不同水保措施下红壤坡地泥沙及氮磷流失对雨型的响应
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157.1

基金项目:

江西省水利厅科技项目“红壤丘陵区果园多尺度氮磷迁移转化及防控技术研究”(202224ZDKT12),“红壤区小流域水土保持监测技术规范—水文泥沙监测技术规范”(202425BZKT01);江西省技术创新引导类计划项目( 2023KSG01002,20212AEI91011)


Response of sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus loss to rainfall patterns under different soil and water conservation measures on red soil slopes
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的] 探究不同保持措施下地表径流泥沙及氮磷流失对雨型的响应机制,优化南方红壤坡地水土保持措施配置,为该区域水土流失治理提供理论依据。[方法] 以南方红壤区为研究区域,基于2019—2022年自然降雨数据,采用野外径流小区定位观测试验方法,针对果园清耕对照、植物措施(M1)、横坡间作(M2)、顺坡间作(M3)、梯田工程措施(M4)、梯田工程+植物措施(M5)等不同水土保持措施配置,系统分析径流泥沙及氮磷流失对雨型的响应特征。[结果] 研究区雨型构成以短历时、大雨强的前峰型(发生频率41.18%)和中历时、中雨强的中峰型(47.06%)为主,长历时、小雨强的后峰型占比最小。植物措施(M1)与梯田工程+植物措施(M5)均能显著减少径流泥沙及氮磷流失。前峰型下,M1径流深、泥沙流失量分别削减61.2%,91.3%,M5削减58%,94%;中峰型下,二者径流深削减70.6%和54.2%,泥沙量削减80.8%和82.6%;后峰型中,M1仍削减径流深60.5%和泥沙量74.7%。氮磷流失控制方面,M1和M5显著降低了所有雨型下的总磷浓度,其中,前峰型分别削减32.5%和36.1%,M5对总氮削减达16.3%~21.3%。顺坡间作(M3)因垄向与坡向一致,前峰型下泥沙量(0.424 kg)和总磷浓度(0.127 mg/L)较CK增加42.3%和53.0%,加剧了侵蚀风险。[结论] 南方红壤坡地不同水土保持措施中,植物措施和梯田工程+植物措施通过植被截留与工程截蓄作用,可高效阻控多雨型下的水土流失,在南方红壤坡地水土流失治理应予以重视。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The response mechanism of runoff surface sediment and nitrogen and phosphorus loss to rainfall patterns under different holding measure was studied to optimize the scientific configuration of soil and water conservation measures on southern China’s red soil slopes, and provide a theoretical basis for soil and water erosion management in the region. [Methods] Taking the southern red loam area as the study area, based on natural rainfall data from 2019 to 2022, field runoff plot observations were employed to systematically evaluate differently configured soil and water conservation measures, such as orchard clear-tillage control, planting measures (M1), cross-slope intercropping (M2), down-slope intercropping (M3), terracing plus planting (M4), and terracing engineering (M5). Soil and water conservation measures were configured to systematically analyze runoff sediment characteristics and nitrogen and phosphorus loss in response to rainfall patterns. [Results] The composition of rainfall patterns in the study area was dominated by an advanced pattern comprising short-duration, high-intensity rainfall (41.18%) and an intermediate pattern comprising medium-duration, medium-intensity rainfall (47.06%), while the delayed pattern of long-duration, low-intensity rainfall accounted for the smallest proportion. Both plant measures (M1) and terracing plus plant measures (M5) significantly reduced runoff sediment and losses of nitrogen and phosphorus. Under the advanced pattern, runoff depth and sediment loss were reduced by 61.2% and 91.3% for M1, and by 58% and 94% for M5; under the intermediate pattern, runoff depth was reduced by 70.6% and 54.2%, and the amount of sediment was reduced by 80.8% and 82.6%; under the delayed pattern, runoff depth was still reduced by 60.5% and the amount of sediment was reduced by 74.7% for M1. In terms of controlling nitrogen and phosphorus loss, M1 and M5 significantly reduced total phosphorus concentration under all rainfall patterns, with 32.5% and 36.1% reductions in the advanced pattern, and M5 reduced total nitrogen by 16.3%—21.3%. Downslope intercropping (M3) increased the amount of sediment (0.424 kg) and total phosphorus concentration (0.127 mg/L) by 42.3% and 53.0%, respectively, under the advanced pattern when compared to CK, because the erosion risk was exacerbated by the matching ridge and slope orientations. [Conclusion] Among different soil and water conservation measures for southern China’s red soil slopes, plant measures and also terraced field projects combined with plant measures, can effectively prevent and control soil erosion under rainy conditions through engineering and the interception and storage of vegetation. Therefore, these measures should be given due attention in soil erosion control on these slopes.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

梁媛,陈晓安,伍冰晨,奚同行,徐晓晗.不同水保措施下红壤坡地泥沙及氮磷流失对雨型的响应[J].水土保持通报,2025,45(4):10-18

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-17
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-21
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-05
  • 出版日期: 2025-08-15