不同林龄杉木林生态功能评价及障碍因子分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S718.55+

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目“南方低质低效人工林质量改善与生态服务提升技术”(2023YFF1304403)


Evaluation of ecological functions and analysis of obstacle factors in Cunninghamia lanceolata forests of different stand ages
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的] 科学评价福建省长汀县楼子坝国有林场不同林龄杉木林的生态功能综合状况,明确其主要影响因素与提升方向,为该区域杉木林生态经营与功能优化提供数据支撑和科学依据。[方法] 选取该林场5个不同林龄的杉木林设置代表性样地,从水源涵养、保育土壤和林下植被多样性3个维度,选取14个指标构建综合评价体系;采用层次分析法确定指标权重,结合加权综合指数法量化生态功能综合评价值,运用系统障碍度模型识别制约生态功能提升的关键障碍因子。[结果] ①杉木林生态功能综合评价值排序为11 a林分(0.72)>7~8 a林分(0.31)>3~4 a林分(0.28),评价等级分别为Ⅱ级、Ⅳ级、Ⅳ级。生态功能总体随林龄增长呈提升趋势。②随着林龄增加,水源涵养和保育土壤功能呈提升趋势,林下植被多样性功能呈下降趋势。③不同林龄段杉木林的核心障碍因子存在显著阶段性差异。3~4 a林分以枯落物有效拦蓄量、土壤有效蓄水量、土壤侵蚀强度为主,7~8 a林分以枯落物有效拦蓄量、土壤有机质含量为主,11 a林分以土壤有效蓄水量、Shannon-Wiener指数、Simpson指数为主。[结论] 针对该区域杉木林生态经营与功能优化,应实施差异化改善策略,针对3~4 a林分可人工增施混合枯落物,沿等高线设置鱼鳞坑与截水沟;针对7~8 a林分采用沟施方式施用腐熟落叶肥或有机肥,引入乡土阔叶树构建混交林。针对11 a林分采取林下植被调控措施,适度保留乡土灌木和草本植物,并进行混交改造。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The comprehensive ecological functions of Cunninghamia lanceolata forests of different stand ages in Louziba state-owned forest farm, Changting County, Fujian Province, were evaluated in order to identify the main influencing factors and improvement directions, and to provide data support and a scientific basis for ecological management and function optimization of C. lanceolata forests in this region. [Methods] Representative plots were established in five C. lanceolata stands of different stand ages. A comprehensive evaluation system consisting of 14 indicators was constructed from three dimensions, namely water conservation, soil conservation, and understory vegetation diversity. The analytic hierarchy process was used to determine indicator weights, the weighted comprehensive index method was used to quantify the comprehensive ecological function value, and the system obstacle degree model was applied to identify the key obstacle factors restricting ecological function improvement. [Results] ① The comprehensive ecological function values of the C. lanceolata stands were ranked as 11 a(0.72) > 7—8 a(0.31) > 3—4 a(0.28), corresponding to Grade Ⅱ, Grade Ⅳ, and Grade Ⅳ, respectively, indicating that ecological functions generally improved with increasing stand age.② With increasing stand age, water conservation and soil conservation functions showed an increasing trend, whereas understory vegetation diversity showed a decreasing trend.③ The core obstacle factors differed significantly among stand ages. For 3—4 a stands, the main obstacle factors were effective litter interception, effective soil water storage, and soil erosion intensity. For 7—8 a stands, the main factors were effective litter interception and soil organic matter content. For 11 a stands, the main factors were effective soil water storage, the ShannonWiener index, and the Simpson index. [Conclusion] Differentiated improvement strategies should be adopted for ecological management and function optimization of C. lanceolata forests in this region. For 3—4 a stands, mixed litter can be added manually, and fish-scale pits and interception ditches can be arranged along contour lines. For 7—8 a stands, decomposed leaf manure or organic fertilizer can be applied in furrows, and native broad-leaved trees can be introduced to establish mixed forests. For 11 a stands, understory vegetation regulation measures should be adopted, with appropriate retention of native shrubs and herbs, together with mixed-stand transformation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

霍鑫豪,林根根,岳辉,靖艺,杨学安,沈子雅,赵辰辰,程金花.不同林龄杉木林生态功能评价及障碍因子分析[J].水土保持通报,2026,46(4):448-456

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-24
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-03
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-25
  • 出版日期: 2026-08-15