力最强,自然因素次之;地理加权回归模型结果表明,土地利用程度综合指数与生态系统服务价值呈正相关。年降水量与生态系统服务价值以正相关为主,局部呈负相关。人口总数与生态系统服务价值以负相关为主,局部呈正相关。NDVI、高程与生态系统服务价值整体上表现为东南部正相关转变为西北部负相关。[结论]河西走廊“山地-绿洲-荒漠”三大生态功能区生态系统服务价值空间差异显著。未来,为了保障区域生态安全与可持续发展,人们应该在南部祁连山区强化水源涵养与生态屏障功能;在中部绿洲区着力协调人类活动与生态用地的关系;在北部荒漠区则优先推动自然恢复。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The spatiotemporal evolution patterns and driving mechanisms of ecosystem service value in Hexi Corridor were investigated in order to provide a scientific basis for ecological restoration and sustainable development in arid regions. [Methods] Based on land use data, regional grain yield and price data, and other data from 2000 to 2023, the ecosystem service value coefficient table for Hexi Corridor was revised. Subsequently, the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of ecosystem service value in this region were systematically analyzed. The GeoDetector and geographically weighted regression models were employed to further analyze the influence of various factors on regional ecosystem service value. [Results]① During the study period, land use types in the region were predominantly unused land and grassland, with particularly significant increases in the area of construction land and water bodies.② The total ecosystem service value in the region showed an overall increasing trend with fluctuations during the study period. Among ecosystem service types, the value of water body ecosystem services showed the most pronounced increase, with regulating and supporting services dominating. The spatial distribution pattern of ecosystem service value exhibited a ‘high in the south and low in the north, high in the east and low in the west'.③ GeoDetector results indicated that socioeconomic factors provided the strongest explanatory power, followed by natural factors. Geographically weighted regression results revealed a positive correlation between the comprehensive land use degree index and ecosystem service value. Annual precipitation showed a predominantly positive correlation with ecosystem service value, with locally negative correlations. Total population exhibited a predominantly negative correlation with ecosystem service value, with locally positive correlations. NDVI and elevation demonstrated an overall pattern shifting from positive correlations in the southeast to negative correlations in the northwest. [Conclusion] Significant spatial differences in ecosystem service value exist across the three major ecological functional zones of the Hexi Corridor(mountainous, oasis, and desert regions). In the future, to ensure regional ecological security and sustainable development in the northern desert zone, people should enhance water conservation and ecological barrier functions preferably in the southern Qilian Mountains; focus on the coordinating of human activities with ecological land use in the central oasis zone; and give priority to promoting natural restoration.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杜金浩,柴宗刚,兰吉涛.河西走廊生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2026,46(3):424-434

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-20
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-15
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-24
  • 出版日期: 2026-06-15