改良剂对秦巴山区新造耕地土壤质量的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S714.8

基金项目:

安康市科学技术研究发展计划项目“安康市汉滨区高标准农田土壤质量提升技术研究与示范”(AK2023-NY-17);国家重点研发计划项目“典型区域中低产田土壤固碳与产能提升协同技术模式落地机制与示范应用”(2022YFD1901605)


Effects of amendments on soil quality in newly created cultivated land in Qinba Mountain area
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的] 研究不同改良剂对秦巴山区新造耕地土壤质量的提升效果,旨在为新造耕地土壤质量快速提升和恢复生产提供理论依据和技术支持。[方法] 通过2 a田间试验,设置对照(CK)、硫酸亚铁(T1)、生物炭(T2)、微生物菌剂(T3)和复合处理(T4)5个处理,从玉米产量、土壤物理结构、化学性质、土壤酶活性4个方面探究不同改良剂对新造耕地土壤质量和玉米产量提升的效果。[结果] 相比于CK,T2,T3,T4处理的玉米产量分别增加了17.31%,30.57%和25.89%。5个处理的土壤质量指数顺序为:T4>T2>T3>T1>CK。T2和T4处理的土壤pH值、容重、有机质、全氮和碱解氮含量均接近秦巴山区优等耕地水平,同时,T1处理的土壤容重和T3处理的土壤pH值以及容重也接近优等耕地水平。土壤有机质含量是影响土壤物理性质、养分含量和土壤酶活性的关键因素,而土壤微生物活性低可能是限制新造耕地产量提升的主要因素。[结论] 基于新造耕地土壤质量提升角度,生物炭和复合处理可作为该地区新造耕地的重要改良措施;而若考虑成本和产量提升,可选择微生物菌剂作为该地区新造耕地的主要改良措施。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The effects of different soil amendments on improving soil quality in newly cultivated land in Qinba Mountain area were investigated to provide theoretical foundations and technical support for the rapid enhancement of soil quality and restoration of agricultural productivity. [Methods] A two-year field experiment was conducted using five treatments: control (CK), ferrous sulfate (T1), biochar (T2), microbial inoculant (T3) and composite amendment (T4). The effects of these treatments on soil quality and maize yield were evaluated in terms of four dimensions: maize yield, soil physical structure, chemical properties and soil enzyme activity. [Results] Compared with CK, maize yields increased by 17.31%, 30.57% and 25.89% in the T2, T3, and T4 treatments, respectively. The ranking of the soil quality indices for each treatment was as follows: T4 > T2 > T3 > T1 > CK. The soil pH value, bulk density, organic matter, total nitrogen and alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen levels of the T2 and T4 treatments were very close to the corresponding soil indices of high-quality cultivated land in Qinba Mountain area. T1 treatment improved soil bulk density and T3 treatment enhanced soil pH value and bulk density to near-optimal levels. Soil organic matter was the key factor influencing soil physical properties, nutrient content, and enzyme activity, whereas low microbial activity was identified as the primary constraint on yield improvement in the newly created farmland. [Conclusion] For comprehensive enhancement of soil quality, biochar (T2) and composite amendment (T4) are recommended as key technologies for improving newly created farmlands. However, when considering cost-effectiveness and yield improvement, the microbial inoculant (T3) is a practical and efficient measure for newly created farmlands in the region.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

石浩,李洪义,张献华,贺佰成,殷俐娜,王仕稳.改良剂对秦巴山区新造耕地土壤质量的影响[J].水土保持通报,2025,45(4):50-61

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-14
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-19
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-05
  • 出版日期: 2025-08-15