Comparative Analysis of Ecological Value Loss and Gain from Hydropower Cascade Development in Naqu River
DOI:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Hydropower development has an inevitable impact on local environment, while promoting socio-economic development and improving the quality of people′s lives. The loss and gain analysis of ecological en-vironment, expressed by currency in a unified dimension, may provide a basis for engineering decision be-cause of its general evaluation on environment. An evaluation index system is established and the benefits and costs from hydropower development are analyzed by taking the environment affected by two scenarios of cascade hydropower development in the Naqu River for an example. Results show that the direct ecological values from two scenarios of cascade hydropower in the Naqu River are 1.05×108 and 1.46×108 yuan per year and the indirect values, 5.13×107 and 5.04×107 yuan per year, while the ecological environment costs are 9. 40×107 and 9.73×107 yuan per year, respectively. The ratio of the direct environmental benefit to the environmental cost from the two scenarios is 1.1∶1 and 1.5∶1, respectively, which illustrates that the benefits exceed the costs and the scenario two is superior to the scenario one. The valuation methodology of ecoenvironmental value in the hydropower development is not yet mature and currently, there is no unified evaluation standard. So there are some differences in the completeness and accuracy of the evaluation contents, as compared with the practice. The evaluation system can only provide a reference basis for the construction of hydropower development and environmental protection.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

马鹏刚,刘康,郭艺歌.那曲河水电梯级开发的生态价值损益比较分析[J].水土保持通报英文版,2012,(5):265-269,285

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:April 09,2012
  • Revised:June 13,2012
  • Adopted:
  • Online: November 25,2014
  • Published: