西北地区生态产品价值实现成效评价——基于29个典型案例
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金西部项目“西北地区不同类型生态产品价值核算与实现路径研究”(23XTJ006)


Effectiveness evaluation of ecological product value realization in northwest China——An analysis of 29 typical cases
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的] 全面量化评估西北地区典型案例生态产品价值实现的成效,进一步验证针对典型案例成效评估指标体系的可行性,为其他地区提炼相关典型案例提供参考。[方法] 以西北地区29个典型案例为研究对象,构建“资源-机制-效益”三维评价体系,并基于熵值法和综合指数法,测算生态产品价值实现的总体成效、各阶段成效以及不同模式的成效。[结果] ①生态产品价值实现案例的总体成效呈现显著差异,16个案例未达到36.47的平均水平,价值实现仍有提升空间。多元机制协同是生态产品价值实现过程的核心阶段,综合效益产出受政策时滞等影响,成效显现相对缓慢且得分偏低。②现有的生态产品价值实现模式均包含产业化的价值实现路径。“交易+产业化”“修复+交易+产业化”和“补偿+产业化”的成效得分分别为46.27,41.72,38.62,成效评价结果较好。③“产业化”与“修复+产业化”模式均以多元机制协同为首要成效,“补偿+产业化”模式在综合效益产出方面的成效得分最高,达到48.86。[结论] 西北地区生态产品价值实现已取得阶段性成效,但仍面临综合效益产出较低的问题。在后续推动生态产品价值实现的过程中,需以综合效益最大化为导向,建立健全多元协同机制,持续优化市场交易环境。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] A comprehensive quantitative evaluation of the overall effectiveness and that under different value realization models of typical cases in northwest China was conducted, and the feasibility of the evaluation indicator system for evaluating the effectiveness of typical cases was further verified, in order to provide references for other regions to extract relevant typical cases. [Methods] 29 typical cases in northwest China were selected as the study objects. A three-dimensional evaluation system encompassing ‘resources-mechanismsbenefits' was established. The entropy value method and the comprehensive index method were used to calculate the overall effectiveness, stage-specific effectiveness, and effectiveness of different models in realizing ecological product value. [Results] ① The overall effectiveness of ecological product value realization varied significantly across cases, with 16 cases falling below the average score of 36.47, indicating that there was still room for improvement in value realization. The synergy among multiple mechanisms constituted the core stage in the process of ecological product value realization. The output of comprehensive benefits was influenced by factors such as policy time lags, which resulted in relatively slow performance and lower scores.② All existing ecological product value realization models incorporated industrialization pathways. The effectiveness scores for the ‘transaction+industrialization' ‘restoration+transaction+industrialization' and ‘compensation+industrialization' models were 46.27, 41.72, and 38.62, respectively, indicating relatively good performance.③ Both the ‘industrialization' and ‘restoration+industrialization' models prioritized multi-mechanism synergy as their primary achievement, while the ‘compensation+industrialization' model achieved the highest score(48.86) in comprehensive benefit output. [Conclusion] The realization of ecological product value in northwest China has achieved phased results, yet it still faces the challenge of relatively low comprehensive benefit output. In the subsequent efforts to promote ecological product value realization, it is essential to be guided by the goal of maximizing comprehensive benefits, establish and improve multi-mechanism synergy, and continuously optimize the market transaction environment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨朔,杨嘉汶,赵国平.西北地区生态产品价值实现成效评价——基于29个典型案例[J].水土保持通报,2026,46(2):248-259

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-08
  • 最后修改日期:2026-01-06
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-05-13
  • 出版日期: