Assessment of WEPP Model Applicability in Black Soil Zone of Northeast China-A Case Study of Slope Gradient and Soil and Water Conservation Measures
DOI:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Based on data observed from the automatic meteorological station near runoff plots and measured soil loss data from field runoff plots at Binxian Experimental Station in 2008,runoff and soil loss from the plots in black soil zone,Northeast of China were simulated.The simulation results were compared with measured values and the applicability of WEPP model was assessed.Results showed that Nash -Sutcliffe model efficiencies of event runoff simulation on different slopes by WEPP were 0.47,0.03,and-5.9,respectively.Nash - Sutcliffe model efficiencies of event soil loss simulation were 0.58,0.72,and 0.60,respectively.It indicated that event simulation result of soil loss was better than event simulation result of run-off.WEPP model was sensitive to the change of slope.Nash - Sutcliffe model efficiencies of event runoff simulation to soybean,Dallis grass,alfalfa,and elm were 0.81,0.71,0.83,and 0.94,whereas Nash-Sut-cliffe model efficiencies of event soil loss simulation were 0.81,0.71,0.83 and 0.94,respectively.This show that simulation results of alfalfa and soybean were better,compared with simulation results of grass and elm and simulation results of bare land on different slopes.From the above results,WEPP can be used to simulate event runoff and soil loss under different soil and water conservation measures and event soil loss at different slope gradients on bare land,but it is not suitable to simulate event runoff at different slope gradients on bare land.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

刘远利,郑粉莉,王彬,王玉玺,解运杰,樊华. WEPP模型在东北黑土区的适用性评价--以坡度和水保措施为例[J].水土保持通报英文版,2010,(1):139-145

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:July 09,2009
  • Revised:November 08,2009
  • Adopted:
  • Online: November 26,2014
  • Published: