供需耦合视角下合肥都市圈生态空间冲突诊断与协同策略
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F301.24

基金项目:

安徽省社会科学创新发展研究课题“安徽省际毗邻区空间协同利用的现实困境与靶向治理”(2024CX062);自然资源部江淮耕地资源保护与生态修复重点实验室开放课题(ARPE-2023-KF04);合肥市哲学社会科学规划项目(HFSKQN202523)


Diagnosis and cooperative strategy of ecological spatial conflict in Hefei metropolitan area from a perspective of supply-demand coupling
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的] 诊断合肥都市圈生态空间冲突区域并提出协同策略,为区域生态保护和经济发展提供参考。[方法] 通过形态学空间分析和最小阻力模型提取生态源地、生态廊道,构建生态安全格局;耦合供给适宜性和需求稀缺性,评价城镇空间、农业空间合理范围,识别非生态空间重点区域;采用叠置分析法,测算生态空间冲突指数。[结果] ①合肥都市圈生态景观中部、南部连通性较好,北部细碎化严重,生态源地、廊道呈南多北少特征,核心生态源地集中在南部山地丘陵区。②非生态空间分布呈圈层式分异,中心区开发需求和适宜性高,边缘区较低,郊区表现为过渡性。③生态空间冲突区具有“中心高,边缘低”的异质性,高、较高冲突区(24.21%)集中分布于城郊过渡带,主要为生态敏感性与开发需求性冲突;中低冲突区(75.79%)位于生态本底良好、人类活动强度较低的缓冲区域。④生态空间冲突区宜建立“生态空间底线锁定—非生态空间弹性管控”协同机制,在保障核心生态功能的同时,建立有条件准入与动态适配策略,实现“金山银山”和“绿水青山”的有机衔接。[结论] 都市圈生态空间冲突呈现核心区—边缘的梯度分异特征。生态空间、非生态空间协同配置及差异化治理是实现生态保护与高质量发展的主要路径。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Areas of ecological space conflict in the Hefei metropolitan area were identified, and collaborative strategies were proposed to provide references for regional ecological protection and economic development. [Methods] Ecological source areas and corridors were extracted using morphological spatial analysis and a minimum resistance model to construct an ecological security pattern. Coupling the suitability of supply and the scarcity of demand, the reasonable range of urban and agricultural spaces were evaluated, and key areas of non-ecological space were identified; The superposition analysis method was adopted to calculate the ecological space conflict index. [Results] ① Central and southern regions exhibited superior ecological connectivity, contrasting with severe fragmentation in northern areas. Ecological sources and corridors demonstrated distinct differentiation of more in the south and less in the north, with core sources aggregating in the southern hilly regions. ② Non-ecological spaces displayed concentric zonation: high development suitability and demand in the central zones, transitional characteristics in the suburbs, and lower values in peripheral areas. ③ Spatial conflicts manifested as heterogeneity of higher at the center, and lower alonge the edge with high and higher conflict zones (24.21% of the area) concentrated in urban-rural transition areas, reflecting ecological sensitivity and contradictions in development demand. Medium-low conflict zones (75.79%) occupied buffer regions with favorable ecological conditions and limited human disturbance. ④ In ecological space conflict zones, a dual governance mechanism featuring ‘ecological red lines enforcement’ and ‘adaptive non-ecological space management’ should be established, incorporating conditional access policies and dynamic adaptation strategies to reconcile ecological integrity with development needs. [Conclusion] The ecological space conflicts in metropolitan areas present a gradient differentiation feature of form core area to periphery. The coordinated allocation and differentiated governance of ecological and non-ecological spaces are the main paths for achieving ecological protection and high-quality development.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王秉义,叶琼,闫梦茹,兰春,胡莎莎.供需耦合视角下合肥都市圈生态空间冲突诊断与协同策略[J].水土保持通报,2025,45(4):360-371

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-13
  • 最后修改日期:2025-04-29
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-05
  • 出版日期: 2025-08-15